Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness (original) (raw)
Abstract.
In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a fixed amount of money between himself and one other, the recipient. Recent lab studies of these games have produced seemingly inconsistent results, reporting substantially divergent amounts of dictator giving. Also, one prominent explanation for some of these differences, the impact of experimenter observation, displayed weak explanatory power in a different but related lab game. Data from the new experiment reported here offers some explanations. We find that dictators determine how much they will give on the basis of the total money available for the entire experimental session, not on the basis of what is available per game. This explains the reported differences between impunity and dictator studies. When distributing a gift among several recipients, individual dictators show little tendency towards equal treatment. Also, we find no evidence for the experimenter observation effect. Comparison with earlier experiments suggests that differences in the context of the game, affected by differences in written directions and independent of experimenter observation, account for differences across dictator studies. We propose a hypothetical decision procedure, based on the notion that dictator giving originates with personal and social rules that effectively constrain self-interested behavior. The procedure provides a link between dictator behavior and a broader class of laboratory phenomena.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
- Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
- Cancel anytime View plans
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Management Science and Information Systems, 303 Beam, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA (e-mail: geb3@psu.edu), , , , , , US
Gary E. Bolton - Department of Management Science and Information Systems, 303 Beam, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA (e-mail: exk106@psu.edu), , , , , , US
Elena Katok - Department of Marketing, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China (e-mail: mkzwick@uxmail.ust.hk), , , , , , HK
Rami Zwick
Authors
- Gary E. Bolton
- Elena Katok
- Rami Zwick
Additional information
Received August 1993/Final version April 1994
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bolton, G., Katok, E. & Zwick, R. Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness.Game Theory 27, 269–299 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050072
- Issue date: August 1998
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050072