An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms (original) (raw)
Reference Notes
Dudewicz, E. J.IRCCRAND-The Ohio State University random number generator package (Tech. Rep. No. 104). Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, Department of Statistics, 1974. Google Scholar
Learmonth, G. P., & Lewis, P. A. W.Naval Postgraduate School random number generator package LLRANDOM (Tech. Rep. NP S55LW73061A). Monterey, Calif.: Naval Postgraduate School, Department of Operations Research and Administrative Sciences, 1973. Google Scholar
References
Anderberg, M. R.Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Google Scholar
Baker, F. B. Stability of two hierarchical grouping techniques Case I: Sensitivity to data errors.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974,69, 440–445. Google Scholar
Bartko, J. J., Straus, J. S., & Carpenter, W. T. An evaluation of taxometric techniques for psychiatric data.Classification Society Bulletin, 1971,2, 2–28. Google Scholar
Blashfield, R. K. Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods.Psychological Bulletin, 1976,83, 377–388. Google Scholar
Bromley, D. B. Rank order cluster analysis.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966,19, 105–123. Google Scholar
Cattel, R. B.rp and other coefficients of pattern similarity.Psychometrika, 1949,14, 279–298. Google Scholar
Cormack, R. M. A review of classification.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 1971,134, 321–367. Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. Assessing the similarity between profiles.Psychological Bulletin, 1953,50, 456–473. Google Scholar
Cunningham, K. M., & Ogilvie, J. C. Evaluation of hierarchical grouping techniques: A preliminary study.Computer Journal, 1972,15, 209–213. Google Scholar
D'Andrade, R. G._U_-statistic hierarchical clustering.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 59–67. Google Scholar
Dudewicz, E. J. Speed and quality of random numbers for simulation.Journal of Quality Technology, 1976,8, 171–178. Google Scholar
Edelbrock, C. Comparing the accuracy of hierarchical clustering algorithms: The problem of classifying everybody.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1979,14, 367–384. Google Scholar
Everitt, B. S.Cluster analysis. London: Halstead Press, 1974. Google Scholar
Fleiss, L., & Zubin, J. On the methods and theory of clustering.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1969,4, 235–250. Google Scholar
Friedman, H. P., & Rubin, J. On some invariant criteria for grouping data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1967,62, 1159–1178. Google Scholar
Hartigan, J. A.Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley, 1975. Google Scholar
Helmstadter, G. An empirical comparison of methods for estimating profile similarity.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1957,17, 71–82. Google Scholar
Hubert, L. J., & Levin, J. R. Evaluating object set partitions: Free sort analysis and some generalizations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 459–470. Google Scholar
Jardine, N., & Sibson, R.Mathematical taxonomy. New York: Wiley, 1971. Google Scholar
Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 241–254. Google Scholar
Kuiper, F. K., & Fisher, L. A Monte Carlo comparison of six clustering procedures.Biometrics, 1975,31, 777–783. Google Scholar
Levinsohn, J. R., & Funk, S. G. CLUSTER-Hierarchical clustering program for large data sets (N greater than 100).Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1973,5, 432. Google Scholar
Mezich, J. E. An evaluation of quantitative taxonomic methods (Doctral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1975).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975,36, 3008-B. (University Microfilms No. 75-26, 616).
Milligan, G. W. An examination of the effect of error perturbation of constructed data on fifteen clustering algorithms (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1978).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979,40, 4010B-4011B. (University Microfilms No. 7902188). Google Scholar
Milligan, G. W. Ultrametric hierarchical clustering algorithms.Psychometrika, 1979,44, 343–346. Google Scholar
Milligan, G. W., & Isaac, P. D. The validation of four ultrametric clustering algorithms.Pattern Recognition, 1980,12, 41–50. Google Scholar
Peay, E. R. Nonmetric grouping: Clusters and cliques.Psychometrika, 1975,40, 297–313. Google Scholar
Rand, W. M. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1971,66, 846–850. Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. Methods of comparing classifications.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1974,5, 101–113. Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects.Psychometrika, 1974,39, 373–421. Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. A comparison of different clustering methods as applied to randomly-spaced points.Classification Society Bulletin, 1966,1, 2–18. Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A. Evaluation of clustering methods. In A. J. Cole (Ed.),Numerical taxonomy, New York: Academic Press, 1969. Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R.Numerical taxonomy, San Francisco: Freeman, 1973. Google Scholar
Williams, W. T., Lance, G. N., Dale, M. B., & Clifford, H. T. Controversy concerning the criteria for taxonometric strategies.Computer Journal, 1971,14, 162–165. Google Scholar
Zahn, C. T. Graph theory methods for detecting and describing Gestalt clusters.IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1971,C-20, 68–86. Google Scholar