An explicit construction of the dimension-9 operator basis in the standard model effective field theory (original) (raw)

References

  1. S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  2. L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise, The Effective Hamiltonian for Nucleon Decay, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2208 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  3. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  4. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MATH Google Scholar
  5. L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  6. Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Renormalization Group Evolution of Dimension-seven Baryon- and Lepton-number-violating Operators, JHEP 11 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1607.07309] [INSPIRE].
    MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  7. E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Algebraic Structure of Lepton and Quark Flavor Invariants and CP-violation, JHEP 10 (2009) 094 [arXiv:0907.4763] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  8. A. Hanany, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and G. Torri, Hilbert Series for Flavor Invariants of the Standard Model, JHEP 03 (2011) 096 [arXiv:1010.3161] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  9. L. Lehman and A. Martin, Hilbert Series for Constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist’s toolbox, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105014 [arXiv:1503.07537] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  10. L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  11. B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . .: Higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
  12. B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions, JHEP 10 (2017) 199 [arXiv:1706.08520] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  13. B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, DEFT: A program for operators in EFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 128 [arXiv:1807.07546] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  14. J.C. Criado, BasisGen: automatic generation of operator bases, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 256 [arXiv:1901.03501] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  15. R.M. Fonseca, Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035040 [arXiv:1907.12584] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  16. C.B. Marinissen, R. Rahn and W.J. Waalewijn, . . ., 83106786, 114382724, 1509048322, 2343463290, 27410087742, . . . efficient Hilbert series for effective theories, Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135632 [arXiv:2004.09521] [INSPIRE].
  17. U. Banerjee, J. Chakrabortty, S. Prakash and S.U. Rahaman, Characters and group invariant polynomials of (super)fields: road to “Lagrangian”, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 938 [arXiv:2004.12830] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  18. H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete Set of Dimension-8 Operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2005.00008 [INSPIRE].
  19. C.W. Murphy, Dimension-8 operators in the Standard Model Eective Field Theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 174 [arXiv:2005.00059] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  20. A. Aparici, K. Kim, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Right-handed neutrino magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 013010 [arXiv:0904.3244] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  21. F. del Aguila, S. Bar-Shalom, A. Soni and J. Wudka, Heavy Majorana Neutrinos in the Effective Lagrangian Description: Application to Hadron Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2009) 399 [arXiv:0806.0876] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  22. S. Bhattacharya and J. Wudka, Dimension-seven operators in the standard model with right handed neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055022 [Erratum ibid. 95 (2017) 039904] [arXiv:1505.05264] [INSPIRE].
  23. Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Operators up to Dimension Seven in Standard Model Effective Field Theory Extended with Sterile Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015012 [arXiv:1612.04527] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  24. K.S. Babu and C.N. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 667 [hep-ph/0106054] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  25. A. de Gouvêa and J. Jenkins, A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013008 [arXiv:0708.1344] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  26. M.L. Graesser, An electroweak basis for neutrinoless double β decay, JHEP 08 (2017) 099 [arXiv:1606.04549] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  27. M. Gustafsson, J.M. No and M.A. Rivera, Lepton number violating operators with standard model gauge fields: A survey of neutrino masses from 3-loops and their link to dark matter, JHEP 11 (2020) 070 [arXiv:2006.13564] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  28. S. Rao and R.E. Shrock, Six Fermion (B − L) Violating Operators of Arbitrary Generational Structure, Nucl. Phys. B 232 (1984) 143 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  29. W.E. Caswell, J. Milutinovic and G. Senjanović, Matter-antimatter transition operators: a manual for modeling, Phys. Lett. B 122 (1983) 373 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  30. E. Rinaldi, S. Syritsyn, M.L. Wagman, M.I. Buchoff, C. Schroeder and J. Wasem, Neutron-antineutron oscillations from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 162001 [arXiv:1809.00246] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  31. S. Weinberg, Varieties of Baryon and Lepton Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1694 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  32. H.A. Weldon and A. Zee, Operator Analysis of New Physics, Nucl. Phys. B 173 (1980) 269 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  33. T. Hambye and J. Heeck, Proton decay into charged leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 171801 [arXiv:1712.04871] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  34. Y. Liao and J.-Y. Liu, Generalized Fierz Identities and Applications to Spin-3/2 Particles, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127 (2012) 121 [arXiv:1206.5141] [INSPIRE].
    Google Scholar
  35. A. Kobach, Baryon Number, Lepton Number, and Operator Dimension in the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 455 [arXiv:1604.05726] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MATH Google Scholar
  36. Y. Liao, Unique Neutrino Mass Operator at any Mass Dimension, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2011) 346 [arXiv:1009.1692] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  37. Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Perturbative Power Counting, Lowest-Index Operators and Their Renormalization in Standard Model Effective Field Theory, Commun. Theor. Phys. 69 (2018) 285 [arXiv:1701.08019] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  38. Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma and Q.-Y. Wang, Extending low energy effective field theory with a complete set of dimension-7 operators, JHEP 08 (2020) 162 [arXiv:2005.08013] [INSPIRE].
    ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  39. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean and G. Valencia, Evading the Grossman-Nir bound with ∆I = 3_/_2 new physics, JHEP 08 (2020) 034 [arXiv:2005.02942] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  40. H. Pas, M. Hirsch, H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and S.G. Kovalenko, A Superformula for neutrinoless double beta decay. 2. The Short range part, Phys. Lett. B 498 (2001) 35 [hep-ph/0008182] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  41. G. Prezeau, M. Ramsey-Musolf and P. Vogel, Neutrinoless double beta decay and effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 034016 [hep-ph/0303205] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  42. Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma and H.-L. Wang, Effective field theory approach to lepton number violating decays K ± _→ π_∓ l ± l ± : short-distance contribution, JHEP 01 (2020) 127 [arXiv:1909.06272] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  43. V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M.L. Graesser and E. Mereghetti, A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory, JHEP 12 (2018) 097 [arXiv:1806.02780] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  44. T. Geib, A. Merle and K. Zuber, μ − − e+ conversion in upcoming LFV experiments, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 157 [arXiv:1609.09088] [INSPIRE].
  45. T. Geib and A. Merle, μ − − e+ Conversion from Short-Range Operators, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 055009 [arXiv:1612.00452] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  46. J.M. Berryman, A. de Gouvêa, K.J. Kelly and A. Kobach, Lepton-number-violating searches for muon to positron conversion, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 115010 [arXiv:1611.00032] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  47. Mu2e collaboration, The Mu2e Experiment, Front. Phys. 7 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1901.11099] [INSPIRE].
  48. Frejus collaboration, Lifetime limits on (B − L) violating nucleon decay and dinucleon decay modes from the Frejus experiment, Phys. Lett. B 269 (1991) 227 [INSPIRE].
  49. C. McGrew et al., Search for nucleon decay using the IMB-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 052004 [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  50. Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Dinucleon and Nucleon Decay to Two-Body Final States with no Hadrons in Super-Kamiokande, arXiv:1811.12430 [INSPIRE].
  51. J. Heeck and V. Takhistov, Inclusive Nucleon Decay Searches as a Frontier of Baryon Number Violation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 015005 [arXiv:1910.07647] [INSPIRE].
    ADS Google Scholar
  52. Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Search for Nucleon and Dinucleon Decays with an Invisible Particle and a Charged Lepton in the Final State at the Super-Kamiokande Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 121803 [arXiv:1508.05530] [INSPIRE].
  53. H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete Set of Dimension-9 Operators in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2007.07899 [INSPIRE].

Download references