Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity (original) (raw)
- 2848 Accesses
- 1307 Citations
- 6 Altmetric
- Explore all metrics
Summary
Various cover and cover-abundance scales are compared, together with some current transformations, including the angular transformation and logarithmic transformations. A new cover-abundance scale, being a fully numerical, extended Braun-Blanquet scale is introduced under the name ordinal scale. The transformation of cover-abundance data is discussed in terms of a general transformation function y=x wand it is shown that by applying different values of w to the ordinal scale all other scales can be approached, ranging from the presence-absence transformation for _w_=0 to to the Tüxen & Ellenberg cover scale for _w_=4.
The effect of the transformation of cover-abundance values on community similarity is shown in three examples: (1) 25 relevés of Arrhenatheretum grassland, being the exampletable used by Mueller-Dombois & Ellenberg; (2) 22 relevés of Spartinetea communities; and (3) 23 relevés of Glauco-Puccinellietalia communities, the latter two sets being taken from selections devised by the Working Group for Data-Processing. In all examples classification and ordination results obtained with intermediate transformations were superior to those obtained with either a strong weighting on mere presence, or an emphasis on dominance. This comparison was based on previous phytosociological experience.
Weighting and standardization are compared with each other. It is concluded (1) that standardization by species has effects similar to those of weighting of rare species with low cover-abundance values; (2) that standar-dization by relevé is similar to weighting the dominant species; and (3) that no standardization and intermediate weighting are hence similar in effect.
It is stated that the relations between weighting and standardization are insufficiently studied and need more attention. A general formula for applying both forms of transformation is presented: y=a x w.
It is supposed that the effect of the amount of weighting will depend on the heterogeneity level of the data-set under study. Indeed some indications were found that weighting the dominant species may help distinguishing lower syntaxonomical units, especially facies, and also higher units, even up to the class level if the communities are characterized by one or a few dominant species.
Some remarks are made on the possible ecological background of the effects of weighting. It is argued that biological (reproduction) processes responsible for the performance of a species are of an exponential nature. Two performance types may be distinguished, viz. the abundance type and the dominance type. Both types may be approached with logarithmic scales.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- AustinM.P. & P.Greig-Smith, 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. II. Some methodological problems of data from rain forest. J. Ecol. 56: 827–844.
Article Google Scholar - BaileyA.W. & C.E.Poulton, 1968. Plant communities and environmental relationship in a portion of the Tillamook burn, Northwestern Oregon. Ecology: 49: 1–13.
Article Google Scholar - BannisterP. 1966. The use of subjective estimates of coverabundance as the basis for ordination. J. Ecol. 54: 665–674.
Article Google Scholar - BaumB.R. 1977. Reduction of dimensionality for heuristic purposes. Taxon 26: 791–795.
Article Google Scholar - BeckingR.W. (1957). The Zürich-Montpellier school of phytosociology. Bot. Rev. 23: 411–488.
Article Google Scholar - Braun-BlanquetJ. 1946. Über den Deckungswert der Arten in den Pflanzengesellschaften der Ordnung Vaccinio-Piceetalia. Jahresber. Naturforsch. Ges. Graubündens 130: 115–119.
Google Scholar - Braun-BlanquetJ. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. Springer, Wien, New York. XIV + 865 pp.
Google Scholar - Braun-BlanquetJ. 1965. Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. Transl. rev. and ed. by C.D.Fuller & H.S.Conard, Hafner, London, 439 pp.
Google Scholar - CampbellB.M.: 1978. Similarity coefficients for classifying relevés. Vegetatio 37: 101–109.
Article Google Scholar - CoetzeeB.J. & M.J.A.Werger, 1973. On hierarchical syndrome analysis and the Zürich-Montpellier table method. Bothalia 11: 159–164.
Article Google Scholar - CurtisJ.T. & R.P.McIntosh. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the prairic-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476–496.
Article Google Scholar - DagnelieP. 1960. Contribution à l'étude des communautés végétales par l'analyse factorielle. Bull. Service Carte Phytogéogr. CNRS B-5: 7–71, 93–195.
Google Scholar - DaubenmireR. 1968. Plant communities. A textbook of plant synecology. Harper & Row, New York. XI + 300 pp.
Google Scholar - Doing KraftH. 1954. l'Analyse des carrés permanents. Acta Bot. Neerl. 3: 421–425.
Article Google Scholar - EllenbergH. 1956. Aufgaben und Methoden der Vegetationskunde. Ulmer, Stuttgart. 136 pp.
Google Scholar - EtterH. 1949. De l'analyse statistique des tableaux de végétation. Vegetatio 1: 147–154.
Article Google Scholar - FeoliE. 1977. A criterion for monothetic classification of phytosociological entities on the basis of species ordination. Vegetatio 33: 147–152.
Google Scholar - FrescoL.F.M. 1969. Q-type factor analysis as a method in synecological research. Acta Bot. Neerl. 18: 477–482.
Article Google Scholar - GoodallD.W. 1953–1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. I, II and III. Austr. J. Bot. 1: 39–63, 1: 434–456, 2: 304–324.
Google Scholar - GoodallD.W. 1969. A procedure for recognition of uncommon species combinations in sets of vegetation samples. Vegetatio 18: 19–35.
Article Google Scholar - Hogeweg, P. 1976. Topics in biological pattern analysis. Thesis Utrecht, 208 pp.
- JensénS. 1978. Influences of transformation of cover values on classification and ordination of lake vegetation. Vegetatio 37: 19–31.
Google Scholar - KortekaasW.M., E.van derMaarel & W.G.Beeftink. 1976. A numerical classification of European Spartina communities. Vegetatio 33: 51–60.
Article Google Scholar - KrajinaV.J. 1960. Can we find a common platform for the different schoolt of forest-type classification? Silva Fenn. 105: 50–59.
Google Scholar - Lausi, D., W.G. Beeftink & W.M. Kortekaas, 1979. Survey of salt marsh relevés, selected for the Working-Group for Data-Processing in Phytosociology. In prep.
- Londo, G. 1971. Patroon en proces in duinvalleivegetaties langs een gegraven meer in de Kennemerduinen. (With summary). Thesis Nijmegen. 279 pp.
- LondoG. 1976. The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio 33: 61–64.
Article Google Scholar - Maarel, E. van der 1966. Over vegetatiestructuren,-relaties en-systemen, in het bijzonder in de duingraslanden van Voorne. (With summary). Thesis Utrecht, 170 pp.
- MaarelE.van der 1969. On the use of ordination models in phytosociology. Vegetatio 19: 21–46.
Article Google Scholar - Maarel, E. van der 1972. On the transformation of cover-abundance values in photosociology. Report Botanical Laboratory, Nijmegen, 12 pp.
- MaarelE.van der 1972a. Ordination of plant communities on the basis of their plant genus, family and order relationships. In E.van derMaarel & R.Tüxen (ed) Grundfragen und Methoden der Pflanzensoziologie. Ber. Int. Symp. Rinteln 1970, p. 183–192. Junk, Den Haag.
Chapter Google Scholar - MaarelE.van der 1979. Multivariate methods in phytosociology with reference to the Netherlands. In M.J.A.Werger (ed.) The science of vegetation, p. 161–225. Junk, The Hague.
Google Scholar - MaarelE.van der & L.F.M.Fresco. 1975. Zusammenhänge zwischen Vegetation und Substrat erläutert an Ordinations-modellen. In: Vegetation und Substrat. Ber. Int. Symp. Rinteln 1969, p. 233–253. Cramer, Vaduz.
Google Scholar - MaarelE.van der, J.G.M.Janssen & J.M.W.Louppen. 1978. TABORD, a program for structuring phytosociological tables. Vegetatio 38: 143–156.
Article Google Scholar - MaarelE.van der, L.Orlóci & S.Pignatti. 1976. Data-processing in phytosociology, retrospeet and anticipation. Vegetatio 32: 65–72.
Article Google Scholar - Meyer DreesE. 1949. Combined taxation and presence in analysing and comparing association tables. Vegetatio 2: 43–46.
Article Google Scholar - Moore, J.J. 1966. PHYTO. Re-arranging a phytosociological array according to the principles of Braun-Blanquet. Programs in Fortran II. Mimeogr. Paper Dublin. 4 pp.
- Mueller-DomboisD. & H.Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, XXX + 547 pp.
Google Scholar - Noy-MeirI. 1973. Data transformation in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centering. J. Ecol. 61: 329–341.
Article Google Scholar - Noy-MeirI.D. Walker & W.T.Williams, 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.
Article Google Scholar - OrlóciL. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague. IX + 451 pp.
Google Scholar - Noy-MeirI. & R.H.Whittaker. 1978: Recent developments in continuous multivariate techniques. In R.H.Whittaker (ed), Ordination of plant communities, p. 337–378, Junk, The Hague.
Chapter Google Scholar - Roskam, E. 1971. Programme ORDINA: Multidimensional ordination of observation vectors. Programma Bull. 16, Psychology Lab. Nijmegen, 8 pp.
- SchmidP. & N.Kuhn. 1970. Automatische Ordination von Vegetationsaufnahmen in pflanzensoziologischen Tabellen. Naturwissenschaften 57: 462.
Article Google Scholar - SchwickerathM. 1931. Die Gruppenabundanz (Gruppenmächtigkeit); ein Beitrag zur Begriffsbildung in der Pflanzensoziologie. Englers Bot. Jahrb. 64: 1–16.
Google Scholar - SchwickerathM. 1938. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gruppenmächtigkeit der Assoziation. Englers Bot. Jahrb. 68: 497–514.
Google Scholar - SchwickerathM. 1940. Die Artmächtigkeit. Fedde Rep. Beih. 121: 48–52.
Google Scholar - SegalS. & V.Westhoff. 1950. Die vegetationskundliche Stellung von Carex buxbaumii in Europa, besonders in den Niederlanden. Acta Bot. Neerl. 8: 304–329.
Article Google Scholar - ShimweliD.W. 1971. The description and classification of vegetation. Sidgwick & Jackson, London, XIV + 322 pp.
Google Scholar - Sissingh, G. 1950. Onkruid-associaties in Nederland (With French summary). Thesis Wageningen, 224 pp. + hijl.
- SmartP.F.M., S.E.Meacock & J.M.Lambert. 1976. Investigations into the properties of quantitative vegetational data. II. Further data type comparisons. J. Ecol. 64: 47–78.
Google Scholar - TüxenR. & H.Ellenberg. 1937. Der systematische und ökologische Gruppenwert. Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsbildung und Methodik der Pflanzensoziologie. Mitt. Flor.-Soz. Arbeitsgem. 3: 171–184.
Google Scholar - Westhoff, V. 1947. The vegetation of dunes and salt marshes on the Dutch islands of Terschelling, Vlieland and Texel Thesis Utrecht, 131 pp.
- WesthoffV. & E.van derMaarel. 1978. The Braun-Blanquet approach. 2nd ed. In: R.H.Whittaker (ed). Classification of plant communities, p. 287–399. Junk, The Hague.
Chapter Google Scholar - WilliamsW.T. & J.M.Lambert. 1959. Multivariate methods in plant ecology. I. Association analysis in plant communities. J. Ecol. 47: 83–101.
Article Google Scholar - WishartD. 1975. CLUSTAN 1c user manual. Computer Centre University College London, 124 pp.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Division of Geobotany, Toernooiveld, 6525 ED, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
E. van der Maarel
Additional information
Contribution from the Working Group for Data-Processing in Phytosociology, based on an earlier report for that group (Van der Maarel 1972).
Nomenclature of salt marsh species follows Lausi, Kortekaas, & Beeftink (1979), for names of Arrhenatheretum species sec E. Oberdorfer, 1970, Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Süddeutschland, 3. Aufl. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
This paper was partly prepared during my stays at the Växtekologiska Institutionen at Lund under NFR grant B 252605. I thank Prof. Nils Malmer, Head of this institute for his interest in my numerical approaches in phytosociology and Dr. Sven Jensén of the same institute for valuable discussions on data transformation. Of my own department I thank Sophie Hochstenbach for preparation of the numerical results and Jo Louppen for technical help and discussions concerning the computer programs involved. Finally I thank Drs. László Orlóci and Mike Austin for useful comments on the manuscript, and Dr. Dicky Clymo for discussions on transformation formulae and his permission to mention an unpublished formula.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Maarel, E. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity.Vegetatio 39, 97–114 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052021
- Accepted: 20 November 1978
- Published: 01 May 1979
- Issue date: May 1979
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00052021