manas kumar sahu - Academia.edu (original) (raw)

Uploads

Papers by manas kumar sahu

Research paper thumbnail of Phenomenal Consciousness: A Critical Analysis of Knowledge Argument, Inverted Spectrum Argument and Conceivability Argument

Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 2020

The objective of this paper is to defend the non-reductive thesis of phenomenal consciousness. Th... more The objective of this paper is to defend the non-reductive thesis of phenomenal consciousness. This paper will give an overview of the arguments for the non-reductive explanation of phenomenal consciousness and justify why the reductionist approach is implausible in the context of explaining phenomenal subjective experience. The debate between reductionist and non-reductionist on the project of Demystifying and Mystifying phenomenal consciousness is driven by two fundamental assumptions-1) Reductive-Naturalistic Objectivism, 2) Phenomenal Realism. There are several arguments for the irreducibility of phenomenal consciousness; this paper will focus on the inverted spectrum argument, knowledge argument, and the conceivability argument.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of The Kantian Notion of Freedom and Autonomy of Artificial Agency

Prometeica: Journal of Philosophy of Science, 2021

The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (e... more The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (especially the problem of the third antinomy and its resolution in the critique of pure reason); its significance in the contemporary debate on free-will and determinism, and the possibility of autonomy of artificial agency in the Kantian paradigm of autonomy. Kant's resolution of the third antinomy by positing the ground in the noumenal self resolves the problem of antinomies; however, invites an explanatory gapbetween phenomenality and the noumenal self; even if he has successfully established the compatibility of natural causality and non-natural causality through his transcendental argument. This paper is also devoted to establishing the plausibility of the knowledge claim that Kantian reduction of phenomenality has served half of the purpose of the AI scientists on the possibility of Artificial Autonomous Agency.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Sankarāchārya and Kantian Notion of Consciousness

Advatya Utsav international Conference, 2019

In this paper, my objective is to show how the Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent... more In this paper, my objective is to show how the Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent from the Kantian notion of reality, despite many similarities between them. Cartesian skepticism of universal doubt is a challenged for the Kantian notion of reality; however, it can't be applied to Sankarāchārya's concept of reality because of the acceptance of different paradigm to explain the reality and his non-representationalistic approach towards the reality. The attack on representationalism can't be applicable to Sankarāchārya's philosophy.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Qualia and intentionality

journal of all odisha philosophy association, 2019

The problem of consciousness has become a significant problem in philosophy from the last few dec... more The problem of consciousness has become a significant problem in philosophy from the last few decades. Qualia and intentionality are the two feature of consciousness. Qualia represents conscious awareness, subjectivity, or phenomenality, whereas intentionality represents understanding or object-directedness. These are the two major issues in the philosophy of mind while we address the problem of consciousness. The objective of this paper is to give an overview of these two features of consciousness, namely intentionality, and qualia. Qualia is subjective, whereas intentionality or object-directedness is objective. This paper will focus on some major question regarding qualia and intentionality like, do qualia exist? What is the relationship between qualia and intentionality? Can qualia be reduced or to identify with intentionality or intentionality represent the qualia? Science by its nature objective whereas consciousness by its nature subjective, so how can there be a science of c...

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Kantian Notion of freedom and Autonomy of Artificial Agency

Prometeica Journal of Philosophy and Science , 2021

The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (e... more The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (especially the problem of the third antinomy and its resolution in the critique of pure reason); its significance in the contemporary debate on free-will and determinism, and the possibility of autonomy of artificial agency in the Kantian paradigm of autonomy. Kant's resolution of the third antinomy by positing the ground in the noumenal self resolves the problem of antinomies; however, invites an explanatory gap between phenomenality and the noumenal self; even if he has successfully established the compatibility of natural causality and non-natural causality through his transcendental argument. This paper is also devoted to establish the plausibility of the knowledge claim that Kantian reduction of phenomenality has served half of the purpose of the AI scientists on the possibility of Artificial Autonomous Agency

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Phenomenal Consciousness: A Critical Analysis of Knowledge Argument, Inverted Spectrum Argument and Conceivability Argument

Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 2020

The objective of this paper is to defend the non-reductive thesis of phenomenal consciousness. Th... more The objective of this paper is to defend the non-reductive thesis of phenomenal consciousness. This paper will give an overview of the arguments for the non-reductive explanation of phenomenal consciousness and justify why the reductionist approach is implausible in the context of explaining phenomenal subjective experience. The debate between reductionist and non-reductionist on the project of Demystifying and Mystifying phenomenal consciousness is driven by two fundamental assumptions-1) Reductive-Naturalistic Objectivism, 2) Phenomenal Realism. There are several arguments for the irreducibility of phenomenal consciousness; this paper will focus on the inverted spectrum argument, knowledge argument, and the conceivability argument.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of The Kantian Notion of Freedom and Autonomy of Artificial Agency

Prometeica: Journal of Philosophy of Science, 2021

The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (e... more The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (especially the problem of the third antinomy and its resolution in the critique of pure reason); its significance in the contemporary debate on free-will and determinism, and the possibility of autonomy of artificial agency in the Kantian paradigm of autonomy. Kant's resolution of the third antinomy by positing the ground in the noumenal self resolves the problem of antinomies; however, invites an explanatory gapbetween phenomenality and the noumenal self; even if he has successfully established the compatibility of natural causality and non-natural causality through his transcendental argument. This paper is also devoted to establishing the plausibility of the knowledge claim that Kantian reduction of phenomenality has served half of the purpose of the AI scientists on the possibility of Artificial Autonomous Agency.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Sankarāchārya and Kantian Notion of Consciousness

Advatya Utsav international Conference, 2019

In this paper, my objective is to show how the Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent... more In this paper, my objective is to show how the Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent from the Kantian notion of reality, despite many similarities between them. Cartesian skepticism of universal doubt is a challenged for the Kantian notion of reality; however, it can't be applied to Sankarāchārya's concept of reality because of the acceptance of different paradigm to explain the reality and his non-representationalistic approach towards the reality. The attack on representationalism can't be applicable to Sankarāchārya's philosophy.

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Qualia and intentionality

journal of all odisha philosophy association, 2019

The problem of consciousness has become a significant problem in philosophy from the last few dec... more The problem of consciousness has become a significant problem in philosophy from the last few decades. Qualia and intentionality are the two feature of consciousness. Qualia represents conscious awareness, subjectivity, or phenomenality, whereas intentionality represents understanding or object-directedness. These are the two major issues in the philosophy of mind while we address the problem of consciousness. The objective of this paper is to give an overview of these two features of consciousness, namely intentionality, and qualia. Qualia is subjective, whereas intentionality or object-directedness is objective. This paper will focus on some major question regarding qualia and intentionality like, do qualia exist? What is the relationship between qualia and intentionality? Can qualia be reduced or to identify with intentionality or intentionality represent the qualia? Science by its nature objective whereas consciousness by its nature subjective, so how can there be a science of c...

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact

Research paper thumbnail of Kantian Notion of freedom and Autonomy of Artificial Agency

Prometeica Journal of Philosophy and Science , 2021

The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (e... more The objective of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of the Kantian notion of freedom (especially the problem of the third antinomy and its resolution in the critique of pure reason); its significance in the contemporary debate on free-will and determinism, and the possibility of autonomy of artificial agency in the Kantian paradigm of autonomy. Kant's resolution of the third antinomy by positing the ground in the noumenal self resolves the problem of antinomies; however, invites an explanatory gap between phenomenality and the noumenal self; even if he has successfully established the compatibility of natural causality and non-natural causality through his transcendental argument. This paper is also devoted to establish the plausibility of the knowledge claim that Kantian reduction of phenomenality has served half of the purpose of the AI scientists on the possibility of Artificial Autonomous Agency

Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact