The characteristics of chemically induced noise inMusca photoreceptors (original) (raw)

Summary

1. 1. Photoreceptors of_Musca_ were superfused with solutions containing either fluoride (F−), vanadate (VO −3 ), or one of the GTP analogs GPPNHP and GTPγS. These agents have been reported to generate discrete voltage fluctuations (bumps) when injected into_Limulus_ photoreceptors. All four agents produced noisy depolarizations in_Musca_ photoreceptors when added to the perfusate.
2. 1. The effects of all four agents were reversible. GPPNHP induced dark noise only after exposure to light, whereas VO −3 and F− did not require light for their effect.
3. 1. Although individual bumps were too small to be resolved, the power spectra of voltage noise induced by these agents resembled closely those of light-induced noise.
4. 1. F−-induced noise was reduced by adaptation following strong illumination. As F−-induced depolarization increased beyond 6 mV the voltage noise diminished, probably due in part to adaptation. With increasing F−-induced depolarization the power spectrum of F− noise changed shape slightly. Part of this change was probably due to adaptation, and it was similar to but smaller than corresponding changes in the spectrum of light-induced noise.
5. 1. Analysis of F−-induced noise indicated that it was composed of bumps which, though similar in time course, were not identical to light-induced bumps. At small depolarizations, the F−-induced bumps were calculated to be 3–5 times smaller than light bumps and were less strongly affected by adaptation. Although the calculated duration of light-induced bumps diminished as intensity increased, the duration of F−-induced bumps showed no such dependence on depolarization, and was equal to that of light bumps in moderately dim light. Moreover light- and F-induced noise did not summate in the manner expected if they were indistinguishable to the photoreceptor.
6. 1. In addition to noise, we saw other effects as well. The earliest effect of VO −3 was a smooth depolarization which may have been due to this ion's role as a Na/K pump inhibitor. In experiments with some of these agents strong light caused a wave of afterdepolarization with no increase in noise. This effect occurred under a variety of conditions, however, and was not specific to the agents used.
7. 1. F−, VO −3 GPPNHP and GTPγS appear to generate noise in_Musca_ photoreceptors through a common effect on the pathway of phototransduction. In the case of F− in particular, chemically induced bumps are smaller and less affected by adaptation than those produced by light. We discuss possible mechanisms of action consistent with these findings.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

GPPNHP :

guanylyl imidodiphosphate

GTPγS :

guanosine-5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate)

RMS :

root mean square

References

• Armon E, Minke B (1983) Light activated electrogenic Na+ -Ca++ exchange in fly photoreceptors: modulation by Na+/ K+ pump activity. Biophys Struct Mech 9:349–357
  Google Scholar
• Bacigalupo J, Lisman JE (1983) Single-channel currents activated by light in_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. Nature 304:268–270
  Google Scholar
• Bolsover SR, Brown JE (1980) Guanosine phosphates and the control of membrane potential in_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. Biol Bull 159:480
  Google Scholar
• Bolsover SR, Brown JE (1981) GTP and GTP analogs mimic some aspects of the light response in_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. Biophys J 33:206a
  Google Scholar
• Bolsover SR, Brown JE (1982) Injection of guanosine and adenosine nucleotides into_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptor cells. J Physiol (Lond) 332:325–342
  Google Scholar
• Borsellino A, Fuortes MGF (1968) Responses to single photons in visual cells of_Limulus_. J Physiol (Lond) 196:507–539
  Google Scholar
• Brown JE, Bolsover SR, Malbin C (1981) Is a GTP binding site, analogous to that of vertebrate adenylate cyclase, involved in excitation of_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptor? Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 20 (Suppl) 233
  Google Scholar
• Cassel D, Selinger Z (1977) Mechanism of adenylate cyclase activation by cholera toxin: inhibition of GTP hydrolysis at regulatory site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3307–3311
  Google Scholar
• Corson DW, Fein A (1983) Chemical excitation of_Limulus_ photoreceptors. I. Phosphatase inhibitors induce discretewave production in the dark. J Gen Physiol 82:639–657
  Google Scholar
• Corson DW, Fein A, Walthall WW (1983) Chemical excitation of_Limulus_ photoreceptors. II. Vanadate, GTP-γ-S, and fluoride prolong excitation evoked by dim flashes of light. J Gen Physiol 82:659–677
  Google Scholar
• Dodge FA, Knight BW, Toyoda J (1969) Voltage noise in_Limulus_ visual cells. Science 160:88–90
  Google Scholar
• Eckstein F, Cassel D, Levkovitz H, Lowe M, Selinger Z (1979) Guanosine-5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) an inhibitor of adenylate cyclase Stimulation by guanine nucleotides and fluoride ions. J Biol Chem 254:9829–9834
  Google Scholar
• Fein A, Corson W (1979) Both photons and fluoride ions excite_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. Science 204:77–79
  Google Scholar
• Fein A, Corson W (1981a) Excitation of_Limulus_ photoreceptors by vanadate and by a hydrolysis-resistant analog of guanosine triphosphate. Science 212:555–557
  Google Scholar
• Fein A, Corson W (1981b) A GTP-binding protein is involved in visual excitation of_Limulus_ photoreceptors: pharmacological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 20 (Suppl) 233
  Google Scholar
• Fuortes MGF, O'Brian PM (1972) Responses to single photons. In: Fuortes MGF (ed) Physiology of photoreceptor organs (Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/2). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 321–338
  Google Scholar
• Goldring MA, Lisman JE (1983) Single photon transduction in_Limulus_ photoreceptors and the Borsellino-Fuortes model. IEEE Transactions on systems man and cybernetics, SMC-13:727–731
  Google Scholar
• Hardie RC (1979) Electrophysical analysis of fly retina I: Comparative properties of R1–6 and R7 and 8. J Comp Physiol 129:19–33
  Google Scholar
• Hardie RC, Franceschini N, McIntyre PD (1979) Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina II: spectral and polarization sensitivity in R7 and R8. J Comp Physiol 133:23–39
  Google Scholar
• Katz B, Miledi R (1972) The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol (Lond) 224:665–699
  Google Scholar
• Knight BW (1972) Some point processes in motor and sensory neurophysiology. In: Lewis PAW (ed) Stochastic point processes: Statistical analysis, theory and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 732–755
  Google Scholar
• Laughlin SB, Hardie RC (1978) Common strategy for light adaptation in the peripheral visual systems of fly and dragonfly. J Comp Physiol 128:319–340
  Google Scholar
• Lillywhite PG (1977) Single photon signals and transduction in an insect eye. J Comp Physiol 122:189–200
  Google Scholar
• Lisman JE, Brown JE (1972) The effects of intracellular iontophoretic injection of calcium and sodium ions on the light response of_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 59:701–719
  Google Scholar
• Lisman JE, Fain GL, O'Day PM (1982) Voltage-dependent conductances in_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 79:187–209
  Google Scholar
• Macara IG (1980) Vanadate — an element in search of a role. TIBS 92–94
• Martin AR (1955) A further study of the statistical composition of the endplate potential. J Physiol (Lond) 130:114–122
  Google Scholar
• Martin AR (1976) The effect of membrane capacitance on nonlinear summation of synaptic potentials. J Theor Biol 59:179–187
  Google Scholar
• Minke B (1982) Light-induced reduction in excitation efficiency in_trp_ mutant of_Drosophila_. J Gen Physiol 79:361–385
  Google Scholar
• Minke B, Wu C-F, Pak WL (1975) Isolation of light-induced responses of the central retinula cells from the electroretinogram of_Drosophila_. J Comp Physiol 98:345–355
  Google Scholar
• Neher E, Stevens CF (1977) Conductance fluctuations and ionic pores in membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 6:345–381
  Google Scholar
• Pak WL (1979) Study of photoreceptor function using_Drosophila_ mutants. In: Breakefield X (ed) Neurogenetics: Genetic approaches to the nervous system. Elsevier North-Holland, New York, pp 68–69
  Google Scholar
• Payne R (1981) Suppression of noise in a photoreceptor by oxidative metabolism. J Comp Physiol 142:181–188
  Google Scholar
• Payne R (1982) Fluoride blocks inactivation step of transduction in a locust photoreceptor. J Physiol (Lond) 325:261–279
  Google Scholar
• Rice SO (1944) Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell Tel Syst J 23:282–332
  Google Scholar
• Schwabe U, Puchstein C, Hannemann H, Sochtig E (1979) Activation of adenylate cyclase by vanadate. Nature 277:143–145
  Google Scholar
• Stephenson RS, Minke B (1982) Characteristics of chemically induced noise in photoreceptors of the fly. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 22 (Suppl): 275 (Abstract)
  Google Scholar
• Stephenson RS, O'Tousa J, Scavarda NJ, Randell LL, Pak WL (1983)Drosophila mutants with reduced rhodopsin content. In: Cosens DJ, Vince-Price D (eds) Soc Exp Biol Symp XXXVI: The biology of photoreception, pp 477–501
• Stern JH, Lisman JE (1982) Internal dialysis of_Limulus_ ventral photoreceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:7580–7584
  Google Scholar
• Stevens CF (1976) A comment on Martin's relation. Biophys J 16:891–895
  Google Scholar
• Wilcox MJ (1980) The ionic mechanism of the photoreceptor in mutant and wildtype_Drosophila melanogaster_. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, W. Lafayette
  Google Scholar
• Wilcox M, Franceschini N (1984) Illumination induces dye incorporation in photoreceptor cells. Science 225:851–853
  Google Scholar
• Wong F (1978) Nature of light-induced conductance changes in ventral photoreceptors of_Limulus_. Nature 276:76–79
  Google Scholar
• Wong F, Knight BW (1980) Adapting-bump model for eccentric cells of_Limulus_. J Gen Physiol 76:339–557
  Google Scholar
• Wong F, Knight BW, Dodge FA (1982) Adapting bump model for ventral photoreceptors of_Limulus_. J Gen Physiol 79:1089–1113
  Google Scholar
• Wu CF, Pak WL (1978) Light-induced voltage noise in the photoreceptor of_Drosophila melanogaster_. J Gen Physiol 71:249–268
  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Physiology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
   Baruch Minke
2. Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 48202, Detroit, Michigan, USA
   Robert S. Stephenson

Authors

1. Baruch Minke
2. Robert S. Stephenson

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minke, B., Stephenson, R.S. The characteristics of chemically induced noise in_Musca_ photoreceptors.J. Comp. Physiol. 156, 339–356 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610727

Download citation

• Accepted: 26 November 1984
• Issue Date: May 1985
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610727

Keywords