The measurement of international scientific collaboration (original) (raw)
Notes and references
D. deB. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84. Google Scholar
T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen, Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration,Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17 (1992) 101–126. Google Scholar
D. deB. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 133–149. Google Scholar
E.g.G. Lewison, P. Cunningham, Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of transnational research,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 223–244; The EC SCIENCE/Stimulation Programme.Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 325–342. Google Scholar
J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo, Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, ”Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.
R. de Bruin, R. R. Braam, H. F. Moed, Bibliometric lines in the sand,Nature, 349 (1991) 559–562. Google Scholar
R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analyses of international scientific cooperation. An exploratory case study of the Netherlands. In:A. F. J. van Raan, A. J. Nederhof, H. F. Moed (Eds),Science and Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies, Leiden, DSWO Press, 1989, p. 129–145. Google Scholar
F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow, Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science. Vol 1. Commission of the European Communities (EUR 12900 EN), 1990.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10. Google Scholar
J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit. note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.
G. Lewison, P. Cunningham, Bibliometric studies for the evaluation of trans-national research,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 223–244. Google Scholar
H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, A. J. Nederhof, R. J. W. Tijssen International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European Community: Problems and perspectives,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 291–311. Google Scholar
F. Narin, K. Stevens, E. S. Whitlow Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers,Scientometrics, 21 (1991) 313–323. Google Scholar
T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2. Google Scholar
J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit., note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.
R. J. W. Tijssen, H. F. Moed,op. cit., note 7. Google Scholar
T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2. Google Scholar
F. Narin, E. S. Whitlow,op. cit., note 8 Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science. Vol 1. Commission of the European Communities (EUR 12900 EN), 1990.
Earth and space science, mathematics, physics, biomedicine, biology, chemistry, engineering and technology, clinical medicine.
Science and Technology Policy — Review and Outlook 1991. OECD: Paris 1992.
J.-F. Miquel, Y. Okubo,op. cit., note 5 Indicators to measure internationalization of science. A paper presented at a conference organised by the OECD, “Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators”, Paris, 2nd–5th July 1990.
T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit. note 2. Google Scholar
J. Anderson, P. M. D. Collins, J. Irvine, P. A. Isard, B. R. Martin, F. Narin, K. Stevens, Online approaches to measuring national scientific output: A cautionary tale,Science and Public Policy, 15 (1988) 153–161. Google Scholar
Our choice of the measures presented here has been guided by the following methodological and practical considerations: appropriateness, accessibility, and illustrative power.
G. Salton, D. Bergmark, A citation study of computer science literature,IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication PC-22, 3 (1979) 393–440. Google Scholar
P. H. A. Sneath, R. R. Sokal,Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973. Google Scholar
E.g.T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, G. Sivertsen,op. cit., note 2. Google Scholar
L. A. Goodman, The analysis of cross-classified data: independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries,Journal of American Statistical Association, 63 (1968) 1091–1131. Google Scholar
E.g.A. Schubert, T. Braun,op. cit., note 9.R. de Bruin, R. R. Braam, H. F. Moed,op. cit., note 6. Bibliometric lines in the sand,Nature, 349 (1991) 559–562. Google Scholar
R. J. W. Tijssen,Cartography of science: scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods, Leiden, DSWO Press, 1992. Google Scholar
I. Gómez, A. Méndez, Are peripheral countries profiting from scientific cooperation networks? In:P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, M. Winterhager (Eds),Representations of Science and Technology, Leiden, DWSO Press, 1992, 112–123. Google Scholar
R. J. W. Tijssen, J. De Leeuw, A. F. J. van Raan, Quasi-correspondence analysis on scientometric transaction matrices,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 351–366, describes an alternative method for doing a quasi-correspondence analysis through the application of a standard correspondence analysis to a pre-processed data matrix. Google Scholar