Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific stroop interference (original) (raw)

Abstract

Adult, male smokers were randomly assigned to be nicotine abstinent for 12 h (_n_=10) or to smoke normally for the same period of time (_n_=10). Performance on a modified version of the Stroop (1935) color-naming task, where subjects named the color of ink in which each of a series of words was written, showed that abstinent smokers took significantly longer to color-name words related to cigarette smoking (e.g., Lighter) than to color-name neutral control words (e.g., Pennant). Non-abstinent smokers showed a significant difference in the opposite direction. These results suggest that nicotine abstinence decreases the ability to ignore the meaning of smoking-related information. This finding supports the hypothesis that abstinence produces a content-specific shift in attentional focus. The present pattern of results cannot be explained by a general decrease in cognitive function due to nicotine abstinence.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, 90024, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Todd M. Gross
  2. West Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Wadsworth and Brentwood Division, Wilshire and Sawtelle Boulevards, 90073, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Murray E. Jarvik & Martin R. Rosenblatt

Authors

  1. Todd M. Gross
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Murray E. Jarvik
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Martin R. Rosenblatt
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, T.M., Jarvik, M.E. & Rosenblatt, M.R. Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific stroop interference.Psychopharmacology 110, 333–336 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251289

Download citation

Key words