Structure and feeding activities of zooplankton community in Lake Zwemlust, in the two years after biomanipulation (original) (raw)
References
BENNDORF, J., 1988. Objectives and unsolved problems in ecotechnology and biomanipulation: a preface. Limnologica, 19:5–8. Google Scholar
BENEKEN-KOLMER, C.M., 1987. Species composition and grazing pressure of the zooplankton in the recreation pool ‘Zwemlust’. Report 1987-18, Limnological Institute, Nieuwersluis (in Dutch). Google Scholar
EJSMONT-KARABIN, J., R.D. GULATI and J. ROOTH. Is food availability the main factor controlling_Euchlanis dilatata lucksiana_ Hauer abundance in a shallow, hypertrophic lake? Hydrobiologia (in press).
GRIMM, M.P., 1989. Northern pike (Esox lucius L.) and aquatic vegetation, tools in the management of fisheries and water quality in shallow waters. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 59–65. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., 1978. The ecology of common planktonic crustacea of the freshwaters in The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia, 59: 101–112. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., 1983. Zooplankton and its grazing as indicators of trophic status in Dutch lakes. Env. Monit. Assessm., 3: 343–354. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., 1985a. Zooplankton structure and grazing activities in relation to food quality and concentration in Dutch lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol., Beih. Ergebn. Limnol., 21: 91–102. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., 1985b. Zooplankton grazing methods using radioactive tracers: technical problems. Hydrobiol. Bull., 19: 61–69. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., 1989. Concept of stress and recovery in aquatic ecosystems. In: O. Ravera, Ed., ‘Ecological assessment of environmental degradation, pollution and recovery’, Proceedings of a course held at Joint Research Centre, Ispra (Italy), 12–16 October, 1987. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 81–119. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D. Zooplankton structure in Loosdrecht lakes in relation to trophic status and the recent restoration measures. In: ‘Trophic relationships in inland waters’. Proceedings Congress, Tihany, Hungary (September, 1987). Developments in Hydrobiology (in press).
GULATI, R.D. and E. VAN DONK, 1989. Biomanipulation in The Netherlands: applications in freshwater ecosystems and estuarine waters—an introduction. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 1–4. Google Scholar
GULATI, R.D., K. SIEWERTSEN and G. POSTEMA, 1982. The zooplankton, its community structure, food and feeding, and role in the ecosystem of Lake Vechten. Hydrobiologia, 95: 127–164. Google Scholar
HALL, D.J., S.T. THRELKELD, C.W. BURNS and P.H. CROWLEY, 1976. The size-efficiency hypothesis and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 7: 177–208. Google Scholar
HOLTBY, L.B. and R. KNOECHEL, 1981. Zooplankton filtering rates: error due to loss of radioisotopic label in chemically preserved samples. Limnol. Oceanogr., 26: 774–780. Google Scholar
HOSPER, S.H., 1989. Biomanipulation, new perspective for restoring shallow, eutrophic lakes in The Netherlands. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 5–10. Google Scholar
HOSPER, S.H. and M.-L. MEIJER, 1986. Control of phosphorus loading and flushing as restoration methods for Lake Veluwe, The Netherlands. Hydrobiol. Bull., 20: 183–194. Google Scholar
HUTCHINSON, G.E., 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. II. Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley.
KOTT, P., 1953. Modified whirling apparatus for subsampling of plankton. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res., 4: 387–397. Google Scholar
LAMMENS, E.H.R.R., 1989. Causes and consequences of the success of bream in Dutch, eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 11–18. Google Scholar
LAMPERT, W., 1978. Climatic conditions and planktonic interaction as factors controlling the regular succession of spring algal bloom and extremely clear water in Lake Constance. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 20: 969–974. Google Scholar
LAMPERT, W., 1984. The measurements of respiration. In: J.A. Downing and F.H. Rigler, Eds., ‘A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary production in fresh water’, IBP Handbook No. 17, 2nd edn., Oxford, p. 413–468.
LAMPERT, W., 1988. The relationship between zooplankton biomass and grazing: a review. Limnologica (Berlin), 19: 11–20. Google Scholar
LAMPERT, W., W. FLECKNER, H. RAI and B.E. TAYLOR, 1986. Phytoplankton control by grazing zooplankton: a study on the clear-water phase. Limnol. Oceanogr., 31: 478–490. Google Scholar
McCAULEY, E. and J. KALFF, 1981. Empirical relationship between phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38: 458–462. Google Scholar
MEIJER, M.-L., A.J.P. RAAT and R.W. DOEF, 1989. Restoration by biomanipulation of the Dutch shallow, eutrophic Lake Bleiswijkse Zoom: first results. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 49–57. Google Scholar
NAUWERCK, A., A. DUNCAN, A. HILLBRICHT-ILLKOWSKA and P. LARSSON, 1980. Zooplankton. In: E.D. Le Cren and R.H. Lowe McConnell, Eds., ‘The functioning of freshwater ecosystems’ I.B.P. No. 22, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 85–140. Google Scholar
PERSSON, G. and G. EKBOHM, 1980. Estimation of dry weight in zooplankton populations: methods applied to crustacean populations from lakes in the Kuokkal Area, Northern Sweden. Arch. Hydrobiol., 89: 225–246. Google Scholar
RAAT, A.J.P., 1989. Growth and production of 0+ bream (Abramis brama), roach (Rutilus rutilus) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) in ten drainable 0.1 ha ponds. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 67–72. Google Scholar
RICHTER, A.F., 1986. Biomanipulation and its feasibility for water quality management in shallow, eutrophic water bodies in The Netherlands. Hydrobiol. Bull., 20: 165–172. Google Scholar
RICHTER, A.F., G.J. SCHROTENBOER, J. VIJVERBERG and S. VISSER, 1987. Experiments in enclosures on the biological control of water quality. Report 1987-2 Limnological Institute-DBW/RIZA (in Dutch).
SCHEFFER, M., 1989. Alternative stable states in eutrophic, shallow freshwater systems: a minimal model. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23:73–83. Google Scholar
SLIM, F.J., 1988. Application of biological control measures in a hypertrophic lake to improve its water quality. Report 1988-18, Limnological Institute, Nieuwersluis (in Dutch, with English summary). Google Scholar
SOMMER, U., 1984. Light, stratification and zooplankton as controlling factors for the spring development of phytoplankton in Lake Constance. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol., 45: 394–404. Google Scholar
SOMMER, U., Z.M. GLIWICZ and W. LAMPERT, 1985. The PEG model of seasonal succession of plankton in fresh waters. Arch. Hydrobiol., 106: 433–471. Google Scholar
VAN DONK, E., R.D. GULATI and M.P. GRIMM, 1989a. Restoration by biomanipulation in a small hypertrophic lake: first-year results. In: ‘Trophic relationships in inland waters’, Proceedings Congress Tihany, Hungary (September, 1987). Developments in Hydrobiology (in press).
VAN DONK, E., R.D. GULATI and M.P. GRIMM, 1989b. Food-web manipulation in Lake Zwemlust: positive and negative effects during the first two years. Hydrobiol. Bull., 23: 19–34. Google Scholar
VAN LIERE, L., 1986. Loosdrecht Lakes, origin, eutrophication, restoration and research programme. Hydrobiol. Bull., 20: 9–15. Google Scholar
VAN LIERE, L., L. VAN BALLEGOOYEN, W.A. DE KLOET, K. SIEWERTSEN, P. KOUWENHOVEN and T. ALDENBERG, 1986. Primary production in various parts of the Loosdrecht Lakes. Hydrobiol. Bull., 20: 77–85. Google Scholar
WINBERG, G.G. and collaborators, 1971. Symbols, units and conversion factors of freshwater productivity. IBP, London, 23 pp. Google Scholar