Statistical tests as inappropriate tools for data analysis performed on non-random samples of plant communities (original) (raw)
Abstract
Many authors apply statistical tests to sets of relevés obtained using non-random methods to investigate phytosociological and ecological relationships. Frequently applied tests include the_t_-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test (of independence, goodness-of-fit, and homogeneity), Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, concentration analysis, tests of linear correlation and Spearman rank correlation coefficient, computer intensive methods (such as randomization and re-sampling) and others. I examined the extent of reliability of the results of such tests applied to non-random data by examining the tests requirements according to statistical theory. I conclude that when used for such data, the statistical tests do not provide reliable support for the inferences made because non-randomness of samples violated the demand for observations to be independent, and different parts of the investigated communities did not have equal chance to be represented in the sample. Additional requirements, e.g. of normality and homoscedasticity, were also neglected in several cases. The importance of data satisfying the basic requirements set by statistical tests is stressed.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Bishop Y.M.M., Fienberg S.E. &Holland P.W. (1975):Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, Cambridge. [Reference for electronic appendix]
Google Scholar - Botta-Dukát Z. &Ruprecht E. (2000): Using concentration analysis for operating with indicator values: effect of grouping species.Acta Bot. Hung. 42: 55–363.
Google Scholar - Chytrý M., Tichý L. &Roleček J. (2003): Local and regional patterns of species richness in Central European vegetation types along the pH/calcium gradient.Folia Geobot. 38: 429–442.
Article Google Scholar - Dierschke H. (1994):Pflanzensoziologie. Grundlagen und Methoden. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar - Ellenberg H, Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W. &Paulißen D. (1991): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa.Scripta Geobot. 18: 1–248.
Google Scholar - Ewald J. (2003): The calcareous riddle: why are there so many calciphilous species in the Central European Flora?Folia Geobot. 38: 357–366.
Article Google Scholar - Gibbons J.D. (1971):Nonparametric statistical inference. McGraw-Hill Company, New York.
Google Scholar - Hájek M, Hekera P. &Hájková P. (2002): Spring fen vegetation and water chemistry in the Western Carpathian flysch zone.Folia Geobot. 37: 205–224.
Article Google Scholar - Henry G.H.R. (1998): Environmental influences on the structures of sedge meadows in the Canadian High Arctic.Pl. Ecol. 134: 119–129.
Article Google Scholar - Hoaglin D.C., Mosteller F. &Tukey J.W. (1983):Understanding robust and explanatory data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Google Scholar - Hoaglin D.C., Mosteller F. &Tukey J.W. (1985):Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar - Johnson J.B. (1997): Stand structure and vegetation dynamics of a subalpine treed fen in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado.J. Veg. Sci. 8: 337–342.
Article Google Scholar - Kendall M. &Stuart A. (1977):The advanced theory of statistics 1: Distribution theory. Griffin & Company Ltd., London. [Reference for electronic appendix]
Google Scholar - Kendall M. &Stuart A. (1979):The advanced theory of statistics 2: Inference and relationship. Griffin & Company Ltd., London. [Reference for electronic appendix]
Google Scholar - Kenkel N.C., Juhász-Nagy P. &Podani J. (1989): On sampling procedures in population and community ecology.Vegetatio 83: 195–207.
Article Google Scholar - Kreeb K.H. (1983):Vegetationskunde. Methoden und Vegetationsformen unter Berücksichtigung ökosystemischer Aspekte. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar - Kruskal W. (1988): Miracles and statistics: the casual assumption of independence.J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83: 929–940.
Article Google Scholar - Lájer K. (2000): Self-organising structure in tussock patterns.Acta Bot. Hung. 42: 211–224.
Google Scholar - Lájer K. (2001):Magyarország lápi vegetációjának növénytársulástani vizsgálata (A phytocenological treatise on the Hungarian mire vegetation). PhD. Thesis, University of Pécs, Pécs.
- Lájer K. (2002): Florisztikai és cönológiai vizsgálatok a somogyi Dráva-völgy rétjein (Floristic and cenological studies on meadows of the Somogy county valley of river Drava).Kitaibelia 7: 187–205.
Google Scholar - Lawesson J.E. (2003): pH optima for Danish forest species compared with Ellenberg reaction values.Folia Geobot. 38: 403–418.
Article Google Scholar - Lele S.R. &Richtsmeier J.T. (2001):Statistical analysis of shapes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
Google Scholar - Lepš J. &Hadincová V. (1992): How reliable are our vegetation analyses?J. Veg. Sci. 3:119–124.
Article Google Scholar - Lundekvam H.E. &Gauslaa Y. (1986): Phytosociology and ecology of mowed grasslands in Western Norway.Meld. fra norges landbrukshogskole 65(22): 1–26.
Google Scholar - Machol R.E. (1975): The Titanic coincidence.Interfaces 5: 53–54.
Article Google Scholar - Matus G. &Tóthmérész B. (1990): The effect of grazing on the structure of a sandy grassland. In:Krahulec F., Agnew S. &Willems J.H (eds.),Spatial processes in plant communities, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp. 23–30.
Google Scholar - Ohlson M., Økland R.H., Nordbakken J-F. &Dahlberg B. (2001): Fatal interactions between Scots pine and_Sphagnum_ mosses in bog ecosystems.Oikos 94: 425–432.
Article Google Scholar - Økland R.H. &Bendiksen E. (1985): The vegetation of the forest-alpine transition in the Grunningsdalen area, Telemark, SE Norway.Sommerfeltia 2: 1–224.
Google Scholar - Orlóci L. &Kenkel N.C. (1985):Introduction to data analysis with examples from population and community ecology. International Co-operative Publishing House Failand, Maryland.
Google Scholar - Rédei T., Botta-Dukát Z., Csiky J., Kun A. &Tóth T. (2003): On the possible role of local effects on the species richness of acidic and calcareous rock grasslands in Northern Hungary.Folia Geobot. 38: 453–467.
Article Google Scholar - Rényi A. (1977):Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung mit einem Anhang über Informationstheorie. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin. [Reference for electronic appendix]
Google Scholar - Ripley B.D. (1981):Spatial statistics. Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar - Ruprecht E. &Botta-Dukát Z. (2000): Long-term vegetation textural changes of three fen communities near Cluj-Napoca (Romania).Acta Bot. Hung. 42: 265–284.
Google Scholar - Schaffers A.P. &Sýkora K.V. (2000): Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements.J. Veg. Sci. 11: 225–244.
Article Google Scholar - Schuster B. &Diekmann M. (2003): Changes in species density along the soil pH gradient — evidence from German plant communities.Folia Geobot. 38: 367–379.
Article Google Scholar - Sekuler R. &Blake R. (1994):Perception. Ed. 3. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.
Google Scholar - Sokal R.R. &Rohlf F.J. (1981):Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Ed. 2. Freeman and Company, New York.
Google Scholar - Staudte R.G. &Sheather S.J. (1990):Robust estimation and testing. Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar - Wołek J. (1997): Species co-occurrence patterns in pleustonic plant communities (class_Lemnetea_). Are there assembly rules governing pleustonic community assembly?Fragm. Florist. Geobot. Suppl. 5: 3–100.
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Environmental Technology, Eötvös József College, Technical Faculty, Bajcsy-Zs. u. 14, H-6500, Baja, Hungary
Konrád Lájer
Corresponding author
Correspondence toKonrád Lájer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lájer, K. Statistical tests as inappropriate tools for data analysis performed on non-random samples of plant communities.Folia Geobot 42, 115–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893878
- Received: 22 March 2004
- Revised: 13 August 2005
- Accepted: 04 January 2006
- Issue date: June 2007
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02893878