When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? A meta-analysis (original) (raw)

References

• Aitken, B., & Harrison, A. 1999. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89 (3): 605–618.
  Article Google Scholar
• Aitken, B., Hanson, G., & Harrison, A. 1997. Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behaviour. Journal of International Economics, 43 (1–2): 103–132.
  Article Google Scholar
• Aitken, B., Harrison, A., & Lipsey, R. 1996. Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela and the United States. Journal of International Economics, 40 (3–4): 345–371.
  Article Google Scholar
• Aslanoglu, E. 2000. Spillover effects of foreign direct investments on Turkish manufacturing industry. Journal of International Development, 12 (8): 1111–1130.
  Article Google Scholar
• Athukarola, P., & Chand, S. 2000. Trade orientation and productivity gains from international production: A study of overseas operation of United States TNCs. Transnational Corporations, 9 (1): 1–27.
  Google Scholar
• Balasubramanyam, V. N., Salisu, M., & Sapsford, D. 1996. Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Economic Journal, 106 (434): 92–105.
  Article Google Scholar
• Barrios, S., & Strobl, E. 2002. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Spanish experience. Review of World Economics, 138 (3): 459–481.
  Google Scholar
• Barrios, S., Dimelis, S., Louri, H., & Strobl, E. 2004. Efficiency spillovers from foreign direct investment in the EU periphery: A comparative study of Greece, Ireland and Spain. Review of World Economics, 140 (4): 687–705.
  Article Google Scholar
• Barry, F., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. 2005. Foreign direct investment and wages in domestic firms in Ireland: Productivity spillovers versus labour-market crowding out. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12 (1): 67–84.
  Article Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A., & Korn, H. J. 1996. Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry: Linking structural conditions of competition to patterns of market entry and exit. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (2): 255–291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. 2003. Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: New evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19 (3): 529–545.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J. N. 1994. Free trade: Old and new challenges. Economic Journal, 104 (423): 231–246.
  Article Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., Stahl, K., & Vaara, E. 2007. Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: The mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity and social integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 658–672.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blomström, M. 1986. Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 (1): 97–110.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. 2003. The economics of foreign direct investment incentives, NBER Working Paper 9489, National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Blomström, M., & Persson, H. 1983. Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: Evidence from the Mexican manufacturing industry. World Development, 11 (6): 493–501.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blomström, M., & Sjöholm, F. 1999. Foreign direct investment technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? European Economic Review, 43 (4–6): 915–923.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blomström, M., & Wolff, E. N. 1994. Multinational corporations and productivity convergence in Mexico. In M. Blomström & E. N. Wolff (Eds), Convergence of productivity: Cross-national studies and historical evidence: 243–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. 1998. How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45 (1): 115–135.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bosco, M. 2001. Does FDI contribute to technological spillovers and growth? A panel analysis of Hungarian firms. Transnational Corporations, 10 (1): 43–68.
  Google Scholar
• Bouoiyour, J. 2004. Foreign direct investment in Morocco. In S. Perrin & F. Sachwald (Eds), Foreign direct investment in developing countries: Leveraging the role of multinationals: 149–167. Paris: AFD.
  Google Scholar
• Bowen, H. P., & Wiersema, M. F. 2005. Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (13): 1153–1171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Wang, C. 2002. The impact of inward FDI on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (4): 637–655.
  Article Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., & Wang, C. 2007. Is the relationship between inward FDI and spillover effects linear? An empirical examination of the case of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (3): 447–459.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bwalya, M. S. 2006. Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Evidence from panel data analysis of manufacturing firms in Zambia. Journal of Development Economics, 81 (2): 514–526.
  Article Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E. 1974. Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host country markets. Economica, 41 (162): 176–193.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2006. Interdependent behavior in foreign direct investment: The multi-level effects of prior entry and prior exit on foreign market entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (5): 642–665.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-J. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1): 100–134.
  Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-J., Su, K. H., & Tsai, W. 2007. Competitive tension: The awareness–motivation–capability perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 101–118.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. L. C. 1994. On the concept of universal knowledge in organization science: Implications for cross-national research. Management Science, 40 (1): 162–168.
  Article Google Scholar
• Chuang, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-M. 1999. FDI, R&D and spillover efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Studies, 35 (4): 117–137.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.
  Article Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., & Narula, R. 2008. A novel approach to national technological accumulation and absorptive capacity: Aggregating Cohen and Levinthal. European Journal of Development Research, 20 (1): 56–73.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A. C. 2006. Who cares about corruption? Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6): 807–822.
  Article Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., Knell, M., Majcen, B., & Rojec, M. 2003. The role of FDI, R&D accumulation and trade in transferring technology to transition countries: Evidence from firm panel data for eight transition countries. Economic Systems, 27 (2): 189–204.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dawar, N., & Chattopadhyay, A. 2002. Rethinking marketing programs for emerging markets. Long Range Planning, 35 (5): 457–474.
  Article Google Scholar
• De Mello, L. R. 1997. Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: A selective survey. Journal of Development Studies, 34 (1): 1–34.
  Article Google Scholar
• De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. 2005. The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30 (2): 277–291.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dimelis, S. P. 2005. Spillovers from foreign direct investment and firm growth: Technological, financial and market structure effects. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12 (1): 85–104.
  Article Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. 2000. Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, 14 (1): 49–64.
  Article Google Scholar
• Driffield, N. 2001. The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. Manchester School, 69 (1): 103–119.
  Article Google Scholar
• Driffield, N. 2004. Regional policy and spillovers from FDI in the UK. The Annals of Regional Science, 38 (4): 579–594.
  Article Google Scholar
• Driffield, N., & Love, J. H. 2007. Linking FDI motivation and host economy productivity effects: Conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (3): 460–473.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1): 1–31.
  Article Google Scholar
• Feinberg, S. E., & Majumdar, S. K. 2001. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 421–437.
  Article Google Scholar
• Findlay, R. 1978. Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment and transfer of technology: A simple dynamic model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92 (1): 1–16.
  Article Google Scholar
• Flôres Jr, R. G., Fontoura, M. P., & Santos, R. G. 2007. Foreign direct investment spillovers: Additional lessons from a country study. European Journal of Development Research, 19 (3): 372–390.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gershenberg, I. 1987. The training and spread of managerial know-how: A comparative analysis of multinationals and other firms in Kenya. World Development, 15 (7): 931–939.
  Article Google Scholar
• Girma, S. 2005. Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: A threshold regression analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67 (3): 281–306.
  Article Google Scholar
• Girma, S., & Görg, H. 2003. FDI spillovers and the role of absorptive capacity: Evidence from the UK using quantile regressions, IIIS Discussion Paper 1, The Institute for International and Integration Studies.
• Girma, S., Greenaway, D., & Wakelin, K. 2001. Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48 (1): 119–133.
  Article Google Scholar
• Globerman, S. 1979. Foreign direct investment and “spillover” efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 12 (1): 42–56.
  Article Google Scholar
• Görg, H., & Strobl, E. 2001. Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis with a test for publication bias. The Economic Journal, 111 (475): F723–F739.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. 1993. Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42 (1): 51–74.
  Article Google Scholar
• Halpern, L., & Muraközy, B. 2007. Does distance matter in spillover? Economics of Transition, 15 (4): 781–805.
  Article Google Scholar
• Haskel, J. E., Pereira, S., Slaughter, C., & Matthew, J. 2007. Does inward FDI boost the productivity of domestic firms? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (3): 482–496.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. 1998. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3 (4): 486–504.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. 1958. The strategy of economic development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B. M., Maskus, K. E., & Saggi, K. 2005. Transfer of technology to developing countries: Unilateral and multilateral options. World Development, 33 (10): 1587–1602.
  Article Google Scholar
• Huff, A. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Imbriani, C., & Reganati, F. 2003. The effects of direct investments on local firms: Some evidence from panel data for the Italian manufacturing sector, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Social Sciences, June, www.hicsocial.org:16080/Social2003Proceedings, last accessed February 2009.
• Javorcik, B. S. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. The American Economic Review, 94 (3): 605–627.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jordaan, J. 2005. Determinants of FDI-induced externalities: New empirical evidence for Mexican manufacturing industries. World Development, 33 (12): 2103–2118.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. K. 2004. Traditional and non-traditional determinants of foreign direct investment in developing countries. Journal of Applied Business Research, 20 (1): 43–50.
  Google Scholar
• Karpaty, P., & Lundberg, L. 2004. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in Swedish manufacturing, FIEF Working Paper 194, Trade Union Institute for Economic Research.
• Kathuria, V. 2000. Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms. Journal of International Development, 12 (3): 334–369.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kathuria, V. 2001. Foreign firms, technology transfer and knowledge spillovers to Indian manufacturing industries: A stochastic frontier analysis. Applied Economics, 33 (5): 625–642.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keller, W. 1996. Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development. Journal of Development Economics, 49 (1): 199–227.
  Article Google Scholar
• Keller, W., & Yeaple, S. 2003. Multinational enterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: Firm level evidence from the United States, Working Paper 9504, National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 2000. The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 268–285.
  Article Google Scholar
• Khawar, M. 2003. Productivity and foreign direct investment: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Economics Studies, 30 (1): 66–76.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, Y. 2001. R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: Innovation and absorptive capacity, Discussion Paper 2775, Center for Economic Policy Research.
• Kokko, A. 1992. Foreign direct investment, host country characteristics, and spillovers, Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics.
• Kokko, A. 1994. Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43 (2): 279–293.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kokko, A. 1996. Productivity spillovers from competition between local firms and foreign affiliates. Journal of International Development, 8 (4): 517–530.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kokko, A., Tasini, R., & Zejan, M. 1996. Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. Journal of Development Studies, 32 (4): 602–611.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kokko, A., Tasini, R., & Zejan, M. 2001. Trade regimes and spillover effects of FDI: Evidence from Uruguay. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137 (1): 124–149.
  Article Google Scholar
• Konings, J. 2001. The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms: Evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies. Economics of Transition, 9 (3): 619–633.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kotabe, M., Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., & Mishra, H. A. 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2): 259–282.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lai, M. Y., Peng, S. J., & Bao, Q. 2006. Technology spillovers, absorptive capacity and economic growth. China Economic Review, 17 (3): 300–320.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lall, S. 1978. Transnationals, domestic enterprises and industrial structure in LDSs: A survey. Oxford Economic Papers, 30 (2): 217–248.
  Google Scholar
• Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnic, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. 1992. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 327 (4): 248–254.
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2002. Foreign direct investment and technology spillover: Evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30 (3): 579–602.
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2008. Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 85 (1–2): 176–193.
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. 2000. Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from UK industry level panel data. Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (3): 407–425.
  Article Google Scholar
• London, T., & Hart, S. L. 2004. Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5): 350–370.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, J. 2005. The absorptive capacity of South African automotive component suppliers. World Development, 33 (7): 1153–1182.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. 2002. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31 (2): 213–231.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lutz, S., & Talavera, O. 2004. Do Ukrainian firms benefit from FDI? Economics of Planning, 37 (2): 77–98.
  Google Scholar
• Lyles, M. A., & Salk, J. 1996. Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (5): 877–903.
  Article Google Scholar
• Merlevede, B., & Schoors, K. 2008. How and by how much does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? Mimeo, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University.
• Meyer, K. E. 2004. Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (4): 259–277.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (2): 119–137.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. E. 2007. Contextualizing organizational learning: Lyles and Salk in the context of their research. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 27–37.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. E. (Ed.) 2008. Multinational enterprises and host economies. Cheltenham: Elgar.
  Book Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. 2009. Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1): 61–80.
  Article Google Scholar
• Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (6): 586–599.
  Article Google Scholar
• Murakami, Y. 2007. Technology spillover from foreign-owned firms in Japanese manufacturing industry. Journal of Asian Economics, 18 (2): 284–293.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. 1993. National systems of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Norton.
  Book Google Scholar
• Peng, M.W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2): 275–296.
• Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based on view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5): 920–936.
  Article Google Scholar
• Perez, T. 1997. Multinational enterprises and technological spillovers: An evolutionary model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7 (2): 169–192.
  Article Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. 2004. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  Google Scholar
• Rattsø, J., & Stokke, E. H. 2003. Learning and foreign technology spillovers in Thailand: Empirical evidence on productivity dynamics. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 29 (1): 47–66.
  Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. 2004. Absorptive capacity and economic growth: How do countries catch up? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28 (4): 577–596.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, P. M. 1994. When can management science research be generalized internationally? Management Science, 40 (1): 28–39.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ruane, F., & Ugur, A. 2005. Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in Irish manufacturing industry: Evidence from plant level panel data. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12 (1): 53–66.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: Economics of internal markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Schoors, K., & van der Tol, B. 2002. Foreign direct investment spillovers within and between sectors: Evidence from Hungarian data, Working Paper 157, Ghent University, Belgium.
• Sgard, J. 2001. Direct foreign investments and productivity growth in Hungarian firms, 1992–1999, CEPII Working Paper 19.
• Sinani, E., & Meyer, K. E. 2004. Spillovers from technology transfer: The case of Estonia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32 (3): 445–466.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sjöholm, F. 1999. Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: Evidence from establishment data. Journal of Development Studies, 36 (1): 53–73.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smarzynska, B. K., & Wei, S. 2000. Corruption and composition of foreign direct investment: Firm-level evidence, Working Paper 7969, National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Smith, K. G., Ferrier, W., & Ndofor, H. 2001. Competitive dynamics research: Critique and future directions. In M. A. Hitt, R. Freeman & J. Harrison (Eds), Blackwell handbook of strategic management: 315–361. London: Blackwell.
  Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J., & Chen, M.-J. 1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the US domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1): 60–85.
  Article Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. W. 2008. The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: Horizontal spillovers and crowding out effects in developing countries. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2): 341–361.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. D., & Jarrell, S. B. 1989. Meta-regression analysis: A quantitative method of literature surveys. Journal of Economic Surveys, 3 (1): 54–67.
  Google Scholar
• Takii, S. 2005. Productivity spillovers and characteristics of foreign multinational plants in Indonesian manufacturing 1990–1995. Journal of Development Economics, 76 (2): 521–542.
  Article Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. G., & Sharp, S. J. 1999. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18 (20): 2693–2708.
  Article Google Scholar
• Thuy, T. L. 2005. Technological spillovers from foreign direct investment: The case of Vietnam, Mimeo, Graduate School of Economics, University of Tokyo.
• Tian, X. 2007. Accounting for sources of FDI technology spillovers: Evidence from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (1): 147–159.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (4): 491–513.
  Article Google Scholar
• Tung, R., & van Witteloostuijn, A. 2008. What makes a study sufficiently international? Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (2): 180–183.
  Article Google Scholar
• Vahter, P., & Masso, J. 2007. Home versus host country effects of FDI: Searching for new evidence of productivity spillovers. Applied Economics Quarterly, 53 (2): 165–196.
  Google Scholar
• Voyer, P. A., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. The effect of corruption on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50 (3): 211–224.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, J. Y., & Blomström, M. 1992. Foreign investment and technology transfer: A simple model. European Economic Review, 36 (1): 137–155.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Yu, L. 2007. Do spillover benefits grow with rising foreign direct investment? An empirical examination of the case of China. Applied Economics, 39 (3): 397–405.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wei, Y., & Liu, X. 2003. Productivity spillovers among OECD, diaspora and indigenous firms in Chinese manufacturing, Working Paper 2003/008, Lancaster University Management School.
• Wei, Y., & Liu, X. 2006. Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China's manufacturing sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (4): 544–557.
  Article Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. 2002. Modelling-as-theorizing: A systematic methodology for theory development. In D. Partington (Ed.) Essential skills for management research: 45–71. London: Sage Publications.
  Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1993. The East Asian miracle. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
• Xu, B. 2000. Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62 (2): 477–493.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. 2007. Rivalry between multinational enterprises: An event history approach. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (3): 665–686.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yudaeva, K., Kozlov, K., Melentieva, N., & Ponomareva, N. 2003. Does foreign ownership matter? Russian experience. Economics of Transition, 11 (3): 383–410.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185–203.
  Google Scholar
• Zukowska-Gagelmann, K. 2000. Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in Poland. Economic Systems, 24 (3): 223–256.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references