Lumbar spine films in primary care (original) (raw)

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) often prompts radiography, although the diagnostic yield of lumbar spine films is low, and many radiographic abnormalities are unrelated to symptoms. Criteria have been proposed for selective x-ray use, but their value and safety are uncertain. To evaluate these criteria, the authors prospectively studied 621 walk-in patients with LBP. The yield of explanatory x-ray findings was over three times greater among patients with indications for radiography than among those without. Furthermore, an indication for x-rays existed for all patients found to have a malignancy, and for 13 of 14 patients with an identified fracture. Actual physician ordering, however, did not correspond well with the recommended indications. Application of selective criteria appears safe and may improve the yield of useful findings. It may not, however, reduce x-ray utilization from current levels without further refinement in the criteria.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cypress BK: Office visits to internists: the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States, 1975. Vital and Health Statistics: Series 13. Data from the National Health Survey: no. 36. DHEW Publication (PHS) 79–1787, 1978
  2. Cypress BK: Characteristics of physician visits for back symptoms: a national perspective. Am J Public Health 1983;73:389–395
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  3. Levine DB: The painful low back. In: McCarty DJ, ed. Arthritis and allied conditions. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1979:1044–79
    Google Scholar
  4. Hinton RC: Backache. In: Samuels MA, ed. Manual of neurologic therapeutics with essentials of diagnosis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1982:71–82.
    Google Scholar
  5. Nachemson AL: The lumbar spine: an orthopedic challenge. Spine 1976;1:59–71
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Rockey PH, Tompkins RK, Wood RW, Wolcott BW: The usefulness of x-ray examinations in the evaluation of patients with back pain. J Fam Pract 1978;7:455–65
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  7. Liang M, Komaroff AL: Roentgenograms in primary care patients with acute low back pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:1108–12
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  8. Greenfield S, Anderson H, Winickoff RN, et al: Nurse-protocol management of low back pain. West J Med 1975;123:350–9
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  9. Koch H, Gagnon RO: Office visits involving x-rays, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: United States, 1977. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics, 1979: DHEW publication no. (PHS) 79–1250. (Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics No. 53.)
    Google Scholar
  10. Hall FM. Overutilization of radiological examinations. Radiology 1976;120:443–8
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  11. Hall FM: Back pain and the radiologist. Radiology 1980;137:861–3
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  12. MacNab I. Backache. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1977:131
    Google Scholar
  13. Fries JF, Mitchell DM. Joint pain or arthritis. JAMA 1976;235:199–204
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  14. Reilly BM: Low back pain. In: Reilly BM: Practical strategies in outpatient medicine. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1984:1–70
    Google Scholar
  15. Morris JL: Radiologic evaluation. In: Carron H, McLaughlin RE, eds. Management of low back pain. Boston: John Wright/PSG Inc., 1982:107–147
    Google Scholar
  16. Calin A, Porta J, Fries JF, Schurman DJ: Clinical history as a screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 1977;237:2613–14
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  17. Dillane JB, Fry J, Kalton G: Acute back syndrome—a study from general practice. Br Med J 1966;3:82–4
    Google Scholar
  18. Aiken BM, Cohen BS: The role of congenital anomalies in low back pain. Md State Med J 1983(Jan):38–41
  19. Gamse RR, Sinaki M, Ilstrup DM: Lumbar spondylolisthesis: a rational approach to conservative treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 1980;55:681–6
    Google Scholar
  20. White AA, Panjabi MM: Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. 1978:283
    Google Scholar
  21. Deyo RA, McNiesh LM, Cone RO: Observer variability in the interpretation of lumbar spine radiographs. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:1066–70
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  22. Scavone JG, Latshaw RF, Rohrer GV: Use of lumbar spine films: statistical evaluation at a university teaching hospital. JAMA 1981;246:1105–8
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, 78284, San Antonio, TX
    Richard A. Deyo MD, MPH

Authors

  1. Richard A. Deyo MD, MPH
  2. Andrew K. Diehl MD, MSc

Additional information

Received from the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deyo, R.A., Diehl, A.K. Lumbar spine films in primary care.J Gen Intern Med 1, 20–25 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596320

Download citation

Key words