Miklós Kerekes | Istanbul University (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Miklós Kerekes
Archivum Anatolicum, 2024
Kültepe tabletlerinden bilinen Ticaret Koloni Çağı, diğer adıyla Eski Assur Dönemi ve çok iyi bel... more Kültepe tabletlerinden bilinen Ticaret Koloni Çağı, diğer adıyla Eski Assur Dönemi ve çok iyi belgelenmiş Yeni Assur dönemi arasında Assurlular Anadolu'da Orta Assur döneminde de varlıklarını sürdürmekteydi. Bu dönem şu ana kadar en çok kral yazıtlarına göre anlatılmış olsa da bunların dışında yüzey araştırmaları, kazılar, mektuplaşmalar ve paleoekolojik verilere dayanarak çok daha kapsayıcı bir resim ortaya çıkarılabilir. Makalede başka sorunlar yanı sıra Assurluların Orta Assur döneminde nerede, nasıl ve niçin yerleştikleri incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda fethettikleri topraklardaki izlere dayanarak bu yayılmanın ekonomik arka planı da araştırılmaktadır.
The Intellectual Heritage of the Ancient Near East. Proceedings of the 64th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale and the 12th Melammu Symposium, University of Innsbruck, July 16–20, 2018, 2023
At first sight, the Neo-Assyrian provincial system can be seen as a highly uniform, standardized ... more At first sight, the Neo-Assyrian provincial system can be seen as a highly
uniform, standardized structure. But the system was not as stable as it seems; it was constantly changing. Anatolia was always a kind of borderland and a changing and expanding scene for the Assyrians. So this region (specifically for the research, present-day Turkey) provides a perfect opportunity to investigate the expansion of the provincial system. This expansion of the system, accompanied by constant change was always influenced by several factors. Time is one of the most evident ones: as the frontier of the empire expanded, the same province will have shifted from the role of borderland to that of core province. Also, Assyrian rule must have had a different degree and type of influence in a province after a few decades as opposed to hundreds of years. The ethnic background of a region may constitute another factor. For example, if a region had belonged to the empire during the Middle Assyrian period and had an established Assyrian population, it will have served as a more solid base for a newly formed state. Also, non-Assyrian local populations (Aramean, Luwian, Hurrian, or others), and their cultures (Aramean, Syrio-Hittite, Hurrian, etc.) might have had different effects. To incorporate a city-state or a region ruled by a semi-nomadic tribe respectively required different approaches. Finally, geography is also an inevitable factor: mountainous terrain and lowlands require different approaches from the centre to form a functioning province.
(Anadolu Araştırmaları 20) The Neo-Assyrian army is generally known from sources discovered in t... more (Anadolu Araştırmaları 20)
The Neo-Assyrian army is generally known from sources discovered in the core of the empire, i.e., palace reliefs, correspondence from the royal archives and royal inscriptions. Most of these sources date back to the Sargonid period. The archaeological and textual records from the ancient city of Gūzāna provide an opportunity to balance the picture drawn from these sources. Based on its relatively peaceful transition from an independent Aramean kingdom to an Assyrian province at the turn of the 9th–8th century BC, it can be supposed that the Aramean-type army had a significant influence on the troops stationed in the province during the early Neo-Assyrian period. The subjects of the present reconstruction are, on one hand, the bas-reliefs from the Temple Palace of Kapara, that serve as the main source of our knowledge on the Aramean armies. On the other hand, the archive of Mannu-kī-Aššūr from the early 8th century BC provides information about the Assyrian provincial army of the same period. By means of a detailed analysis, the texts from this archive give a more detailed and complex insight to the less-known provincial army in the early Neo-Assyrian period. This paper also provides arguments for the existence of a workshop manufacturing composite bows.
"With the new CDLI photo of YOS 15 168 it was possible to add valuable details to the previously ... more "With the new CDLI photo of YOS 15 168 it was possible to add valuable details to the previously published seal legend. After analysing and comparing the text and the seal inscription there is
a high chance that the owner of the seal, Tūram-Dagan is identical with the important official of the Puzriš-Dagan administration. If we accept his reconstructed šu’i title a new stage can be added to his career."
Book Reviews by Miklós Kerekes
Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Haberler, 46 (2021)
Archivum Anatolicum, 2024
Kültepe tabletlerinden bilinen Ticaret Koloni Çağı, diğer adıyla Eski Assur Dönemi ve çok iyi bel... more Kültepe tabletlerinden bilinen Ticaret Koloni Çağı, diğer adıyla Eski Assur Dönemi ve çok iyi belgelenmiş Yeni Assur dönemi arasında Assurlular Anadolu'da Orta Assur döneminde de varlıklarını sürdürmekteydi. Bu dönem şu ana kadar en çok kral yazıtlarına göre anlatılmış olsa da bunların dışında yüzey araştırmaları, kazılar, mektuplaşmalar ve paleoekolojik verilere dayanarak çok daha kapsayıcı bir resim ortaya çıkarılabilir. Makalede başka sorunlar yanı sıra Assurluların Orta Assur döneminde nerede, nasıl ve niçin yerleştikleri incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda fethettikleri topraklardaki izlere dayanarak bu yayılmanın ekonomik arka planı da araştırılmaktadır.
The Intellectual Heritage of the Ancient Near East. Proceedings of the 64th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale and the 12th Melammu Symposium, University of Innsbruck, July 16–20, 2018, 2023
At first sight, the Neo-Assyrian provincial system can be seen as a highly uniform, standardized ... more At first sight, the Neo-Assyrian provincial system can be seen as a highly
uniform, standardized structure. But the system was not as stable as it seems; it was constantly changing. Anatolia was always a kind of borderland and a changing and expanding scene for the Assyrians. So this region (specifically for the research, present-day Turkey) provides a perfect opportunity to investigate the expansion of the provincial system. This expansion of the system, accompanied by constant change was always influenced by several factors. Time is one of the most evident ones: as the frontier of the empire expanded, the same province will have shifted from the role of borderland to that of core province. Also, Assyrian rule must have had a different degree and type of influence in a province after a few decades as opposed to hundreds of years. The ethnic background of a region may constitute another factor. For example, if a region had belonged to the empire during the Middle Assyrian period and had an established Assyrian population, it will have served as a more solid base for a newly formed state. Also, non-Assyrian local populations (Aramean, Luwian, Hurrian, or others), and their cultures (Aramean, Syrio-Hittite, Hurrian, etc.) might have had different effects. To incorporate a city-state or a region ruled by a semi-nomadic tribe respectively required different approaches. Finally, geography is also an inevitable factor: mountainous terrain and lowlands require different approaches from the centre to form a functioning province.
(Anadolu Araştırmaları 20) The Neo-Assyrian army is generally known from sources discovered in t... more (Anadolu Araştırmaları 20)
The Neo-Assyrian army is generally known from sources discovered in the core of the empire, i.e., palace reliefs, correspondence from the royal archives and royal inscriptions. Most of these sources date back to the Sargonid period. The archaeological and textual records from the ancient city of Gūzāna provide an opportunity to balance the picture drawn from these sources. Based on its relatively peaceful transition from an independent Aramean kingdom to an Assyrian province at the turn of the 9th–8th century BC, it can be supposed that the Aramean-type army had a significant influence on the troops stationed in the province during the early Neo-Assyrian period. The subjects of the present reconstruction are, on one hand, the bas-reliefs from the Temple Palace of Kapara, that serve as the main source of our knowledge on the Aramean armies. On the other hand, the archive of Mannu-kī-Aššūr from the early 8th century BC provides information about the Assyrian provincial army of the same period. By means of a detailed analysis, the texts from this archive give a more detailed and complex insight to the less-known provincial army in the early Neo-Assyrian period. This paper also provides arguments for the existence of a workshop manufacturing composite bows.
"With the new CDLI photo of YOS 15 168 it was possible to add valuable details to the previously ... more "With the new CDLI photo of YOS 15 168 it was possible to add valuable details to the previously published seal legend. After analysing and comparing the text and the seal inscription there is
a high chance that the owner of the seal, Tūram-Dagan is identical with the important official of the Puzriš-Dagan administration. If we accept his reconstructed šu’i title a new stage can be added to his career."
Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Haberler, 46 (2021)