SQUIRE Reporting Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies (original) (raw)
Guide to Statistics and Methods
Reporting Guidelines
April 7, 2021
JAMA Surg. 2021;156(6):579-581. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0531
visual abstract icon editorial comment icon author interview icon Interviews multimedia icon Multimedia audio icon
- Guide to Statistics and Methods STROBE Reporting Guidelines for Observational Studies
Amir A. Ghaferi, MD, MS; Todd A. Schwartz, DrPH; Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods CHEERS Reporting Guidelines for Economic Evaluations
Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju, MD, MA, MPHS; Jason S. Haukoos, MD, MSc; Jennifer F. Tseng, MD, MPH
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods TRIPOD Reporting Guidelines for Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies
Rachel E. Patzer, PhD, MPH; Amy H. Kaji, MD, PhD; Yuman Fong, MD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods ISPOR Reporting Guidelines for Comparative Effectiveness Research
Nader N. Massarweh, MD, MPH; Jason S. Haukoos, MD, MSc; Amir A. Ghaferi, MD, MS
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews
Shipra Arya, MD, SM; Amy H. Kaji, MD, PhD; Marja A. Boermeester, MD, PhD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods AAPOR Reporting Guidelines for Survey Studies
Susan C. Pitt, MD, MPHS; Todd A. Schwartz, DrPH; Danny Chu, MD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies
Benjamin S. Brooke, MD, PhD; Todd A. Schwartz, DrPH, MS; Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods TREND Reporting Guidelines for Nonrandomized/Quasi-Experimental Study Designs
Alex B. Haynes, MD, MPH; Jason S. Haukoos, MD, MSc; Justin B. Dimick, MD, MPH
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods The CONSORT Framework
Ryan P. Merkow, MD, MS; Amy H. Kaji, MD, PhD; Kamal M. F. Itani, MD
JAMA Surgery - Guide to Statistics and Methods SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies
Lesly A. Dossett, MD, MPH; Amy H. Kaji, MD, PhD; Amalia Cochran, MD
JAMA Surgery
Full Text
The science of quality and safety is different from traditional science in so many ways that early attempts to define improvement work as science often generated tremendous debate and even contempt in the scientific community. Further, initial efforts to share findings and disseminate knowledge in the field by way of scholarly publication were limited by an inability to conform to traditional templates used when publishing scientific findings based on hypothesis testing. In 1999, the Quality Improvement Report Guidelines1 were published to guide manuscript preparation for studies on local quality improvement. In response to continued confusion on how to format these manuscripts in a structured, meaningful fashion, the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) reporting guideline was released in 2008 and revised in 2015 (SQUIRE 2.0).2 SQUIRE 2.0 was developed using a combination of semistructured interviews and focus groups with end users, expert engagement in the interpretation of the interviews, and pilot testing. The guideline provides direction on how to report systematic efforts in health care improvement regardless of the specific approach used. A summary of the guideline is presented in the Box. While SQUIRE is less frequently used than other frameworks (eg, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials [CONSORT]), we hope this article helps elevate its use in the field of surgery. One reason for its limited use may be the lack of requirement for its use by many journals.
- Editorial Effective Use of Reporting Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Surgical Research
JAMA Surgery
Full Text