roman kolodkin - Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Papers by roman kolodkin
Collaborators David VanderZwaag (Dalhousie University); Martin Pratt (Durham University); Roman K... more Collaborators David VanderZwaag (Dalhousie University); Martin Pratt (Durham University); Roman Kolodkin (Embassy of The Russian Federation in The Netherlands); Jorgen Lilje-Jensen (Foreign Ministry of Denmark); Christian Marcussen (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland); Bjorn Kunoy (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Faroe Islands); Sergey Rogov, Alexander Vylegzhanin (Russian Academy of Sciences); Coalter Lathrop (Sovereign Geographic Inc.); Betsy Baker (University of Alaska Fairbanks); Ian TownsendGault (University of British Columbia); James Crawford (University of Cambridge); Larry Mayer (University of New Hampshire); Geir Ulfstein (University of Oslo); Andrew Serdy (University of Southampton); Stuart Elden (University of Warwick); Elizabeth Riddell-Dixon (University of Western Ontario)
forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within t... more forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within two weeks of the date of the present document to the English Translation Section, room E.6040, Palais des Nations, Geneva (trad_sec_eng@unog.ch). GE.17-11450 (E) 170717 090817 International Law Commission Sixty-ninth session (second part) Provisional summary record of the 3372nd meeting Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Tuesday, 11 July 2017, at 10 a.m.
Meždunarodnoe pravosudie, 2021
Normative propositions of the international courts, including these of the International Tribunal... more Normative propositions of the international courts, including these of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, are considered in the paper as provisions in the judicial decisions and advisory opinions, spelling out, formulating or describing international law norms, prescriptions, prohibitions or authorizations, which are applicable, in the court’s view, in the case at hand and the similar cases. Such a proposition is considered to be a description of a legal norm, its spelling out by a court, but not a norm or its source. In contrast with legal norms, judicial normative propositions are descriptive, not prescriptive; they may be true or wrong. Normative propositions are not transformed into norms solely by their repetition in judicial decisions. The author considers not only ITLOS decisions but also the Tribunal’s and its Seabed disputes chamber advisory opinions containing normative propositions to be subsidiary means for the determination of the rules of law under arti...
Towards World Constitutionalism, 2005
Criminal Law Forum, 1994
An Ad Hoc International Tribunal 383 statutes of both tribunals, the first crime over which they ... more An Ad Hoc International Tribunal 383 statutes of both tribunals, the first crime over which they were given jurisdiction was labeled "[c]rimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the 9 ,,4 foregoing. Although the possibility of an international criminal jurisdiction is contemplated by two universal international treaties in force, 5 attempts to adopt a statute for, let alone set up, an international criminal court, within the UN framework, 6 have been uniformly unsuccessful. Until the 4
Collaborators David VanderZwaag (Dalhousie University); Martin Pratt (Durham University); Roman K... more Collaborators David VanderZwaag (Dalhousie University); Martin Pratt (Durham University); Roman Kolodkin (Embassy of The Russian Federation in The Netherlands); Jorgen Lilje-Jensen (Foreign Ministry of Denmark); Christian Marcussen (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland); Bjorn Kunoy (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Faroe Islands); Sergey Rogov, Alexander Vylegzhanin (Russian Academy of Sciences); Coalter Lathrop (Sovereign Geographic Inc.); Betsy Baker (University of Alaska Fairbanks); Ian TownsendGault (University of British Columbia); James Crawford (University of Cambridge); Larry Mayer (University of New Hampshire); Geir Ulfstein (University of Oslo); Andrew Serdy (University of Southampton); Stuart Elden (University of Warwick); Elizabeth Riddell-Dixon (University of Western Ontario)
forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within t... more forth in a memorandum and also incorporated in a copy of the record. They should be sent within two weeks of the date of the present document to the English Translation Section, room E.6040, Palais des Nations, Geneva (trad_sec_eng@unog.ch). GE.17-11450 (E) 170717 090817 International Law Commission Sixty-ninth session (second part) Provisional summary record of the 3372nd meeting Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Tuesday, 11 July 2017, at 10 a.m.
Meždunarodnoe pravosudie, 2021
Normative propositions of the international courts, including these of the International Tribunal... more Normative propositions of the international courts, including these of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, are considered in the paper as provisions in the judicial decisions and advisory opinions, spelling out, formulating or describing international law norms, prescriptions, prohibitions or authorizations, which are applicable, in the court’s view, in the case at hand and the similar cases. Such a proposition is considered to be a description of a legal norm, its spelling out by a court, but not a norm or its source. In contrast with legal norms, judicial normative propositions are descriptive, not prescriptive; they may be true or wrong. Normative propositions are not transformed into norms solely by their repetition in judicial decisions. The author considers not only ITLOS decisions but also the Tribunal’s and its Seabed disputes chamber advisory opinions containing normative propositions to be subsidiary means for the determination of the rules of law under arti...
Towards World Constitutionalism, 2005
Criminal Law Forum, 1994
An Ad Hoc International Tribunal 383 statutes of both tribunals, the first crime over which they ... more An Ad Hoc International Tribunal 383 statutes of both tribunals, the first crime over which they were given jurisdiction was labeled "[c]rimes against peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the 9 ,,4 foregoing. Although the possibility of an international criminal jurisdiction is contemplated by two universal international treaties in force, 5 attempts to adopt a statute for, let alone set up, an international criminal court, within the UN framework, 6 have been uniformly unsuccessful. Until the 4