The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A prospective randomized study (original) (raw)

Abstract

A randomized prospective study was carried out to compare one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release with an open procedure. There were 47 patients (mean age 52.6 years): 25 underwent an endoscopic and 22 an open release. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risks against the benefits for pain, grip, key-pinch strength and ability to return to work. The distribution of age, occupation, sex, neurographic findings and operated hand was similar in both groups. We detected no serious nerve complications. One “open” patient developed a hypertrophic scar, a second “open” patient a disabling reflex sympathetic dystrophy, one “endo” patient a transient neurapraxia. The remaining patients experienced complete relief of symptoms. Improvement of grip strength is significantly better after endoscopic release (_P_=0.0001 at 3 months). In contrast, the key-pinch showed a similar pattern of improvement in both groups. The ability to use the operated hand as effectively as the contralateral one developed after 24 days for the endoscopic group versus 42 for the open approach (_P_=0.0000). The carpal arch alteration was less important for the endoscopic group (_P_= 0.013), but without any correlation with the grip strength. Agee's one-portal technique only allows correct placement of a knife, not an inspection of the structures being operated upon. This is a major limitation, reducing the surgeon to a technician. Further development of this procedure demands a device that will enable a fruitful inspection of the carpal tunnel.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agee JM, McCarroll HR, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA (1992) Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg [Am] 17:987–995
    Google Scholar
  2. Bande S, De Smet L, Fabry G (1994) The results of carpal tunnel release: open versus endoscopic technique. J Hand Surg [Br] 19:14–17
    Google Scholar
  3. Brown MG, Keyser B, Rothenberg ES (1992) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am] 17:1009–1011
    Google Scholar
  4. Chow JCY (1989) Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 5: 19–24
    PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Chow JCY (1993) The Chow technique of endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: four years of clinical results. Arthroscopy 9:301–314
    PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Cobb TK, Carmichael SW, Cooney WP (1994) The ulnar neurovascular bundle at the wrist. A technical note on endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Br] 19:24–26
    Google Scholar
  7. Erdmann MWH (1994) Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg [Br] 19:5–13
    Google Scholar
  8. Evans D (1994) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release — the hand doctor's dilemma. J Hand Surg [Br] 19:3–4
    Google Scholar
  9. Feinstein PA (1993) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in a community-based series. J Hand Surg [Am] 18:451–454
    Google Scholar
  10. Garcia-Elias M, Sanchez-Freijo JM, Lalo JM, Lluch AL (1992) Dynamic changes of the transverse carpal arch during flexionextension of the wrist: effects of sectioning the transverse carpal ligament. J Hand Surg 17A:1017–1019
    Google Scholar
  11. Gartsman G, Kovach J, Crouch C, Noble P, Bennett J (1986) Carpal arch alteration after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am] 11:372–374
    Google Scholar
  12. Kelly CP, Pulisetti D, Jamieson AM (1994) Early experience with endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Br] 19: 18–21
    Google Scholar
  13. Lanz U (1977) Anatomical variations of the medial nerve in the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg 2:44–53
    Google Scholar
  14. Rowland EB, Kleinert JM (1994) Endoscopic carpal-tunnel release in cadavera. An investigation of the results of twelve surgeons with this training model. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76: 266–268
    Google Scholar
  15. Schultz RJ, Endler PM, Huddleston HD (1973) Anomalous median nerve and anomalous muscle belly of the first lumbrical associated with carpal-tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joine Surg [Am] 55:1744–1746
    Google Scholar
  16. Seiler JG, Barnes K, Gelberman RH, Chalidong P (1992) Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an anatomic study of the two-incision method in human cadavers. J Hand Surg [Am] 17: 996–1002
    Google Scholar
  17. Sennwald G (1987) The wrist. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
    Google Scholar
  18. Spinner M (1978) Injuries to the major branches of peripheral nerves of the forearm. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 203–210
    Google Scholar
  19. Szabo RM, Pettey J (1994) Bilateral median nerve bifurcation with an accessory compartment within the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg [Br] 1:22–23
    Google Scholar
  20. Viegas SF, Pollard A, Kaminski K (1992) Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am] 17:1012–1016
    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgie St. Leonhard, Pestalozzistrasse 2, CH-9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland
    G. R. Sennwald & R. Benedetti

Authors

  1. G. R. Sennwald
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. R. Benedetti
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sennwald, G.R., Benedetti, R. The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A prospective randomized study.Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 3, 113–116 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01552386

Download citation

Key words