Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study (original) (raw)
Abstract
There are several invariant features of pointto-point human arm movements: trajectories tend to be straight, smooth, and have bell-shaped velocity profiles. One approach to accounting for these data is via optimization theory; a movement is specified implicitly as the optimum of a cost function, e.g., integrated jerk or torque change. Optimization models of trajectory planning, as well as models not phrased in the optimization framework, generally fall into two main groups-those specified in kinematic coordinates and those specified in dynamic coordinates. To distinguish between these two possibilities we have studied the effects of artificial visual feedback on planar two-joint arm movements. During self-paced point-to-point arm movements the visual feedback of hand position was altered so as to increase the perceived curvature of the movement. The perturbation was zero at both ends of the movement and reached a maximum at the midpoint of the movement. Cost functions specified by hand coordinate kinematics predict adaptation to increased curvature so as to reduce the visual curvature, while dynamically specified cost functions predict no adaptation in the underlying trajectory planner, provided the final goal of the movement can still be achieved. We also studied the effects of reducing the perceived curvature in transverse movements, which are normally slightly curved. Adaptation should be seen in this condition only if the desired trajectory is both specified in kinematic coordinates and actually curved. Increasing the perceived curvature of normally straight sagittal movements led to significant (P<0.001) corrective adaptation in the curvature of the actual hand movement; the hand movement became curved, thereby reducing the visually perceived curvature. Increasing the curvature of the normally curved transverse movements produced a significant (_P_<0.01) corrective adaptation; the hand movement became straighter, thereby again reducing the visually perceived curvature. When the curvature of naturally curved transverse movements was reduced, there was no significant adaptation (_P_>0.05). The results of the curvature-increasing study suggest that trajectories are planned in visually based kinematic coordinates. The results of the curvature-reducing study suggest that the desired trajectory is straight in visual space. These results are incompatible with purely dynamicbased models such as the minimum torque change model. We suggest that spatial perception-as mediated by vision-plays a fundamental role in trajectory planning.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Bennett DJ, Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Hunter IW (1992) Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 88:433–442
Google Scholar - Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, London
Google Scholar - Bizzi E, Polit A, Morasso P (1976) Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position. J Neurosci 39:435–444
Google Scholar - Bizzi E, Accornerro N, Chappie B, Hogan N (1984) Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. J Neurosci 4:2738–2744
Google Scholar - Bryson AE, Ho YC, (1975) Applied optimal control. Wiley, New York
Google Scholar - Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95:49–90
Google Scholar - Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–36
Google Scholar - Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial maps suggest a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol 15:3:493–506
Google Scholar - Flash T (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biol Cybern 57:257–274
Google Scholar - Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The co-ordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Foley JM (1980) Binocular distance perception. Psychol Rev 87:5:411–434
Google Scholar - Ghez C, Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Christakos CN, Cooper SE (1990) Roles of proprioceptive input in the programming of arm trajectories. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:837–847
Google Scholar - Gurevich I (1993) Strategies of motor adaptation to external loads during planar two-jointed movement. PhD Thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, The Weizmann Institute of Science
- Hasan Z (1986) Optimized movement trajectories and joint stiffness in unperturbed, inertially loaded movements. Biol Cybern 53:373–382
Google Scholar - Held R, Efstathiou A, Greene M (1966) Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. J Exp Psychol 72:887–891
Google Scholar - Helmholtz H (1925) Treatise on physiological optics (1867). Optical Society of America, Rochester, N.Y.
Google Scholar - Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4:2745–2754
Google Scholar - Hollerbach JM, Atkeson CG (1987) Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: pitfalls and possibilities. Biol Cybern 56:279–292
Google Scholar - Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1989) Trajectories of reaches to prismatically-displaced targets: evidence for ‘automatic’ visuomotor recalibration. Exp Brain Res 78:575–587
Google Scholar - Jordan MI, Rumelhart DE (1992) Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Sci 16:307–354
Google Scholar - Jordan MI, Flash T, Arnon Y (1994) A model of the learning of arm trajectories from spatial targets. J Cog Neurosci 6:359–376
Google Scholar - Katayama M, Kawato M (1992) Virtual trajectory and stiffness ellipse during multijoint movements predicted by neural inverse models. ATR Tech Rep TR-A-0144
- Kawato M (1990) Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning. In: Eckmiller R (eds) Advanced neural computers. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 365–372
Google Scholar - Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203:1029–1031
Google Scholar - Kuperstein M (1988) Neural model of adaptive hand-eye coordination for single postures. Science 239:1308–1311
Google Scholar - Lackner JR, DiZio P (1993) Factors contributing to initial reaching errors and adaptation to coriolis force pertubations. Soc Neurosci Abst 19:1595–655.9
Google Scholar - Miller WT (1987) Sensor-based control of robotic manipulators using a general learning algorithm. IEEE J Rob Automat 3:157–165
Google Scholar - Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Nelson WL (1983) Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 46:135–147
Google Scholar - Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:5:3208–3224
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R (1989) Formation and control of optimal trajectories in human multijoint arm movements: minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern 61:89–101
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Welch RB (1986) Adaptation of space perception. In: Boff KR Kaufman L, Thomas JP Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1. Wiley and Sons, New York, Chap 24, pp pp1-37
- Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1994) Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98:153–156
Google Scholar
Author information
Author notes
- Daniel M. Wolpert
Present address: Department of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG, London, UK
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, E10-219 MIT, 02139, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel M. Wolpert, Zoubin Ghahramani & Michael I. Jordan
Authors
- Daniel M. Wolpert
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Zoubin Ghahramani
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Michael I. Jordan
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z. & Jordan, M.I. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study.Exp Brain Res 103, 460–470 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241505
- Received: 07 February 1994
- Accepted: 13 October 1994
- Issue Date: November 1995
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00241505