Aiming for the discursive high ground: Monsanto and the biotechnology controversy (original) (raw)
- Brill, Winston 1987 “Biotechnology and the environment.” Science, 5 June: 1159.
Google Scholar - Dickson, David andDavid Noble 1981 “By force of reason: The politics of science and technology policy.” In Thomas Ferguson and Joel Rogers (eds.), The Hidden Election: Politics and Economics in the 1980 Presidential Campaign: 260–312. New York: Pantheon Books.
Google Scholar - Doyle, Jack 1985 Altered Harvest: Agriculture, Genetics and the Fate of the World's Food Supply. New York: Viking.
Google Scholar - Elanco, Monsanto, andUpjohn 1989 “You've had BST and cookies all your life.” Newspaper advertisement in Agri-View, 5 October: 16.
Google Scholar - Enzensberger, Hans 1974 The Consciousness Industry. New York: Seabury.
Google Scholar - Ewen, Stuart 1976 Captains of Consciousness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar - Farrell, Kenneth R. 1987 “Communicating biotechnology.” California Agriculture 41:2.
Google Scholar - Fries, Sylvia Doughty 1983 “Expertise against politics: Technology as ideology on capitol hill, 1966–1972.” Science, Technology and Human Values 8:6–15.
Google Scholar - Gieryn, Thomas 1987 “Science and Coca-Cola.” Science and Technology Studies 5:12–21.
Google Scholar - Goldman, Robert 1987 “Marketing fragrances: advertising and the production of commodity signs.” Theory, Culture and Society 4:691–725.
Google Scholar - Gramsci, Antonio 1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Google Scholar - 1980 “Encoding/decoding.” In Stuart Hall_et al._ (eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79. London: Hutchinson and Co.
Google Scholar - 1982 “The rediscovery of ‘ideology’: Return of the repressed in media studies.” In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, and J. Woolacott (eds.), Culture, Society and the Media: 56–90. New York: Methuen.
Google Scholar - Klausner, Arthur 1986 “Monsanto: Betting a Giant on Biotechnology.” Bio/Technology 4: 403–411.
Google Scholar - 1986a “Social impact of biotech needs debate.” Wisconsin State Journal, 28 October: 10.
Google Scholar - 1986b “Ideological struggle and the biotechnology controversy.” Master's thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Google Scholar - Kleinman, Daniel Lee andSusan Pastor 1989 “BGH root issue is socioeconomic impact on small family farm.” Capital Times (Madison, WI), 7 September: 15.
Google Scholar - Kloppenburg, Jack R., Jr. 1988 First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar - Krimsky, Sheldon 1982 Genetic Alchemy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar - Mepham, John 1979 “The theory of ideology in_Capital._” In John Mepham and David-Hillel Ruben (eds.), Issues in Marxist Philosophy: 141–173. Hassocks, England: Harvester.
Google Scholar - Merton, Robert K. 1973 The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. New York: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar - Miliband, Ralph 1969 The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar - 1988a “Foam fast-food containers: The scapegoat, not the problem.” The New York Times, 5 May: 23.
Google Scholar - 1988b “Karl Marx, meet Adam Smith.” The New York Times, 2 June: 18.
Google Scholar - 1984 Genetic Engineering: A Natural Science (pamphlet). St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Corporation.
Google Scholar - Monsanto Corporation 1985a “Corn plant.” Television advertisement copy.
- Monsanto Corporation 1985b “Will it take a miracle to solve the world's hunger problems?” Newspaper advertisement copy.
- Monsanto Corporation 1985c “Imagine being allergic to the one drug that can save your life.” Newspaper advertisement copy.
- Monsanto Corporation 1986a Speech made in acceptance of the “Silver Anvil” award presented to Monsanto by the Public Relations Society of America, New York, NY June.
- 1986b Somatotropin—and the Dairy Surplus (pamphlet). St Louis, MO: Monsanto Corporation.
Google Scholar - Morely, David 1980 The “Nationwide” Audience. London: British Film Institute.
Google Scholar - Mouffe, Chantal 1979 “Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci.” In Chantal Mouffe (ed.), Gramsci and Marxist Theory: 168–204. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Google Scholar - Murrell, Rachel Kerys 1987 “Telling it like it isn't: Representations of science in tomorrow's world.” Theory, Culture and Society 4: 89–106.
Google Scholar - New Republic 1988 “What price mighty mouse.” 23 May: 7–10.
- 1979 “The chemistry of risk.” Seven Days, 5 July: 23–34.
Google Scholar - 1983 “Present tense technology: Part one.” Democracy 3: 8–24.
Google Scholar - Norman, Colin 1983 “Clerics urge ban on altering germline cells.” Science, 24 June: 1360–1361.
Google Scholar - 1951 The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar - 1962 “The republic of science” Minerva 1:54–73.
Google Scholar - Price, Harvey S. 1985 “Biotechnology: The need for public education.” BioScience 35:211.
Google Scholar - Richardson, F. 1985 “Trust me.” Agrichemical Age, 29 December: 44.
- Rogers, Karen 1985 Manager, Science Communications, Monsanto Corporation, Interview, December 3.
- Russell, Dick 1982 “The marketing of genetic science.” Amicus Journal 5:14.
Google Scholar - Schneider, Keith 1990 “Betting the farm on biotech.” New York Times Magazine, 10 June: 26–39.
Google Scholar - Sethi, S. Pralash 1977 Advocacy Advertising and Large Corporations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar - U.S. House of Representatives 1983 Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the Committee on Science and Technology, 98th Congress, 1st Session, 22 June. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar - Wernick, Andrew 1983 “Advertising and ideology: An interpretive framework.” Theory, Culture and Society 2:16–33.
Google Scholar - Williamson, Judith 1978 Decoding Advertisements. London: Marion Boyars.
Google Scholar