Structure of international collaboration in science: Typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator (original) (raw)

Notes and references

  1. D. de B. Beaver, R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration, Part 1. The professional origines of scientific co-authorship,Scientometrics, 1 (1978) 65–84.
    Google Scholar
  2. L. A. Lomnitz, M. W. Rees, L. Cameo, Publication and referencing patterns in a Mexican research institute,Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987) 115–133.
    Google Scholar
  3. L. Kerwin, International science — an overview,Science, 213 (1981) 1069–1072.
    Google Scholar
  4. Internationalisation of Science and Technology, In:Science and Technology Policy Outlook 1988, OECD, Paris, 1988 31–38.
  5. Science Indicators 1981, National Science Board, Washington D. C., 1981.
  6. J. D. Frame, M. Carpenter, International research collaboration,Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 481–497.
    Google Scholar
  7. J. F. Miquel, La coopération entre le Canada et la France en Science Fondamentale, In:Les enjeux économiques et politiques de l'innovation,M. Leclerc (Ed.), Presses de l'Université du Québec, Québec, 1990, pp. 201–222.
    Google Scholar
  8. J.W. Tijssen, H.F. Moed, Literature-based statistical analyses of international scientific cooperation — An exploratory case study of the Netherlands, In:Science and Technology Indicators,A.F.J. van Raan et al. (Ed.), DSWO Press, Leiden, 1988, pp. 131–145.
    Google Scholar
  9. A. Schubert, T. Braun, International collaboration in the sciences, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 3–10.
    Google Scholar
  10. J.C. Doré, J.F. Miquel, Approche de l'Etude des Relations Structure Activité par Analyse des Correspondances,C.R. Académie des Science, 293 (3) (1981) 1061–1064.
    Google Scholar
  11. E. Bignon, P. Pons, J.C. Doré, J. Gilbert, T. Ojasoo, J.F. Miquel, J.P. Raynaud, A. Crastes de Paulet, Influence of di- and tri-phenylethylene estrogen/antiestrogen structure on the mechanisms of protein kinase C inhibition and activation as revealed by a multivariate analysis,Biochemical Pharmacology, 42 (1991) 1373–1383.
    Google Scholar
  12. P.M. Carpenter, F. Narin, The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1981) 430–439.
    Google Scholar
  13. B. Martin, UK scientific performance,Scientometrics 20, (1991) 333–357.
    Google Scholar
  14. M. Carpenter, International Science Indicators-Development of indicators of international Scientific Activity using the Science Citation Index, Report submitted to National Science Foundation No. SRS77-22770 (1979).
  15. D. Frame, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean,Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143–148. See also, Science & Engineering Indicators 1989, National Science Foundation (1989), 331.
    Google Scholar
  16. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance —Some comments on Martin's “Reply”,Scientometrics, 20 (1990) 359–362.
    Google Scholar
  17. Science & Engineering Indicators 1989, National Science Foundation (1989), 335. See also Ref. 8.
  18. A.F.J. van Raan, R.J.W. Tijssen, An overview of quantitative science and technology indicators based on bibliometric methods,Consequences of the Technology Economy Programme for the Development of Indicators, OECD, 1990.
  19. J.P. Benzécri,L'analyse des données, II. L'analyse des correspondances, Dunod, Paris, 1973.
    Google Scholar
  20. C. Chatfield, A. J. Collins, Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. In:Introduction to Multivariate Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London, 1989 p. 189.
    Google Scholar
  21. R.C. Prim, Shortest connection networks and some generalizations,Bell System Technology Journal, 36 (1957) 1389.
    Google Scholar
  22. J. C. Gower, G.J.S. Ross, Minimum spanning trees and single link cluster analysis,Applied Statistics, 18 (1969) 54–64.
    Google Scholar
  23. J. Devillers, J.C. Doré, Heuristic potency of the minimum spanning tree (MST) method in toxicology,Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety, 17 (1989) 227.
    Google Scholar
  24. L.L. Lederman, Science and technology policies and priorities: A comparative analysis,Science, 237 (1987) 1125–1133.
    Google Scholar
  25. T. Braun, I. Gomez, A. Mendez, A. Schubert, International co-authorship patterns in physics and its subfields, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 181–200.
    Google Scholar
  26. G. Ekspong, Contribution to discussion on big science,Nobel Symposium, KVA, 1988.
  27. R. MacLeod, Organizing science under the Southern cross, In:The Commonwealth of Science,R. Macleod (Ed.), Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1988, p. 19–39. See also pp. 40–72. AndI.D. Rae, Chemists at ANZAAS: Cabbages or Kings? pp. 166–195 in the same collection.
    Google Scholar
  28. J. El Alami, J.C. Doré, J.F. Miquel, International scientific collaboration in Arab countries,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 249–263.
    Google Scholar
  29. Excellence in the midst of poverty,Nature, 12 April (1984).
  30. Y. Okubo, J.F. Miquel, International Scientific Collaboration of Japan: Co-authorship Analysis,Journal of Science Policy and Research Management 6 (4), 1992, 1–16.
    Google Scholar
  31. Data based on 1986 version of CD-ROM of the_Science Citation Index_.
  32. The number of international co-authorships (COA) used in this article is supplied by CHI Research Inc.
  33. This Figure is based on the following calculation. Affinity Index for a Country A toward a Country B:Number of Co-operative Linkages between a country A and a country B×100 Number of Co-operative Linkages between a country A and the rest of the world For Affinity Index see:Y. Okubo, J.F. Miquel, International collaboration in basic science, In:Indikatoren der Wissenschaft und Technik-Theorie, Methoden, Anwendungen,P. Weingart et al. (Ed.), Campus, Forschung (1991) 49–71. See also: Research Output, In:Science Indicators 1991 Compendium,J. Gagné (Ed.), Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Science, Québec, 1991, p. 39–49. In these articles we present matrices of different dimensions.
  34. J.J. Salomon, Science, technology and society, In:New Technologies and Development, A. Johnston, A. Sasson (Eds.), UNESCO, Paris, 1986, p. 13–41.
    Google Scholar

Download references