An assessment of morphogenic and transformation efficiency in a range of varieties of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) (original) (raw)

Summary

To provide a truly genotype-independent transformation system, it is necessary to be able to transform a wide range of potato genotypes. The ability to regenerate shoots in vitro was determined for 34 potato varieties using tuber disc explants. Following a culture regime used extensively in previous studies with the variety Desiree, half of the varieties could be regenerated from tuber discs and half could not. From a sample of varieties that could be regenerated from tuber discs, all but one variety gave transgenic plants. Twelve varieties were evaluated for the capacity to regenerate shoots from leaf and internode explants excised from in vitro grown plants. All of the varieties tested regenerated adventitious shoots. Leaf and internode explants from 5 varieties were subsequently used for transformation, and transgenic plants were produced from two potato varieties that did not give transgenic plants from tuber disc explants. Some varieties could not be transformed by either method, and will require modification of the in vitro regeneration and transformation system to be successful.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2,4-D:

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

GA3 :

gibberellic acid

IAA:

indole-3-acetic acid

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John Innes Centre, Colney Lane, NR4 7UJ, Norwich, U.K.
    Philip J. Dale & Kaija K. Hampson

Authors

  1. Philip J. Dale
  2. Kaija K. Hampson

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dale, P.J., Hampson, K.K. An assessment of morphogenic and transformation efficiency in a range of varieties of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Euphytica 85, 101–108 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023936

Download citation

Key words