The role of histological investigation in prognostic evaluation of advanced gastric cancer (original) (raw)
Abstract.
The relative contribution of tumour histology or molecular changes, compared with invasion pattern or stage, to prognostic assessment of gastric cancer was investigated in a series of 185 advanced (T2 to T4, stage IB to IV) cancers that had undergone intentionally curative surgery at Varese General Hospital. Survival analysis of the histological types considered in commonly used classifications, such as Lauren, Kubo, the World Health Organization (WHO) and related classifications, allowed separation of a small high-grade (Hg, 12 cases) group of adenosquamous, anaplastic and small cell endocrine carcinomas from a large cohesive group (C, 86 glandular or solid cancers) and from another large (87 cases) group of tumours with dissociated cells [29 diffuse (D) and 58 mixed (M) tumours]. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed the independent prognostic value of this C/M+D/Hg classification approach, which proved superior to other classifications and to cell dissociation at the growing front or angio, lympho and neuroinvasion. Expression of sialyl Lewisc, the DUPAN-2 antigen, proved to be an independent predictor of worse survival among tumours beyond stage I, showing an exclusively or predominantly cohesive structure. Microsatellite instability (MSI) predicted favourable survival in purely cohesive tumours of intermediate (II) stage, especially of solid/medullary and lymphoid stroma/lymphoepithelioma-like structure, among which two distinct tumour subsets were characterised, one MSI-positive and the other Epstein-Barr virus positive. T2N0M0 (stage IB) tumours showed mostly favourable survival independently from histological type, invasive pattern, DUPAN-2 or MSI status. It is concluded that an appropriate histological evaluation, coupled with sialylated glycoproteins histochemistry and, for stage-II tumours, MSI tests may contribute significantly to prognostic assessment of tumours beyond stage I. However, the stage itself, with special reference to lymph-node metastases and invasion level beyond subserosa, remains the most important prognostic clue for gastric cancer.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Pathology, Ospedale di Circolo, viale Borri 57, 21100 Varese, Italy
Carlo Capella - Department of Pathology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Anna Chiaravalli, Matteo Cornaggia & Daniela Furlan - Department of Pathology, University of Genova, Italy
Roberto Fiocca - U.O. Registro Tumori, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
Giovanna Tagliabue - Medical Statistics Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Catherine Klersy - Department of Pathology, University of Pavia and IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Enrico Solcia
Authors
- Anna Chiaravalli
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Matteo Cornaggia
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Daniela Furlan
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Carlo Capella
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Roberto Fiocca
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Giovanna Tagliabue
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Catherine Klersy
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Enrico Solcia
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiaravalli, A., Cornaggia, M., Furlan, D. et al. The role of histological investigation in prognostic evaluation of advanced gastric cancer.Virchows Arch 439, 158–169 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004280100441
- Received: 09 November 2000
- Accepted: 15 February 2001
- Published: 06 April 2001
- Issue Date: August 2001
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004280100441