LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K _*_0 μ + μ −, JHEP08 (2013) 131 [arXiv:1304.6325] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B 0 → K _*_0 μ + μ −, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 191801 [arXiv:1308.1707] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality using B + → K + ℓ + ℓ − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 151601 [arXiv:1406.6482] [INSPIRE].
D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett.B 136 (1984) 183 [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett.B 145 (1984) 216 [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
M.J. Dugan, H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Anatomy of a composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 254 (1985) 299 [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys.B 365 (1991) 259 [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, RKand future b → sℓℓ physics beyond the Standard Model opportunities, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 054014 [arXiv:1408.1627] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, SU(2) × U(1) gauge invariance and the shape of new physics in rare B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 241802 [arXiv:1407.7044] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On B → Vℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections and new physics, JHEP05 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1212.2263] [INSPIRE]. Article Google Scholar
F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth and D. van Dyk, Comprehensive Bayesian analysis of rare (semi)leptonic and radiative B decays, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2897 [Erratum ibid.C 74 (2014) 3179] [arXiv:1310.2478] [INSPIRE].
J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy — the charm of QCD or new physics in b → sℓ + ℓ − ?,arXiv:1406.0566 [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of B → K * μ + μ − observables, JHEP12 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1407.8526] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, State of new physics in b → s transitions, arXiv:1411.3161 [INSPIRE].
S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B → K*ℓ + ℓ − decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, arXiv:1412.3183 [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Understanding the B → K*μ + μ − anomaly, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 074002 [arXiv:1307.5683] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Calculation of B 0 → K _*_0 μ + μ − and B 0 s → ϕμ + μ − observables using form factors from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 212003 [arXiv:1310.3887] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
A. Datta, M. Duraisamy and D. Ghosh, Explaining the B → K*μ + μ − data with scalar interactions, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 071501 [arXiv:1310.1937] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
R. Gauld, F. Goertz and U. Haisch, On minimal Z ′ explanations of the B → K*μ + μ − anomaly, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015005 [arXiv:1308.1959] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in Lμ-Lτmodels, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 095033 [arXiv:1403.1269] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of \( \overline{B}\to K\overline{\ell}\ell \) decays, JHEP12 (2007) 040 [arXiv:0709.4174] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
S. Davidson, D.C. Bailey and B.A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes, Z. Phys.C 61 (1994) 613 [hep-ph/9309310] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
S. Biswas, D. Chowdhury, S. Han and S.J. Lee, Explaining the lepton non-universality at the LHCb and CMS within a unified framework, JHEP02 (2015) 142 [arXiv:1409.0882] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
S. Davidson, G. Isidori and S. Uhlig, Solving the flavour problem with hierarchical fermion wave functions, Phys. Lett.B 663 (2008) 73 [arXiv:0711.3376] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
Z.-Z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Updated values of running quark and lepton masses, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 113016 [arXiv:0712.1419] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
B. Gripaios, T. Müller, M.A. Parker and D. Sutherland, Search strategies for top partners in composite Higgs models, JHEP08 (2014) 171 [arXiv:1406.5957] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 055014 [hep-ph/0612048] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Olive et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys.C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE]. Google Scholar
I. Phillips et al., Neutron-antineutron oscillations: theoretical status and experimental prospects, submitted to Phys. Rept. (2014) [arXiv:1410.1100] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff and D.M. Straub, \( B\to {K}^{\left(\ast \right)}\nu \overline{\nu} \) decays in the Standard Model and beyond, JHEP02 (2015) 184 [arXiv:1409.4557] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADSMathSciNet Google Scholar
T. Hurth, G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik and F. Mescia, Constraints on new physics in MFV models: a model-independent analysis of Δ_F_ = 1 processes, Nucl. Phys.B 808 (2009) 326 [arXiv:0807.5039] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADSMATH Google Scholar
F. Newson et al., Prospects for \( {K}^{+}\to {\pi}^{+}\nu \overline{\nu} \) _at CERN in NA_62, arXiv:1411.0109 [INSPIRE].
A. Lenz and U. Nierste, Numerical updates of lifetimes and mixing parameters of B mesons, arXiv:1102.4274 [INSPIRE].
J.P. Saha, B. Misra and A. Kundu, Constraining scalar leptoquarks from the K and B sectors, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 095011 [arXiv:1003.1384] [INSPIRE]. ADS Google Scholar
MEG collaboration, J. Adam et al., New constraint on the existence of the μ + → e + γ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 201801 [arXiv:1303.0754] [INSPIRE]. Article Google Scholar
BaBar collaboration, K. Flood, New results in radiative electroweak penguin decays at BaBar, PoS(ICHEP 2010)234 [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Measurement of the branching fraction of B + → τ + ντdecays with the semileptonic tagging method and the full Belle data sample, arXiv:1409.5269 [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., _Final report of the muon E_821 anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE]. Google Scholar
D. Chakraverty, D. Choudhury and A. Datta, A nonsupersymmetric resolution of the anomalous muon magnetic moment, Phys. Lett.B 506 (2001) 103 [hep-ph/0102180] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar
CMS collaboration, Search for pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks and top squarks in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, Phys. Lett.B 739 (2014) 229 [arXiv:1408.0806] [INSPIRE]. Google Scholar
CMS collaboration, Search for third generation scalar leptoquarks decaying to top quark-tau lepton pairs in pp collisions, CMS-PAS-EXO-13-010, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
ATLAS collaboration, Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1407.0583] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D.M. Straub and A. Tesi, A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests, JHEP05 (2013) 069 [arXiv:1211.5085] [INSPIRE]. ArticleADS Google Scholar