Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing (original) (raw)
References
Abney, S. P. (1989). A computational model of human parsing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 129–144. Google Scholar
Abney, S. P., & Johnson, M. (1991). Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 233–250. Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., & Lewis, C. H. (1977). A production system model of language processing. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365. Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1990).Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar
Baker, C. L. (1989).English syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Blank, G. D. (1989). A finite and real-time processor for natural language.Communications of the ACM, 32, 1174–1189. Google Scholar
Blauberg, M. S., & Braine, M. D. S. (1974). Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 745–748. Google Scholar
Blumenthal, A. L. (1966). Observations with self-embedded sentences.Psychonomic Science, 6, 453–454. Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test.Psychological Review, 97, 404–431. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.),A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986).Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Church, K. W. (1980).On memory limitations in natural language processing (Tech. Rep. MIT/LCL/TR-245). Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
Conrad, R. (1963). Acoustic confusions and memory span for words.Nature, 197, 1029–1030. Google Scholar
Cowper, E. A. (1976).Constraints on sentence complexity: A model for syntactic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. Google Scholar
De Roeck, A., Johnson, R., King, M., Rosner, M., Sampson, G., & Varile, N. (1982). A myth about center-embedding.Lingua, 58, 327–340. Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. (1970). Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory.Science, 168, 1604–1605. Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences.Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745. Google Scholar
Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 203–218. Google Scholar
Frank, R. E. (1992).Syntactic locality and tree adjoining grammar: Grammatical, acquisition and processing perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.Cognition, 6, 291–325. Google Scholar
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210. Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993).Working memory and language. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Gibson, E. A. (1991).A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon. (Available Tech. Rep. CMU-CMT-91-125, from Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213). Google Scholar
Gibson, E. A., & Pearlmutter, N. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on PP attachment. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner, (Eds.),Perspectives in sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Gibson, E. A., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzales, E., & Hickok, G. (1993).Crosslinguistic attachment preferences: Evidence from English and Spanish. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Gordon, R. (1982).The listener resolves an ambiguity. Unpublished paper for the Westinghouse science talent search.
Hakes, D. T., & Cairns, H. S. (1970). Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns.Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 5–8. Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese.Cognition, 9, 197–236. Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1994). Description based parsing in a connectionist network. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. (Available as Tech. Rep. IRCS-94-12 from The Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Walnut St., Suite 400C, Philadelphia, PA 19104). Google Scholar
Holmes, V. M., & O'Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 417–430. Google Scholar
Hudgins, J. C., & Cullinan, W. L. (1978). Effects of sentence structure on sentence elicited imitation responses.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 809–819. Google Scholar
Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai, (Eds.),Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. Google Scholar
Kac, M. B. (1981). Center-embedding revisited. In_Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society_ (pp. 123–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Kempen, G., & Vosse, T. (1989). Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing.Connection Science, 1, 273–290. Google Scholar
Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language.Cognition, 2, 15–47. Google Scholar
Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987). Soar: An architecture for general intelligence.Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1–64. Google Scholar
Larkin, W., & Burns, D. (1977). Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure.Memory & Cognition, 5, 17–22. Google Scholar
Lewis, R. L. (1993).An architecturally-based theory of human sentence comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. (Available as Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-93-226 from Computer Science Dept, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, or reports @ cs.cmu.edu.)
Lewis, R. L. (1995).A theory of grammatical but unacceptable embeddings. Submitted manuscript, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University.
Lewis, R. L., & Lehman, J. F. (1994).A theory of the computational architecture of sentence comprehension. Submitted manuscript, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University.
Logie, R. H., Zucco, G. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Interference with visual shortterm memory.Acta Psychologica, 75, 55–74. Google Scholar
Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Asplund, R., & Dyrnes, S. (1991). Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory.Vision Research, 31, 1213–1219. Google Scholar
Marcus, M. P. (1980).A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Marks, L. E. (1968). Scaling of gramrnaticalness of self-embedded English sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 965–967. Google Scholar
Martin, R. C. (1993). Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology.Memory & Cognition, 21, 176–183. Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., Kiritani, S., Niwa, S., Ikejira, K., & Naitoh, K. (1989). Processing of Japanese garden path, center-embedded, and multiply left-embedded sentences.Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (Tokyo), 23, 187–212. Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1988).The syntactic phenomena of English, volume 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
McGeoch, J. A., & McDonald, W. T. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition.American Journal of Psychology, 43, 579–588. Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.The Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar.American Psychologist, 17, 748–762. Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In D. R. Luce, R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (vol. II). New York: John Wiley. Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences.Information and Control, 7, 292–303. Google Scholar
Newell, A. (1990).Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Poizner, B. L., Bellugi, U., & Tweney, R. D. (1981). Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American Sign Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1146–1159. Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509–522. Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1982).Very short-term memory: In one eye and out the other. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis.
Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251–270. Google Scholar
Pritchett, B. L. (1992).Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Reich, P. (1969). The finiteness of natural language.Language, 45, 831–843. Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, P. S., Lehman, J. F., & Laird, J. E. (1993). Overview of Soar as a unified theory of cognition: Spring 1993. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 98–101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967).Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1973). Information persistence in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 39–49. Google Scholar
Shulman, H. G. (1970). Similarity effects in short-term memory.Psychological Bulletin, 75, 399–414. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk?Science, 183, 482–488. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., & Zhang, G. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and the acoustical loop hypotheses.Memory & Cognition, 13, 193–201. Google Scholar
Stabler, E. P. (1994).The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles. Google Scholar
Stevenson, S. (1994). Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 295–322. Google Scholar
Tambe, M., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1990). The problem of expensive chunks and its solution by restricting expressiveness.Machine Learning, 5, 299–348. Google Scholar
Walk, H. A., & Johns, E. E. (1984). Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors.Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 508–514. Google Scholar
Wang, M. D. (1970). The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 398–404. Google Scholar
Warner, J., & Glass, A. L. (1987). Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences.Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 714–738. Google Scholar
Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory.Psychological Review, 72, 89–104. Google Scholar
Whittemore, G., & Ferrara, K. (1990). Empirical study of predictive powers of simple attachment schemes for post-modifier prepositional phrases. In_Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics_ (pp. 23–30) Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar
Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 53–61. Google Scholar
Williams, H. L., Beaver, W. S., Spence, M. T., & Rundell, O. H. (1969). Digital and kinesmetic memory with interpolated information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 530–536. Google Scholar
Yngve, V. H. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure.Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104, 444–466. Google Scholar