The importance of intraspecific frequency-dependent selection in modelling competitive coevolution (original) (raw)

Summary

The coevolution of competitors has been analyzed by two different types of fitness-maximization techniques; ESS methods (Lawlor and Maynard Smith, 1976), and CSS methods (Roughgarden, 1979). This paper argues that CSS methods generally do not predict the outcome of competitive coevolution. Even when there is relatively little variability within species, fitness maximization leads to an ESS rather than a CSS. A simple model is analyzed to show that ESS and CSS predictions about character displacement can differ qualitatively. Previous results of CSS analyses are discussed.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology & Behavioral Biology, University of Minnesota, 318 Church St, 55455, SE Minneapolis, MN, USA
    Peter A. Abrams

Authors

  1. Peter A. Abrams
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abrams, P.A. The importance of intraspecific frequency-dependent selection in modelling competitive coevolution.Evol Ecol 3, 215–220 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270722

Download citation

Keywords