Osmotropotaxis inDrosophila melanogaster (original) (raw)

• 460 Accesses
• 84 Citations
• 8 Altmetric
• 1 Mention
• Explore all metrics

Summary

Drosophila melanogaster is able to perform osmotropotaxis under open-loop conditions. With an ‘optimal’ stimulus the average turning tendency to the side of higher concentration corresponds to a circular track with radius_r_=0.8 cm. The response amplitude does not decrease within 1 or 2 h. Unilaterally antennectomized flies in an homogeneous odor field show a permanent turning tendency towards their intact side.

The smallest concentration ratio to elicit osmotropotaxis in normal flies ranges between 6∶10 and 9∶10 at high and between 2∶10 and 5∶10 at an about 50 times lower odor intensity. No negative tropotaxis (i.e. turning to the side of lower concentration) is observed, even with strong repellents.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Aceves-Piña EO, Quinn WG (1979) Learning in normal and mutant_Drosophila_ larvae. Science 206:93–96
  Google Scholar
• Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol Cybern 24:85–101
  Google Scholar
• Dudai Y (1977) Properties of learning and memory in_Drosophila melanogaster_. J Comp Physiol 114:69–89
  Google Scholar
• Dudai Y, Yan Y-N, Byers D, Quinn WG, Benzer S (1976) Dunce, a mutant of_Drosophila_ deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:1684–1688
  Google Scholar
• Ekman G, Berglund B, Berglund U, Lindvall T (1967) Perceived intensity of odor as a function of time of adaptation. Scand J Psychol 8:177–186
  Google Scholar
• Engen T (1971) Olfactory psychophysics. In: Beidler LM (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 4. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 216–244
  Google Scholar
• Fischbach KF (1979) Influence of homogeneously applied olfactory stimuli on phototaxis of_Drosophila melanogaster_. In: Gilles R (ed) Animals and environmental fitness (Abstracts). Pergamon Press, Oxford New York Toronto Sydney Paris Frankfurt, pp 91–92
  Google Scholar
• Flügge Ch (1934) Geruchliche Raumorientierung von_Drosophila melanogaster_. Z Vergl Physiol 20:463–500
  Google Scholar
• Fukushi T (1979) Properties of olfactory conditioning in the housefly,Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol 25:155–159
  Google Scholar
• Götz KG (1975) Hirnforschung am Navigationssystem der Fliegen. Naturwissenschaften 62:468–475
  Google Scholar
• Götz KG, Wenking H (1973) Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly_Drosophila_. J Comp Physiol 85:235–266
  Google Scholar
• Hangartner W (1967) Spezifität und Inaktivierung des Spurphero- mons von_Lasius fuliginosus_ Latr. und Orientierung der Arbeiterinnen im Duftfeld. Z Vergl Physiol 57:103–136
  Google Scholar
• Heisenberg M (1980) Mutants of brain structure and function: what is the significance of the mushroom bodies for behavior? In: Siddiqi O, Babu P, Hall LM, Hall J (eds) Development and Biology of_Drosophila_. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 373–390
  Google Scholar
• Kellog FE, Frizel DE, Wright RH (1962) The olfactory guidance of flying insects. 4.Drosophila. Can Entomol 94:884–888
  Google Scholar
• Kikuchi T (1973) Genetic alteration of olfactory functions in_Drosophila melanogaster_. Jpn J Gen 48:105–118
  Google Scholar
• Kühn A (1919) Die Orientierung der Tiere im Raum. Fischer, Jena
  Google Scholar
• Kramer E (1976) The orientation of walking honey-bees in odour fields with small concentration gradients. Physiol Entomol 1:27–37
  Google Scholar
• Lob J (1913) Die Tropismen. In: Winterstein H (ed) Handbuch der vergleichenden Physiologie, Bd 4. Fischer, Jena, pp 451–511
  Google Scholar
• Martin H (1965) Osmotropotaxis in the honey-bee. Nature 208:59–63
  Google Scholar
• Masuhr T, Menzel R (1972) Learning experiments on the use of side-specific information in the olfactory and visual system in the honey-bee (Apis melliferd). In: Wehner R (ed) Information processing in the visual system of arthropods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 315–321
  Google Scholar
• Otto E (1951) Untersuchungen zur Frage der geruchlichen Orientierung bei Insekten. Zool Jahrb Allg Zool Physiol 62:65–92
  Google Scholar
• Preiss R (1980) Anemotaxis im Lauf und Flug beim Schwammspinner. Versuche zur Aufklärung des Wirkungsgefüges. Doctoral thesis, L.M. Universität, München
  Google Scholar
• Quinn WG, Harris WA, Benzer S (1974) Conditioned behavior in_Drosophila melanogaster_. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:708–712
  Google Scholar
• Rodrigues V, Siddiqi O (1978) Genetic analysis of chemosensory pathway. Proc Indiana Acad Sci 87:147–160
  Google Scholar
• Schöne H (1980) Orientierung im Raum. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 64
  Google Scholar
• Tompkins L, Hall J, Hall LM (1980) Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant_Drosophila_. J Insect Physiol 26:689–697
  Google Scholar
• Traynier RMM (1968) Sex attraction in the mediterranean floor moth_Anagasta kühniella_: location of the female by the male. Can Entomol 100:5–10
  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Institut für Genetik und Mikrobiologie, Röntgenring 11, D-8700, Würzburg, Federal Republic of Germany
   Alexander Borst & Martin Heisenberg

Authors

1. Alexander Borst
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. Martin Heisenberg
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borst, A., Heisenberg, M. Osmotropotaxis in_Drosophila melanogaster_.J. Comp. Physiol. 147, 479–484 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612013

Download citation

• Accepted: 13 April 1982
• Issue Date: December 1982
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612013

Keywords