Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps (original) (raw)

Abstract

The movement toward democratic political systems in many nations in the 1980s has renewed interest in measurement of political democracy. This paper calls attention to the problems that surround both the definition and measurement of political democracy. The main conceptual problems are the failure to develop an adequate theoretical definition of this concept, the confounding of the concept with others, and treating democracy as a binary rather than a continuous concept. Four problems of measurement are: invalid indicators, subjective indicators, ordinal or dichotomous measures, and the failure to test reliability or validity. The paper offers several suggestions to improve measurement as well as a warning about the danger of repeating past errors.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, C.B. #3210 Hamilton, 27599-3210, Chapel Hill, N.C.
    Kenneth A. Bollen

Corresponding author

Correspondence toKenneth A. Bollen.

Additional information

Kenneth A. Bollen is a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. His major research interests are in international development and statistics. He is the author of_Structural Equations with Latent Variables_ (1989), published in John Wiley's Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bollen, K.A. Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps.St Comp Int Dev 25, 7–24 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02716903

Download citation

Keywords