Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect (original) (raw)
Summary
From 1985–1987, patterns of fruit and seed set were studied in a population of mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum), a clonal, self-incompatible herb found in deciduous woods in eastern North America. Mayapple flowers do not produce nectar, but depend on infrequent visits by nectar-seeking queen bumble bees for pollination. In all years female reproductive success in mayapple colonies was influenced by colony size (number of flowers), by the distance to neighbouring colonies and by proximity to lousewort plants (Pedicularis canadensis), a prolific nectar producer heavily visited by bumble bees. In all years fruit and seed set were greater in mayapple colonies <25 m from lousewort flowers than in matched colonies which were >50 m from lousewort. In 1985 and 1987 the frequency of queen bumble bee visits to flowers in colonies close to lousewort was about four times greater than to distant colonies. In 1986 I removed about 80% of lousewort flowers to test whether the enhanced fruit and seed set in mayapples close to lousewort was pollinator mediated. Mayapple colonies close to flowerless lousewort patches did not differ in fruit or seed set from matched colonies >50 m from lousewort. In contrast, mayapples close to flowering lousewort patches had greater fruit and seed set compared with distant colonies. Over all years, a larger proportion of mayapples close to flowering lousewort patches had enhanced fruit and seed set compared with colonies close to louseworts without flowers. Though rarely documented, this type of facilitative interaction between plants that are highly attractive to pollinators (“magnet” species), and co-flowering species that are rarely visited by pollinators, may be widespread in plant communities.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Boyden TC (1982) The pollination biology of Calypso bulbosa var. americana (Orchidaceae): initial deception of bumblebee visitors. Oecologia 55:178–184
Google Scholar - Braun EL (1967) Deciduous forests of North America. Hafner, New York, New York, USA
Google Scholar - Braun J, Brooks GR (1986) Box turtles (Terrapene carolina) as potential agents for seed dispersal. Am Midl Nat 117:312–318
Google Scholar - Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1979) Convergence, competition and mimicry in a temperate community of hummingbird pollinated flowers. Ecology 60:1022–1035
Google Scholar - Campbell DR (1985a) Pollen and gene dispersal: the influence of competition for pollination. Evolution 99:418–431
Google Scholar - Campbell DR (1985b) Pollinator sharing and seed set of Stellaria pubera: competition for pollination. Ecology 66:544–553
Google Scholar - Dafni A (1984) Mimicry and deception in pollination. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:259–278
Google Scholar - Feinsinger P, Murray KG, Kinsman S, Busby WH (1986) Floral neighborhood and pollination success in four hummingbird-pollinated cloud forest species. Ecology 67:449–464
Google Scholar - Feinsinger P (1987) Effects of plant species on each others pollination: is community structure influenced? Trends Ecol Evol 2:123–126
Google Scholar - Galen C, Gregory T (1989) Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 81:120–123
Google Scholar - Handel SN (1983) Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: Pollination Biology. Real L (ed) Academic Press, N.Y. 163–211
Google Scholar - Heinrich B (1975) Bee flowers: a hypothesis on flower variety and blooming times. Evolution 29:325–334
Google Scholar - Laverty TM, Plowright RC (1988) Fruit and seed set in Mayapple (Podophyllum peltatum): influence of intraspecific factors and local enhancement near Pedicularis canadensis. Can J Bot 66:173–178
Google Scholar - Little RJ (1983) A review of floral food deception mimicries with comments on floral mutualism. In: Handbook of Pollination Biology. CE Jones, RJ Little eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York: 294–309
Google Scholar - Macior LW (1968) Pollination adaptation in Pedicularis canadensis. Am J Bot 55:1031–1035
Google Scholar - Meijer W (1974) _Podophyllum peltatum_—may applea potential new cash crop plant of eastern North America. Econ Bot 28:68–72
Google Scholar - Melampy MN, Hayworth AG (1980) Seed production and pollen vectors in several nectarless plants. Evolution 34:1144–1154
Google Scholar - Motten AF (1986) Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community of a temperate deciduous forest. Ecological Monographs 56:21–42
Google Scholar - Nilsson LA (1980) The pollination biology of Dactylorhiza sambucina (Orchidaceae). Bot Notiser 133:367–385
Google Scholar - Parker MA (1989) Disease impact and local genetic diversity in the clonal plant Podophyllum peltatum. Evolution 43:540–547
Google Scholar - Pellmyr O (1986) The pollination ecology of two nectarless Cimicifuga sp. (Ranunculaceae) in North America. Nord J Bot 6:713–723
Google Scholar - Rathcke BJ (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollinators. In: Pollination Biology. L Real ed. Academic Press, N.Y. 305–329
Google Scholar - Rathcke BJ (1988) Interactions for pollination among co-flowering shrubs. Ecology 69:446–457
Google Scholar - Rogers RS (1982) Early spring communities in mesophytic forests in the Great Lakes region. Ecology 63:1050–1063
Google Scholar - Rust RW, Roth RR (1981) Seed production and seedling establishment in the Mayapple, Podophyllum peltatum L. Am Midl Nat 105:51–60
Google Scholar - Schemske DM, Willson MF, Melampy MM, Miller LJ, Verner L, Schemske KM, Best LB (1978) Flowering ecology of some spring woodland herbs. Ecology 59:351–366
Google Scholar - Schemske DM (1981) Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in two bee pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 62:946–954
Google Scholar - Struik GJ, Curtis JT (1962) Herb distribution in an Acer sacharum forest. Am Midl Nat 68:285–296
Google Scholar - Swanson SD, Sohmer SH (1976) The biology of Podophyllum peltatum L. (Berberidaceae), the may apple II. The transfer of pollen and success of sexual reproduction. Bull Torrey Bot Club 103:223–226
Google Scholar - Thomson JD (1978) Effect of stand composition on insect visitation in two-species mixtures of Hieracium. Am Midl Nat 100:431–440
Google Scholar - Thomson JD (1981) Spatial and temporal components of resource assessment of flower-feeding insects. J Animal Ecol 50:49–59
Google Scholar - Thomson JD (1982) Patterns of visitation by animal pollinators. Oikos 39:241–250
Google Scholar - Thomson JD (1983) Component analysis of community-level interactions in pollination systems. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Jones CE, Little RJ eds Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 451–460
Google Scholar - Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944
Google Scholar - Waser NM (1983) Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: A review of the evidence. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. CE Jones, RJ Little eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 341–359
Google Scholar - Waser NM, Real LA (1979) Effective mutualism between sequentially flowering plant species. Nature (London) 281:670–672
Google Scholar - Whistler SL, Snow AA (1990) Pollen-limited seed production in self incompatible mayapple colonies (Podophyllum peltatum). Bull Ecological Soc Am 71:403
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Ecology and Evolution Group, Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, N6A 5B7, London, Ontario, Canada
Terence M. Laverty
Authors
- Terence M. Laverty
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laverty, T.M. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect.Oecologia 89, 502–508 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317156
- Received: 25 June 1991
- Accepted: 21 November 1991
- Issue date: April 1992
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317156