Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women (original) (raw)

Summary

Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2–L4) and hip (at femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and greater trochanter sites) were determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA), and of the radius by single-photon absorptiometry (SPA) in healthy postmenopausal women aged 40–70 years. The relationships of BMC and BMD to years since menopause were examined separately in 97 women who were above 115% of ideal body weight (IBW) and in 128 women below. The heavier women had significantly greater mean BMC and BMD at each site than did the normal-weight women. In the normal-weight women, there was a significant negative correlation between BMD and years since menopause at each measurement site except the greater trochanter. In the obese women, BMD decreased with increasing years since menopause at the radius site only and BMC declined with increasing years after menopause at the hip (femoral neck and Ward's triangle region) as well as the radius. Thus, body size is a significant determinant of BMD in this population. The pattern of loss of BMD from Ward's triangle and femoral neck regions of hip are similar to that of the spine. The BMC and BMD findings in the hip suggest that remodeling occurs at this weight-bearing site which has a favorable effect on bone strength.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniell HW (1976) Osteoporosis of the slender smoker. Arch Intern Med 136:298–304
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  2. Seeman E, Melton LJ, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1983) Risk factors for spinal osteoporosis in men. Am J Med 75:977–983
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  3. Yano K, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM, Heibrun LK (1984) Bone mineral measurements among middle-aged and elderly Japanese residents in Hawaii. Am J Epidemol 119:751–764
    CAS Google Scholar
  4. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn KL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ (1981) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndrome. J Clin Invest 70:716–723
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Aubrey BJ, Jacobsen PC, Grubb SA, McCartney WH, Vincent LM, Talmage RV (1984) Bone density in women: a modified procedure for measurement of distal radial density. J Orthop Res 2:314–321
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Russell RM, McGandy R, Jelliffe D (1984) Reference weights: practical considerations. Am J Med 76:767–769
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  7. Peppler WW, Mazess RB (1981) Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry I. Theory and measurement procedure. Calcif Tissue Int 33:353–359
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  8. Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Towsley M, Lindsay R, Markhard L, Dempster D (1985) Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone. Radiol 156:203–206
    CAS Google Scholar
  9. Gotfredsen A, Borg J, Christiansen C, Mazess RB (1984) Total body bone mineral in vivo by dual photon absorptiometry II. Accuracy. Clin Physiol 4:357–362
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  10. Dunn WL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1980) Measurement of bone mineral content in human vertebrae and hip by dual photon absorptiometry. Radiology 136:485–487
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  11. Hanson JA, Mazess RB, Barden H (1986) Influence of source activity on dual-photon scans. J Bone Miner Res 1:281 [abstract]
    Google Scholar
  12. Cameron JR, Sorenson J (1963) Measurement of bone mineral in vivo: an improved method. Science 142:230–232
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  13. Nilas L, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C (1986) Total and local bone mass before and after normalization for indices of bone and body size. Scan J Lab Invest 46:53–57
    CAS Google Scholar
  14. Nordin BEC, Young MM, Bentley B, Ormondroyd P, Sykes J (1968) Lumbar spine densitometry methodology and results in relation to the menopause. Clin Radiol 19:459–464
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  15. Krolner B (1982) Osteoporosis and normality: how to express the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Clin Physiol 2:139–146
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  16. Kley HK, Deselaers, Peerenboom H, Kruskempen HL (1980) Enhanced conversion of androstenedione to estrogens in obese males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:1128–1132
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  17. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, 02111, Boston, Massachusetts
    Bess Dawson-Hughes M.D., Clanton Shipp, Laura Sadowski & Gerard Dallal

Authors

  1. Bess Dawson-Hughes M.D.
  2. Clanton Shipp
  3. Laura Sadowski
  4. Gerard Dallal

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawson-Hughes, B., Shipp, C., Sadowski, L. et al. Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women.Calcif Tissue Int 40, 310–314 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556691

Download citation

Key words