hany areta - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by hany areta
Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2021
This legal research aims to optimize the handling of Non-Consensual Dissemination Of Intimate Ima... more This legal research aims to optimize the handling of Non-Consensual Dissemination Of Intimate Images in the context of realizing a just law by revising the explanations of Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 6 of the Pornography Law ("Pornography Law"), as well as Article 27 paragraph (1) Law on Information and Electronic Transactions ("UU ITE"). This study uses a normative approach to the literature study method. This research is a reaction to the wrong interpretation of the regulation because it often leads to multiple interpretations. This is reflected in the nomenclature of "personal interest" in the Elucidation of Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 6 of the Pornography Law which does not have any concrete limitations regarding the rights possessed. In line with this, the formulation of "violating decency" in Article 27 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law also leads to inconsistencies in the handling of various NCII cases. The author concludes that the definition of the two formulations, as well as the types of video storage that fall into the category of personal interest must be elaborated. Indonesia can also look in the mirror with other countries that are able to handle NCII cases, namely Australia.
Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 2021
This legal research aims to optimize the handling of Non-Consensual Dissemination Of Intimate Ima... more This legal research aims to optimize the handling of Non-Consensual Dissemination Of Intimate Images in the context of realizing a just law by revising the explanations of Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 6 of the Pornography Law ("Pornography Law"), as well as Article 27 paragraph (1) Law on Information and Electronic Transactions ("UU ITE"). This study uses a normative approach to the literature study method. This research is a reaction to the wrong interpretation of the regulation because it often leads to multiple interpretations. This is reflected in the nomenclature of "personal interest" in the Elucidation of Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 6 of the Pornography Law which does not have any concrete limitations regarding the rights possessed. In line with this, the formulation of "violating decency" in Article 27 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law also leads to inconsistencies in the handling of various NCII cases. The author concludes that the definition of the two formulations, as well as the types of video storage that fall into the category of personal interest must be elaborated. Indonesia can also look in the mirror with other countries that are able to handle NCII cases, namely Australia.