Displaying things in common to encourage friendship formation: A large randomized field experiment (original) (raw)
References
Altenburger, K.M., & Ugander, J. (2018). Monophily in social networks introduces similarity among friends-of-friends. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 284. Google Scholar
Ameri, M., Honka, E., & Xie, Y. (2017). A structural model of network dynamics: Tie formation, product adoption, and content generation. Working Paper.
Aral, S., Muchnik, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2009). Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51), 21544–21549. Google Scholar
Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2011). Creating social contagion through viral product design: a randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57(9), 1623–1639. Google Scholar
Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2012). Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 1215842.
Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2014). Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: a large-scale networked experiment. Management Science, 60(6), 1352–1370. Google Scholar
Bakshy, E., Eckles, D., Yan, R., & Rosenn, I. (2012a). Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 146–161): ACM.
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012b). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 519–528): ACM.
Bakshy, E., & Eckles, D. (2013). Uncertainty in online experiments with dependent data: an evaluation of bootstrap methods. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1303–1311): ACM.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. Google Scholar
Bala, V., & Goyal, S. (2000). A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometrica, 68(5), 1181–1229. Google Scholar
Bapna, R., & Umyarov, A. (2015). Do your online friends make you pay? a randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Science, 61(8), 1902–1920. Google Scholar
Bapna, R., Ramaprasad, J., Shmueli, G., & Umyarov, A. (2016). One-way mirrors in online dating: a randomized field experiment. Management Science, 62 (11), 3100–3122. Google Scholar
Bapna, R., Liangfei, Q., & Rice, S. (2017). Repeated interactions versus social ties: Quantifying the economic value of trust, forgiveness, and reputation using a field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 41(3).
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2016). Mindful economics: The production, consumption, and value of beliefs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 141–64. Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H.T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. The Handbook of Social Psychology.
Brzozowski, M.J., & Romero, D.M. (2011). Who should i follow? recommending people in directed social networks. In ICWSM.
Burke, M., & Kraut, R.E. (2016). The relationship between facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. Google Scholar
Bursztyn, L., Egorov, G., & Fiorin, S. (2017). From extreme to mainstream: How social norms unravel. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Centola, D. (2015). The social origins of networks and diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1295–1338. Google Scholar
Church, K.W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29. Google Scholar
Currarini, S., Jackson, M.O., & Pin, P. (2009). An economic model of friendship: homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica, 77(4), 1003–1045. Google Scholar
Currarini, S., Jackson, M.O., & Pin, P. (2010). Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(11), 4857–4861. Google Scholar
Dhar, V., Geva, T., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Sundararajan, A. (2014). Prediction in economic networks. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 264–284. Google Scholar
Eagle, N., Macy, M., & Claxton, R. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981), 1029–1031. Google Scholar
Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press.
Eckles, D., Kizilcec, R.F., & Bakshy, E. (2016). Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7316–7322. Google Scholar
Ely, J., Frankel, A., & Kamenica, E. (2015). Suspense and surprise. Journal of Political Economy, 123(1), 215–260. Google Scholar
Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: a hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 13–30.
Fischer, M.J. (2008). Does campus diversity promote friendship diversity? a look at interracial friendships in college. Social Science Quarterly, 89(3), 631–655. Google Scholar
Fisman, R., Iyengar, S.S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 673–697. Google Scholar
Fisman, R., Iyengar, S.S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2008). Racial preferences in dating. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 117–132. Google Scholar
Fleder, D., & Hosanagar, K. (2009). Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Science, 55(5), 697–712. Google Scholar
Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313. Google Scholar
Fradkin, A. (2017). Search, matching, and the role of digital marketplace design in enabling trade: Evidence from Airbnb.
Gee, L.K., Jones, J.J., Fariss, C.J., Burke, M., & Fowler, J.H. (2017). The paradox of weak ties in 55 countries. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133, 362–372. Google Scholar
Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D.J. (2010). Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 611. Google Scholar
Goel, S., & Goldstein, D.G. (2013). Predicting individual behavior with social networks. Marketing Science, 33(1), 82–93. Google Scholar
Goes, P.B., Lin, M., & Au Yeung, C.-m. (2014). “popularity effect” in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 222–238. Google Scholar
Granovetter, M.S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In Social networks (pp. 347–367): Elsevier.
Hartmann, W.R., Manchanda, P., Nair, H., Bothner, M., Dodds, P., Godes, D., Hosanagar, K., & Tucker, C. (2008). Modeling social interactions: identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Letters, 19(3-4), 287–304. Google Scholar
Hartmann, W.R. (2010). Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. Marketing Science, 29(4), 585–601. Google Scholar
Hosanagar, K., Fleder, D., Lee, D., & Buja, A. (2013). Will the global village fracture into tribes? recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Science, 60(4), 805–823. Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Singh, P. V., & Ghose, A. (2015). A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Science, 61 (12), 2825–2844. Google Scholar
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 422–447.
Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212. Google Scholar
Jackson, M.O. (2008). Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press.
Katona, Z., & Sarvary, M. (2008). Network formation and the structure of the commercial world wide web. Marketing Science, 27(5), 764–778. Google Scholar
Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405–450. Google Scholar
Kwon, H. E., Oh, W., & Kim, T. (2017). Platform structures, homing preferences, and homophilous propensities in online social networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(3), 768–802. Google Scholar
Lerman, K., Jain, P., Ghosh, R., Kang, J.-H., & Kumaraguru, P. (2013). Limited attention and centrality in social networks. In 2013 International Conference on Social Intelligence and Technology (SOCIETY) (pp. 80–89): IEEE.
Lewis, R. A., & Rao, J. M. (2015). The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1941–1973. Google Scholar
Lin, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2015). Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Science, 62(5), 1393–1414. Google Scholar
Mayzlin, D., & Yoganarasimhan, H. (2012). Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Management Science, 58(9), 1651–1668. Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. Google Scholar
Mele, A. (2017). A structural model of dense network formation. Econometrica, 85(3), 825–850. Google Scholar
Mollica, K. A., Gray, B., & Treviño, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123–136. Google Scholar
Moricz, M., Dosbayev, Y., & Berlyant, M. (2010). Pymk: friend recommendation at myspace. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data (pp. 999–1002): ACM.
Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Sundararajan, A. (2012). Recommendation networks and the long tail of electronic commerce. Mis Quarterly, 65–83.
Oestreicher-Singer, G., Libai, B., Sivan, L., Carmi, E., & Yassin, O. (2013). The network value of products. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 1–14. Google Scholar
Owen, A. B., Eckles, D., & et al. (2012). Bootstrapping data arrays of arbitrary order. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 6(3), 895–927. Google Scholar
Peng, J., Agarwal, A., Hosanagar, K., & Iyengar, R. (2018). Network overlap and content sharing on social media platforms. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 571–585. Google Scholar
Phan, T. Q., & Airoldi, E. M. (2015). A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(21), 6595–6600. Google Scholar
Phan, T. Q., & Godes, D. (2018). The evolution of influence through endogenous link formation. Marketing Science, 37(2), 259–278. Google Scholar
Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 211–239. Google Scholar
Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 & 623–656. Google Scholar
Shi, Z., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2014). Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: evidence from twitter. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 123–142. Google Scholar
Shriver, S. K., Nair, H. S., & Hofstetter, R. (2013). Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Science, 59(6), 1425–1443. Google Scholar
Su, J., Sharma, A., & Goel, S. (2016). The effect of recommendations on network structure. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1157–1167): International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
Sun, T., Viswanathan, S., & Zheleva, E. (2019). Creating social contagion through firm mediated message design: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Management Science, Forthcoming.
Sundararajan, A. (2007). Local network effects and complex network structure. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 7,(1).
Susarla, A., Oh, J. -H., & Tan, Y. (2012). Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from youtube. Information Systems Research, 23 (1), 23–41. Google Scholar
Thelwall, M. (2009). Homophily in myspace. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 219–231. Google Scholar
Toubia, O., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter? Marketing Science, 32 (3), 368–392. Google Scholar
Tucker, C. (2008). Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Science, 54(12), 2024–2038. Google Scholar
Ugander, J., Backstrom, L., Marlow, C., & Kleinberg, J. (2012). Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201116502.
Wang, C., Zhang, X., & Hann, I.-H. (2018). Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Information Systems Research.
Yadav, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Marketing in computer-mediated environments: Research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 20–40. Google Scholar
Yoganarasimhan, H. (2012). Impact of social network structure on content propagation: a study using youtube data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 10 (1), 111–150. Google Scholar