Interactions between hemoparasite status and female age in the primary reproductive output of pied flycatchers (original) (raw)

Abstract

The relationship between hemoparasite infection (measured just after egg laying) and primary reproductive output (laying date, clutch size and egg volume) was studied in female pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca, of different ages (2 years old vs. 4 or more years old). The hemoparasite (Haemoproteus balmorali and Trypanosoma spp.) prevalence increased with advancing female age. _H. balmorali_-infected females initiated egg laying earlier and laid larger clutches. There was no evidence that infected females laid smaller eggs or had a lower body mass after egg laying than non-infected ones. Only for _H. balmorali_-infected females was there an increase in clutch size between age groups. The present results suggest that primary reproductive output of females will depend on their health-dependent residual reproductive value. Only old females may be able to control a chronic or latent infection by hemoparasites and thereby invest more heavily in reproduction than younger but experienced females. Alternatively, high hemoparasite prevalence may be the cause of increased female primary reproductive output in old females.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain
    Juan José Sanz, Elena Arriero, Juan Moreno & Santiago Merino

Authors

  1. Juan José Sanz
  2. Elena Arriero
  3. Juan Moreno
  4. Santiago Merino

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanz, J., Arriero, E., Moreno, J. et al. Interactions between hemoparasite status and female age in the primary reproductive output of pied flycatchers.Oecologia 126, 339–344 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000530

Download citation

Keywords