A framework for model transformation verification (original) (raw)

References

  1. Ab Rahim L, Whittle J (2010) Verifying semantic conformance of state machine-to-Java code generators, MODELS 2010, LNCS
  2. Anastasakis K, Bordbar B, Kuster J (2007) Analysis of model transformations via alloy, Modevva
  3. Anastasakis K, Bordbar B, Georg G, Ray I (2010) On challenges of model transformation from UML to alloy. Softw Syst Model 9(1):69–86
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Asztalos M, Ekler P, Lengyel L, Levendovszky T, Mezei G, Meszaros T (2010) Automated verification by declarative description of graph rewriting-based model transformations. In: MPM 2010. EASST, vol 42
  5. Becker B, Beyer D, Giese H, Klein F, Schilling D (2006) Symbolic invariant verification for systems with dynamic structural adaptation. In: ICSE 2006, ACM Press
  6. Becker B, Lambers L, Dyck J, Birth S, Giese H (2011) Iterative development of consistency-preserving rule-based refactorings. In: ICMT 2011, LNCS, vol 6707
  7. Bezivin J, Buttner F, Gogolla M, Jouault F, Kurtev I, Lindow A (2006) Model transformations? Transformation models!. ATLAS group, University of Nantes
    Google Scholar
  8. Boronat A, Heckel R, Meseguer J (2009) Rewriting logic semantics and verification of model transformations. FASE 2009. pp 18–33
  9. Brucker A, Wolff B (2006) The HOL-OCL book. Technical report 525. ETH Zurich
  10. Brucker A, Krieger M, Wolff B (2010) Extending OCL with null-references. MODELS 2009 Workshops, LNCS 6002. pp 261–275
  11. Buttner F, Cabot J, Gogolla M (2011) On validation of ATL transformation rules by transformation models. Modevva 2011
  12. Buttner F, Egea M, Cabot J, Gogolla M (2012) Verification of ATL transformations using transformation models and model finders. ICFEM 2012
  13. Cabot J, Clariso R, Guerra E, De Lara J (2010) Verification and validation of declarative model-to-model transformations through invariants. J Syst Softw 83(2):283–302
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Cabot J, Clariso R, Riera D (2007) UMLtoCSP: a tool for the verification of UML/OCL models using constraint programming. In: Automated Software Engineering ’07. pp. 547–548, ACM Press
  15. Calegari D, Luna C, Szasz N, Tasistro L (2011) A type-theoretic framework for certified model transformations. In: FM 2011. LNCS, vol 6527. pp 112–127
  16. Drey Z, Faucher C, Fleurey F, Mahe V, Vojtisek D (2009) Kermeta language reference manual.https://www.kermeta.org/docs/KerMeta-Manual.pdf, April
  17. Eclipsepedia, ATL user guide. http://wiki.eclipse.org/ATL/User_Guide_-_The_ATL_Language, 2014.
  18. Ehrig H, Ehrig K, Ermel C, Hermann F, Taentzer G (2007) Information preserving bidirectional model transformations. In: FASE 2007. pp 72–86
  19. Event-B and Rodin platform. http://www.event-b.org, 2014
  20. FAA (2012) DO-178C, Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification
  21. Giese H, Glesner S, Leitner J, Shafer W, Wagner R (2006) Towards verified model transformations. In: Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on model-driven engineering, verification and validation (Modevva)
  22. Goguen J, Burstall R (1992) Institutions: abstract model theory for specification and programming. J ACM 39:95–146
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  23. Guerra E, de Lara J, Kolovos DS, Paige RF, Marchi dos Satos O (2010) transML: a family of languages to model model transformations. In: MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol 6394. Springer, Berlin, pp 106–120
  24. Hermann F, Ehrig H, Orejas F, Czarnecki K, Diskin Z, Xiong Y (2011) Correctness of model synchronisation based on Triple Graph Grammars. In: MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol 6981. Springer, Berlin, pp 748–752
  25. Inaba K, Hidaka S, Hu Z, Kato H, Nakano K (2011) Graph-transformation verification using monadic second-order logic. In: PDPP ’11
  26. Jouault F, Kurtev I (2006) Transforming models with ATL. In: MoDELS 2005. LNCS, vol 3844. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–138
  27. Jakumeit E, Buchwald S, Kroll M (2010) GrGen.NET: the expressive, convenient and fast graph rewrite system. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 12:263–271
    Google Scholar
  28. Kolahdouz-Rahimi S, Lano K, Pillay S, Troya J, Van Gorp P (2014) Evaluation of model transformation approaches for model refactoring. Sci Comput Progr 85:5–40
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Kolovos DS, Paige RF, Polack F (2008) The epsilon transformation language. In: ICMT. pp 46–60
  30. Kuhlmann M, Gogolla M (2012) From UML and OCL to relational logic and back. In: MODELS 2012. LNCS, vol 7590. Springer, Berlin, pp 415–431
  31. Kuster J (2006) Definition and validation of model transformations. SoSyM 5(3):233–259
    Google Scholar
  32. Lano K (1996) The B language and method, Springer, Berlin
  33. Lano K (2006) Using B to verify UML transformations, Modevva 06
  34. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S (2010) Migration case study using UML-RSDS. TTC 2010, Malaga, Spain, July
  35. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S (2011) Slicing techniques for UML models. J Object Technol 10
  36. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S, Poernomo I (2012) Comparative evaluation of model transformation specification approaches. Int J Softw Inf 6(2):233–269
    Google Scholar
  37. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S, Clark T (2012) Comparing verification techniques for model transformations. Modevva workshop, MODELS
  38. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S (2011) Model-driven development of model transformations. In: ICMT 2011. LNCS, vol 6707. pp 47–61
  39. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S (2013) Constraint-based specification of model transformations. J Syst Softw 88(2):412–436
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Lano K, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S, Clark T (2012) Verification of model transformations. Dept. of Informatics, King’s College London
  41. Lano K (2014) Null considered harmful (for transformation verification). VOLT 2014, STAF conference, York
  42. Massoni T, Gheyi R, Borba P (2005) Formal refactoring for UML class diagrams. In: 19th Brazilian symposium on Software Engineering
  43. Mossakowski T, Maeder C, Luttich K (2012) The heterogeneous tool set. University of Bremen, Germany
  44. Narayanan A, Karsai G (2006) Towards verifying model transformations. In: GT-VMT 2006. ENTCS, vol 211. pp 191–200
  45. Narayanan A, Karsai G (2008) Verifying model transformations by structural correspondence. In: GT-VMT. EASST, vol 10
  46. OMG (2011) QVT specification, Version 1.1.
  47. OMG (2012) Object constraint language v2.3.1 specification, formal/2012-01-02
  48. Poernomo I (2008) Proofs as model transformations. In: ICMT
  49. Poernomo I, Terrell J (2010) Correct-by-construction Model Transformations from Spanning tree specifications in Coq. In: ICFEM
  50. Rensink A, Schmidt A, Varro D (2004) Model checking graph transformations: a comparison of two approaches. In: ICGT 2004. LNCS, vol 3256
  51. Soeken M, Wille R, Drechsler R (2012) Encoding OCL data types for SAT-based verification of UML/OCL models. University of Bremen
  52. Stenzel K, Moebius N, Reif W (2011) Formal verification of QVT transformations for code generation. In: MODELS 2011. LNCS, vol 6981. Springer, Berlin
  53. UML-RSDS toolset and manual (2013) http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/kcl/uml2web/
  54. Varro D, Varro-Gyapay S, Ehrig H, Prange U, Taentzer G (2006) Termination analysis of model transformations by Petri Nets. In: ICGT 2006. LNCS, vol 4178
  55. Z3 Theorem Prover (2012) http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/projects/z3/

Download references