On the evaluation of structural equation models (original) (raw)

• Akaike, H. 1974. “A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19:716–723.
  Article Google Scholar
• Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing 1984. “The Effect of Sampling Error on Convergence, Improper Solutions, and Goodness-of-fit Indices for Maximum Likelihood Confirmatory Factor Analysis,”Psychometrika 49:155–173.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, Richard P. 1977. “Structural Equation Models in Experimental Research,”Journal of Marketing Research 14:209–226.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1980. Causal Models in Marketing. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• — 1981. “An Examination of the Validity of Two Models of Attitude.”Multivariate Behavioral Research 16:323–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1982. “A Field Investigation of Causal Relations Among Cognitions, Affect, Intentions, and Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research 19:562–584.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1983. “A Holistic Methodology for Modeling Consumer Response to Innovation,”Operations Research 31:128–176.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1984. “A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 48:11–29.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1986. “Attitude Formation Under the Theory of Reasoned Action and a Purposeful Behavior Reformulation.”British Journal of Social Psychology 25:95–107.
  Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, Richard P. Joham Baumgartner, and Youjae Yi 1988. “An Investigation into the Role of Volitions as Intervening Variables in the Atitude-Behavior Relationship.” Unpublished working paper, The University of Michigan.
• —, and Robert E. Burnkrant 1979. “Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37:913–929.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, Richard P., and Paul R. Warshaw 1988. “From Unintended to Goal-type Behavior and Outcomes: A Theory of Human Action.” Unpublished working paper, The University of Michigan.
• — and Robert E. Burnkrant 1985. “Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: A Reply to Dillon and Kumar.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49:47–57.
  Article Google Scholar
• Balderjahn, Ingo 1985. “A Comment on Bagozzi and Burnkrant’s and Dillon and Kumar’s Controversy about Attitude Organization.” Unpublished working paper, Institute for Quantitative Methods, Technical University of Berlin.
• Balderjahn, Ingo 1986. “Cross-validation of Covariance Structures in One and Multi Group Analysis: The Case of the Ecologically Concerned Consumers.” Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the German Classification Society, June 18–21.
• Bearden, W. O., S. Sharma, and J. E. Teel 1982. “Sample Size Effects on Chi square and Other Statistics Used in Evaluating Causal Models.”Journal of Marketing Research 19:425–430.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bentler, Peter M. 1980. “Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal Modeling.”Annual Review of Psychology 31:419–456.
  Article Google Scholar
• — 1985.Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equations Program, Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
  Google Scholar
• — and Douglas G. Bonett 1980. “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in Analysis of Covariance Structures.”Psychological Bulletin 88:588–606.
  Article Google Scholar
• Boomsma, Anne 1985. “Noncovergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in LISREL Maximum Likelihood Estimation.”Psychometrika 50:229–242.
  Article Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. 1982. “Covariance Structures.” In_Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis_. Ed. D. M. Hawkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–141.
  Google Scholar
• Cliff, Norman 1983. “Some Cautions Concerning the Application of Causal Modeling Methods.”Multivariate Behavioral Research 18:115–126.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cole, David A. and Scott E. Maxwell 1985. “Multitrait-Multimethod Comparisons Across Populations: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach.”Multivariate Behavioral Research 20:389–417.
  Article Google Scholar
• Costner, H. L. and R. Schoenberg 1973. “Diagnosing Indicator, Ills in Multiple Indicator Models.” In_Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences_. Eds. A. S. Goldberger and O. D. Duncan. New York: Seminar Press, 167–199.
  Google Scholar
• Cudeck, Robert and Michael W. Browne 1983. “Cross-validation of Covariance Structures.”Multivariate Behavioral Research 18:147–167.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dillon, William R. and S. Kumar 1985. “Attitude Organization and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: A Critique of Bagozzi and Burnkrant’s Reanalysis of Fishbein and Ajzen.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49:33–46.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen 1974. “Attitudes Toward Objects as Predictors of Single and Multiple Behavioral Criteria.”Psychological Review 81:59–74.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error”.Journal of Marketing Research 18:39–50.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fornell, Claes, and Roland T. Rust 1986. “Incorporating Prior Theory in Covariance Structure Analysis: A Bayesian Approach.” Unpublished working paper, The University of Michigan.
• Herzberg, P. A. 1969. “The Parameters of Cross-validation”.Psychometrika, 34: Monograph Supplement 16
• Hoelter, Jon W. 1983. “The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-fit Indices.Sociological Methods & Research 11:325–344.
  Article Google Scholar
• Joreskog, Karl G. 1971. “Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations.”Psychometrika 36:409–426.
  Article Google Scholar
• —, and Dag Sorbom 1984.LISREL: Analysis of Linear Structure Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
  Google Scholar
• — 1986.PRELIS: A Program for Multivariate Data Screening and Data Summarization. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
  Google Scholar
• Mosier, C. I. 1951. “Problems and Designs of Cross-validation.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 11:5–11.
  Article Google Scholar
• Oliver, Richard L. and William O. Bearden 1985. “Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: A Moderating Influence Attempt.”Journal of Consumer Research 12:324–340.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, David 1983. “Parameterizing Inequality Constraints on Unique Variances in Linear Structural Models.”Psychometrika 48:73–83.
  Article Google Scholar
• Saris, Willem, E. and Henk Stronkhorst 1984. Causal Modelling in Nonexperimental Research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.
  Google Scholar
• Satorra, A. and William E. Saris 1985. “The Power of the Likelihood Ratio Test ion Covariance Structure Analysis.”Psychometrika 50:83–90.
  Article Google Scholar
• Schwartz, G. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.,”Annals of Statistics 6:461–464.
  Google Scholar
• Shimp, Terence A. and Alican Kavas 1984. “The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage.,”Journal of Consumer Research 11:795–809.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sobel, Michael E. and George W. Bohrstedt 1985. “Use of Null Models in Evaluating the fit of Covariance Structure Models.” In_Sociological Methodology_ 1985. Ed. N. B. Tuma. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 152–178.
  Google Scholar
• Sorbom, Dag 1974. “A General Method for Studying Differences in Factor Means and Factor Structure Between Groups.”British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology 27:229–239.
  Google Scholar
• — 1978. “An Alternative to the Methodology for Analysis of Covariance.”Psychometrika 43:381–396.
  Article Google Scholar
• Steiger, James H., Alexander Shapiro, and Michael W. Browne 1985. “On the Multivariate Asymptotic Distribution of Sequential Chi-square Statistics.”Psychometrika 50:253–264.
  Article Google Scholar
• van Driel, O. P. 1978. “On various Causes of Improper Solutions of Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.”Psychometrika 43:225–243.
  Article Google Scholar