The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years (original) (raw)
- Aftalión, M.E., Mora y Araujo, M. and Noguera, F. (1985). The “Austral Plan” and Argentine public opinion.Estudio Sociológico y politico de Argentina. Buenos Aires.
- Alesina, A., Cohen, G.D. and Roubini, N. (1991). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. NBER Working Paper No. 3830, Cambridge, MA, September.
- Amor Bravo, E.M. (1987). Modelos político-económicos en España.Revista del Instituto de Estudios Economicos 2: 189–213.
Google Scholar - Beck, N. (1991). The economy and presidential approval: An information theoretical perspective. In Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
- Belluchi, P. (1984). The effect of aggregate economic conditions on the political preferences of the Italian electorate, 1953–1979.European Journal of Political Research 12: 387–412.
Google Scholar - Belluchi, P. (1991). Italian economic voting: A deviant case or making a case for better theory. In Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
- Chappell, H.W. and Keech, W.R. (1985). A new view of political accountability for economic performance.American Political Science Review 79: 10–27.
Google Scholar - Chrystal, K.A. and Alt, J. (1979). Some problems in formulating and testing a politico-economic model of the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 91: 730–736.
Google Scholar - Dinkel, H. (1982). Ein politisch-ökonomisches Modell der Bundesrepublik?Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
Google Scholar - Downs, A. (1957).An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar - Eulau, H. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1985).Economic conditions and electoral outcome. New York: Agathon.
Google Scholar - Fair, R.S. (1978). The effects of economic events on votes for president.Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 159–173.
Google Scholar - Falter, J.W. (1991).Hitlers Wähler. München: H.C. Beck.
Google Scholar - Fiorina, M.P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A microanalysis.American Journal of Political Science 22: 426–443.
Google Scholar - Fiorina, M.P. (1981).Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar - Fischer, S. and Huizinga, J. (1982). Inflation, unemployment, and public opinion polls.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 14: 1–19. Also in S. Fischer (1986),Indexing, inflation and economic policy. Cambridge, MA and London, U.K.: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar - Frey, B.S. and Garbers, H. (1972). Der Einfluss wirtschaftliche Variablen auf die Popularität der Regierung.Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 186: 281–259. (Also_Political Studies_ 19: 316–320.)
Google Scholar - Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978a). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the U.S.Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 174–183.
Google Scholar - Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978b). A politico-economic model of the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 88: 243–253.
Google Scholar - Frey, B.S and Schneider, F. (1979). An econometric model with an endogenous government sector.Public Choice 34: 29–43.
Google Scholar - Frey, B.S., and Weck-Hannemann, H. (1981). Hat Arbeitslosigkeit den Aufstieg des National-Sozialismus bewirkt?Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 196: 1–31.
Google Scholar - Galeotti, G. and Forcina, A. (1989). Political loyalties and the economy.Review of Economics and Statistics 71: 511–517. Also in Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
Google Scholar - Goodhart, C.A.E. and Bhansali, R.J. (1970). Political economy.Political Studies 18: 43–106.
Google Scholar - Guttman, J. and Shachmurove, Y. (1990). Dynamic optimization of political popularity in an empirical macroeconomic model.Public Choice 66: 51–66.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. (1979). The mass public and macroeconomic performance: The dynamics of public opinion toward unemployment and inflation.American Journal of Political Science 23: 705–731.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. (1982). On the demand for economic outcomes: Macroeconomic outcomes and mass political support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany.Journal of Politics 44: 426–462.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. (1987a).The political economy of industrial democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. (1987b).American political economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. and Fassbender, H. (Eds.) (1981).Contemporary political economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Google Scholar - Hibbs, D.A.Jr. and Vasilatos, N. (1981). Economics and politics in France: Economic performance and political support for Presidents Pompidou and Giscard d'Estain.European Journal of Political Research 9: 133–145.
Google Scholar - Høst, V. and Paldam, M. (1990). An international element in the vote? A comparative study of 17 OECD countries 1946–85.European Journal of Political Research 18: 221–239.
Google Scholar - Inoguchi, T. (1983).Gendai nikon seiji heizai no kôzun (Contemporary Japanese political economy). Tokyo: Toyo heizai shimposha.
Google Scholar - Jonung, L. and Wadensjö, E. (1979). The effects of unemployment, inflation and real income growth on government popularity in Sweden.Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 343–353.
Google Scholar - Jonung, L. and Wadensjö, E. (1987). Rational, adaptive and learning behavior of voters: Evidence from disaggregated popularity functions for Sweden.Public Choice 88: 197–210.
Google Scholar - Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity.American Political Science Review 72: 506–522.
Google Scholar - Kinder, D.R. and Kiewiet, D.R. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: The role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting.American Journal of Political Science 23: 495–527.
Google Scholar - Kinder, D.R. and D.R. Kiewiet (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case.British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161.
Google Scholar - Kirchgässner, G. (1974). Ökonometrische Untersuchungen des Einflusses der Wirtschaftslage auf die Popularität der Parteien.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 110: 409–45.
Google Scholar - Kirchgässner, G. (1976).Rationales Wählerverhalten und optimales Regierungsverhalten. University of Konstanz.
- Kirchgässner, G. (1985). Rationality, causality, and the relation between economic conditions and the popularity of parties.European Economic Review 28: 243–268. See also_Public Choice_ 45: 155–73.
Google Scholar - Kirchgässner, G. (1986). Economic conditions and the popularity of West German Parties, a survey.European Journal of Political Research 14: 421–439.
Google Scholar - Kirchgässner, G. (1991). On the relation between voting intentions and the perceptions of the general economic situation: An Empirical analysis for the Federal Republic of Germany, 1972–1986.European Journal of Political Economy 7: 497–526.
Google Scholar - Kirchgässner, G. and Wolters, J. (1987). The influence of poll results on election outcomes.Mathematical Social Sciences 13: 165–175.
Google Scholar - Kramer, G.H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.American Political Science Review 65: 131–143.
Google Scholar - Kramer, G.H. (1983). The ecological fallacy revisited: Aggregate- versus individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting.American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.
Google Scholar - Lafay, J.-D. (1981). Empirical analysis of politico-economic interaction in East European countries.Soviet Studies 33: 386–400.
Google Scholar - Lafay, J.-D. (1990). Survey of French VP-literature. For J.-L. Parodi (Ed.), Popularite Politique. P.t. collection of conference papers. Association Française de Science Politique. Paris.
Google Scholar - Leamer, E.E. (1983). Let's take the con out of econometrics.American Economic Review, 65: 31–43. Reprinted with the best part of the discussion in C.W.J. Granger (Ed.) (1990),Modelling economic time series: Readings in econometric methodology. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar - Lewin, L. (1991).Self-interest and public interest in Western politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar - Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1980). Economic conditions and executive popularity: The French experience.American Journal of Political Science 24: 306–323.
Google Scholar - Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1983). Economics and the French voter: A microanalysis.Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 347–360.
Google Scholar - Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1988).Economics and elections: The major Western democracies. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Google Scholar - Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Mitchell, G. (1990). Modelos transnacionales de voto económico: Estudio de un conjunto de países europeos.Revista del Instituto de Estudios Economicos, 4/1990: 65–81.
Google Scholar - Lybeck, J. (1985). A simultaneous model of politico-economic interaction in Sweden.European Journal of Political Research, 13: 135–151. Reprinted in Lybeck, J. (1986),The growth of governments in developed economies. Aldeshot: Gower.
Google Scholar - Markus, G.B. (1988). The impact of personal and national economic conditions on the presidential vote: A pooled cross-sectional analysis.American Journal of Political Science 32: 137–154.
Google Scholar - Miller, A.H. and Listhaug, O. (1985). Economic effects on the vote in Norway. In H. Eulau and M.S. Lewis-Beck (1985).
- Monroe, K.R. (1978). Economic influences on presidential popularity.Public Opinion Quarterly 42: 360–369.
Google Scholar - Monroe, K.R. (1979). Economic analysis of electoral behavior: A critical review.Political Behavior 1: 137–143.
Google Scholar - Mueller, J.E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.American Political Science Review 64: 18–23.
Google Scholar - Nannestad, P. (1989).Reactive voting in Danish general elections 1971–79. Århus: Århus University Press.
Google Scholar - Nannestad, P. (1991).Danish design or British disease? Århus: Århus University Press.
Google Scholar - Nannestad, P. and M. Paldam (1993a). Mellem Samfundsøkonomi og egeninteresse: Samfundsøkonomi, privatøkonomi og mistillid til regeringens kompetence. Forthcoming in_Økonomi & Politik_. More comprehensive English version p.t. as working paper: Economic grievances and government support in a small welfare state: Micro theory and the Danish case.
- Nannestad, P. and M. Paldam (1993b). Sammenhængen mellem samfundsøkonomi, privatøkonomi, og tilslutningen til regeringspartierne. Forthcoming in_Politica_. More comprehensive English version p.t. as working paper: The egotropic welfare man: A micro study of Danish economic voting, 1985–92, using the Marcus Model.
- Nordhaus, W. (1975). The political business cycle.Review of Economic Studies 42: 169–190.
Google Scholar - Norpoth, H. (1987). Guns and butter and government popularity in Britain.American Political Science Review 81: 949–960. Also in Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
Google Scholar - Norpoth, H. and Yantek, T. (1983a). Macroeconomic conditions and fluctuations of presidential popularity: The question of lagged effects.American Journal of Political Science 27: 785–807.
Google Scholar - Norpoth, H. and Yantek, T. (1983b). Von Adenauer bis Schmidt: Wirtschaftslage und Kanzlerpopularität. In M. Kaase and H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.),Wahlen und Politisches System: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1980. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar - Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M. and Lafay, J.-D., (eds) (1991).Economics and politics: The calculus of support. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Google Scholar - Palda, K.F. and Palda, K.S. (1985). Ceilings on campaign spending: Hypothesis and partial tests with Canadian data.Public Choice 45: 313–331.
Google Scholar - Paldam, M. (1981). A preliminary survey of the theories and findings on vote and popularity functions.European Journal of Political Research 9: 181–199.
Google Scholar - Paldam, M. (1986). The distribution of election results and the two explanations of the cost of ruling.European Journal of Political Economy 2: 5–24.
Google Scholar - Paldam, M. (1987). Inflation and political instability in eight Latin American countries 1946–83.Public Choice 52: 143–168.
Google Scholar - Paldam, M. (1991). How robust is the vote function? A study of seventeen nations over four decades. In Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
- Paldam, M. and Schneider, F. (1980). The macroeconomic aspects of government and opposition popularity in Denmark, 1957–78.Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 118: 149–170.
Google Scholar - Panzer, J. and Paredes, R.D. (1991). The role of economic issues in elections: The case of the Chilean referendum.Public Choice 71: 51–59.
Google Scholar - Pissarides, C. (1980). British government popularity and economic performance.Economic Journal 90: 569–581.
Google Scholar - Powell, G.B.Jr., and Whitten G.D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. Forthcoming in the_American Journal of Political Science_.
- Rattinger, H. (1980).Wirtschaftliche Konjunktur und politische Wahlen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Dunker und Humblot.
Google Scholar - Rattinger, H. (1981). Unemployment and the 1976 election in Germany: Some findings at the aggregate and the individual level of analysis. In Hibbs and Fassbender (1981).
- Rattinger, H. (1991). Unemployment and elections in West Germany. In Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay, (1991).
- Remmer, K.L. (1991). The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.American Political Science Review 85: 777–799.
Google Scholar - Robertson, D. (1976). Surrogates for party identification in the rational choice framework. In I. Budge, I. Crewe and D. Farlie (Eds.),Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar - Rius, A. (1993) El gobierno, la economia y el hombre de la calle.SUMA 7–13: 7–35.
Google Scholar - Sanders, D., Ward, H., and March, D. (1987). Government popularity and the Falklands war: A reassessment.British Journal of Political Science 17: 281–313. Also in Norpoth, Lewis-Beck and Lafay (1991).
Google Scholar - Schneider, F. (1978).Politisch-ökonomische Modelle. Königstein: Hain.
Google Scholar - Schneider, F. (1984). Public attitudes toward economic conditions and their impact on government behavior.Political Behavior 6: 223–252. Also in Eulau and Lewis-Beck (1985).
Google Scholar - Schneider, F. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1980). Politico-economic interactions in Australia: Some empirical evidence.The Economic Record 56: 113–131.
Google Scholar - Schneider, F., Pommerehne, W.W. and Frey, B.S. (1981). Politico-economic interdependence in a direct democracy: The case of Switzerland. In Hibbs and Fassbender (1981).
- Schneider, F., and Naumann, J. (1982). Interest groups in democracies — how influential are they?Public Choice 38: 281–303. Also_Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik_ 1982/2: 167–183.
Google Scholar - Schram, A.J.H.C. (1989).Voter behavior in economic perspective. Alblasserdam: Offsetdrukkerij Kauters bv.
Google Scholar - Sen, A. (1986). Social choice theory. In K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical economics, Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Google Scholar - Stigler, G.J. (1973). General economic conditions and national elections.American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 63: 160–164.
Google Scholar - Suzuki, M. (1991). The rationality of economic voting and the macroeconomic regime.American Journal of Political Science 35: 624–642.
Google Scholar - Sørensen, R.J. (1987). Macroeconomic policy and government popularity in Norway 1963–86.Scandinavian Political Studies 10: 301–321.
Google Scholar - Whiteley, P., (Ed.) (1980).Models of political economy. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
Google Scholar - Whiteley, P. (1986). Macroeconomic performance and government popularity in Britain: The short run dynamics.European Journal of Political Research 14: 45–61.
Google Scholar - Zimmermann, E. and Saalfeld, T. (1988). Economic and political reactions to the world economic crisis of the 1930s in six European countries.International Studies Quarterly 32: 305–334.
Google Scholar