Daniel Kilbride | John Carroll University (original) (raw)
Uploads
Essays & Reviews by Daniel Kilbride
Civil War History, 2021
Antebellum racism did not doom the Reconstruction project of black citizenship to failure. In the... more Antebellum racism did not doom the Reconstruction project of black citizenship to failure. In the 1850s, a flood of African travel accounts captivated Anglo-American readers. These appeared at an opportune time for Northerners committed to granting citizenship to 4 million newly emancipated slaves. Together with the glorious record of black military service, these books proved that people of African descent possessed the moral and intellectual qualities to participate in civic life. In the 1860s, however, a new rash of African travel accounts appeared that gave free rein to the most lurid images of African peoples. White Southerners and their Northern allies realized the potential of these accounts and weaponized them. They seized control of the terms of the debate over black citizenship. Instead of demanding that the defeated South obey the Union’s basic demands for just treatment of the freedpeople, Republicans allowed themselves to be diverted into a contest over the innate barbarity of African people. It was a wholly unnecessary debate and one that, given the ruthlessness of their opponents, Republicans were poorly positioned to win.
Journal of Southern History 82:4 (November 2016), 789-822. David Livingstone posed a real proble... more Journal of Southern History 82:4 (November 2016), 789-822.
David Livingstone posed a real problem for white southerners before the Civil War: he was an international hero, but also an abolitionist. Like other antislavery celebrities, such as Charles Dickens, the South could not simply pretend he did not exist. So they took up a number of strategies to recognize him without acknowledging his hostility to slavery, including shameless appropriation (claiming he vindicated reopening the slave trade), and, chiefly, selective accommodation. Southerners simply ignored, worked around, or winked at Livingstone's antislavery message. They were forced into these often shameless intellectual acrobatics because rejecting Livingstone was tantamount to rejecting western civilization, which white southerners were unwilling to do. The lesson here is that the white South did not reject modernity -- modernity was rejecting it. And white southerners blinked first.
This review appeared in the Georgia Historical Quarterly, Vol. 99 no. 2, pp. 246-48.
Slavery & Abolition: A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies
Journal of Southern History
Journal of the Early Republic
Journal of Southern History
Journal of Southern History
American Historical Review, 2009
Journal of The Early Republic, 2005
American Historical Review, 2008
Journal of Family History, 2003
Civil War History, 2021
Antebellum racism did not doom the Reconstruction project of black citizenship to failure. In the... more Antebellum racism did not doom the Reconstruction project of black citizenship to failure. In the 1850s, a flood of African travel accounts captivated Anglo-American readers. These appeared at an opportune time for Northerners committed to granting citizenship to 4 million newly emancipated slaves. Together with the glorious record of black military service, these books proved that people of African descent possessed the moral and intellectual qualities to participate in civic life. In the 1860s, however, a new rash of African travel accounts appeared that gave free rein to the most lurid images of African peoples. White Southerners and their Northern allies realized the potential of these accounts and weaponized them. They seized control of the terms of the debate over black citizenship. Instead of demanding that the defeated South obey the Union’s basic demands for just treatment of the freedpeople, Republicans allowed themselves to be diverted into a contest over the innate barbarity of African people. It was a wholly unnecessary debate and one that, given the ruthlessness of their opponents, Republicans were poorly positioned to win.
Journal of Southern History 82:4 (November 2016), 789-822. David Livingstone posed a real proble... more Journal of Southern History 82:4 (November 2016), 789-822.
David Livingstone posed a real problem for white southerners before the Civil War: he was an international hero, but also an abolitionist. Like other antislavery celebrities, such as Charles Dickens, the South could not simply pretend he did not exist. So they took up a number of strategies to recognize him without acknowledging his hostility to slavery, including shameless appropriation (claiming he vindicated reopening the slave trade), and, chiefly, selective accommodation. Southerners simply ignored, worked around, or winked at Livingstone's antislavery message. They were forced into these often shameless intellectual acrobatics because rejecting Livingstone was tantamount to rejecting western civilization, which white southerners were unwilling to do. The lesson here is that the white South did not reject modernity -- modernity was rejecting it. And white southerners blinked first.
This review appeared in the Georgia Historical Quarterly, Vol. 99 no. 2, pp. 246-48.
Slavery & Abolition: A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies
Journal of Southern History
Journal of the Early Republic
Journal of Southern History
Journal of Southern History
American Historical Review, 2009
Journal of The Early Republic, 2005
American Historical Review, 2008
Journal of Family History, 2003
Register of the Kentucky Historical Society
Journal of Southern History
Journal of American Studies
Rocky Mountain Review, Jun 21, 2014
African exploration accounts of the 1850s had the potential to soften racial attitudes in the Nor... more African exploration accounts of the 1850s had the potential to soften racial attitudes in the North. During Reconstruction, Republicans used them -- along with the record of black military service -- to argue that African Americans possessed the capacity for civic equality. But a new raft of race-obsessed exploration accounts in the 1860s repudiated that message, allowing conservatives to weaponize African travel to defeat Racial policies. They set the terms of the debate, forcing Republicans to argue for black capacity on increasingly unfavorable ground. The debate reveals that racial attitudes did not doom Reconstruction to failure. The evidence shows that northern attitudes were open to challenge.
My essay for the St. George Tucker Society meeting, July 2016
Society for Historians of the Early American Republic, July 2016
Note: this is a shortened version of a much longer piece, and I haven't straightened out the note... more Note: this is a shortened version of a much longer piece, and I haven't straightened out the notes from the long essay to the conference paper. Chill out, in other words.
David Livingstone was the greatest African explorer of the middle-nineteenth century -- a missionary, a humanitarian, a visionary for the integration of Africa into western civilization. He was an international hero. He was also an abolitionist. How did white southerners deal with that? I will be presenting this essay to the Southern Historical Association as part of the panel "What Does Africa Mean to Me? Africa and Antebellum African-American Identity" at 9:30 am, Friday, November 14 (session #3). http://sha.uga.edu/2014%20Program%20for%20Web.pdf
dueling specs, 2018
It's the end of the semester, so that means it's time to duel!
This is a project in my African American history survey focusing on the contemporary and modern r... more This is a project in my African American history survey focusing on the contemporary and modern responses to the Moynihan Report. I welcome any feedback, but no trolls, please.
What the Abolitionists Were Up Against, Revisited, 2020
Antislavery activists in the 19th century United States faced a set of formidable obstacles in mo... more Antislavery activists in the 19th century United States faced a set of formidable obstacles in moving the needle of northern popular opinion from apathy (at best) to engagement. This essay explores the hostile landscape of American social, political, and cultural life within which antislavery writers operated. They could not ignore these conditions if they were going to appeal to their largely northern, middle class audience: they had to assuage their concerns, prompt them to question assumptions, and force them to question conventional wisdom. But northern middle-class culture also provided antislavery activists with opportunities. Pushing the right buttons had the potential to transform hostility and apathy into interest and, maybe, enthusiasm in the fight against slavery. This essay does not show how antislavery women and wen pushed those buttons, but it does identify them and explores their potential to turn a culture of indifference into a culture of antislavery.