Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger (original) (raw)

Abstract

We evaluated two prototype instruments that measure pulsatile blood pressure continuously and noninvasively and compared the mean arterial pressure obtained from these devices with that obtained mvasivcly m 17 male surgical patients. Each prototype consisted of an infrared photoplethysmograph mounted inside a finger cuff. The cuff was connected to a pressure control valve, which rapidly changed the cuff pressure so as to maintain a null pressure difference across the finger arterial wall. The resultant cuff pressure rapidly tracked the pulsatile intraarterial pressure. The prototypes reproduced absolute pressure, as well as pressure changes, accurately and linearly over a wide range of mean arterial pressures (from 2 to 164 mm Hg), with an average offset error of 0.8 mm Hg (SD ± 3.8; range, -4.6 to 7.9), a mean scatter error of 5.3 mm Hg (range, 3.6 to 8.6), a mean regression slope of 0.97 (range, 0.79 to 1.22) and a mean correlation coefficient of the regression of 0.96 (range, 0.89 to 0.98).

Both prototypes worked satisfactorily on all 17 patients, but not all the time on all patients. In 7 patients, probable arterial spasm prevented measurement of finger blood pressure 12.1% of the time, or 5.4% of the time for all patients. Ninety-six percent of the lost samples occurred with prototype 2, suggesting an instrument-related cause, rather than one related to the principle itself.

The prototypes were simple to use and were almost free from artifact. Continuous monitoring for up to 7 hours on a single finger caused no harm to the finger.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marey EJ: Pression et vitesse du sang. In: Masson G, ed. Physiologique experimentale, vol 2. Paris, 1876
  2. Geddes LA: The direct and indirect measurement of blood pressure. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1970:196
    Google Scholar
  3. Shirer HW: Blood pressure measuring methods. IRE Trans Biomed Eng 1962; 9:116–125
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Penaz J, Voigt A, Teichmann W: Beitrag zur fortlaufenden indirekten Blutdruckmessung. Zschr Inn Med 1976; 31:1030–1033
    CAS Google Scholar
  5. Penaz J: Photoelectric measurement of blood pressure, volume and flow in the finger. Digest 10th Int Conf Med Biol Eng 1973; 104
  6. Yamakoshi K, Shimazu H, Togawa T: Indirect measurement of instantaneous arterial blood pressure m the rat. Am J Physiol 1979; 237:H632-H637
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  7. Yamakoshi K, Shimazu H, Togawa T: Indirect measurement of instantaneous arterial blood pressure in the human finger by the vascular unloading technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980; 27:150–155
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  8. Yamakoshi K, Kamiya A, Shimazu H, et al: Noninvasivc automatic monitoring of instantaneous arterial blood pressure using the vascular unloading technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 1983; 21:557–565
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  9. Ramsey M III: Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979; 17:1–18
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Yelderman M, Ream AK: Indirect measurement of mean blood pressure in the anesthetized patient. Anesthesiology 1979; 50:253–256
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  11. Snedecor GW: Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press, 1956
    Google Scholar
  12. Van Bergen FH, Weatherhead OS, Treloar AE, et al: Comparison of indirect and direct methods ot measuring arterial blood pressure. Circulation 1954; 10:481–490
    Google Scholar
  13. London SB, London RE: Comparison ot indirect pressure measurements (Korotkotf) with simultaneous direct brachial artery pressure distal to the cuff. Adv Intern Med 1967; 13:127–142
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  14. Reder RF, Dimich I, Cohen ML. Steinfeld L: Evaluating indirect blood pressure measurement techniques: a comparison of three systems in infants and children. Pediatrics 1978; 62:326–330
    PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  15. Bruner JMR, Krenis LJ. Kunsman JM, Sherman AP: Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring arterial blood pressure, part I. Med Iustrum 1981; 15:11–21
    CAS Google Scholar
  16. Bruner JMR, Krenis LJ, Kunsman JM, Sherman AP: Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring arterial blood pressure, part II. Med Iustrum 1981; 15:97–101
    CAS Google Scholar
  17. Bruner JMR, Krenis LJ, Kunsman JM, Sherman AP: Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring arterial blood pressure, part III. Med Iustrum 1981; 14:182–188
    Google Scholar
  18. Wesseling KH, de Wit B, Settels JJ, Klawer WH: On the indirect registration of finger blood pressure after Peñaz. Funkt Biol Med 1982; 1:245–250
    Google Scholar
  19. Molhoek PG, Wesseling KH, Arntzenius AC, et al: Initial results ot non-invasive measurement ot finger blood pressure according to Peñaz. Automedica 1983; 4:241–246
    Google Scholar
  20. Stern DH, Gerson JI, Allen FB, Parker FB: Can we trust the direct radial artery pressure immediately following cardiopulmonary bypass? Abstract. Anesthesiology 1982; 57:A174
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Karel H. Wesseling PhD & Benjamin de Wit BS
    Present address: Research Unit, Biomédical Instrumentation BM1-TNO, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, Holland

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthcsiology, University of California, San Diego
    N. Ty Smith MD
  2. Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, CA
    N. Ty Smith MD
  3. Division for Technical Scientific Services TNO, Cardiovascular Physics Group, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Karel H. Wesseling PhD & Benjamin de Wit BS

Authors

  1. N. Ty Smith MD
  2. Karel H. Wesseling PhD
  3. Benjamin de Wit BS

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, N.T., Wesseling, K.H. & de Wit, B. Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger.J Clin Monitor Comput 1, 17–29 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832685

Download citation

Key words