Rights and Value: Construing the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Civil Commons (original) (raw)

Authors

• Giorgio Baruchello Háskólinn á Akureyri / University of Akureyri
• Rachael Lorna Johnstone Háskólinn á Akureyri / University of Akureyri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v5i1.994

Keywords:

commons, rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, civil commons

Abstract

This article brings together the United Nations’ International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and John McMurtry’s theory of value. In this perspective, the ICESCR is construed as a prime example of “civil commons,” while McMurtry’s theory of value is proposed as a tool of interpretation of the covenant. In particular, McMurtry’s theory of value is a hermeneutical device capable of highlighting: (a) what alternative conception of value systemically operates against the fulfilment of the rights enshrined in the ICESCR; (b) the increased relevance of the ICESCR with regard to the current global economic crisis; (c) the parameters to determine the degree to which the rights at issue have been realized. Reflections on environmental implications of both the ICESCR and McMurtry’s axiology conclude the article.

Issue

Section

Thematic Articles

License

Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.

The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:

• the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
• the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
• appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
• copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
• by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
• reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
• the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.