Predation against birds with low immunocompetence (original) (raw)

Abstract

Differences in the phenotypic characteristics between individuals falling prey to predators and conspecifics avoiding predation will reflect the intensity of selection on prey. If prey are generally in poor condition, we predicted that they should have an inferior health status in comparison to individuals dying for other reasons. We investigated this prediction for prey and conspecifics that did not die from predation by comparing the size of the spleen, which is an important immune defence organ reflecting one component of immunocompetence, using 18 species of passerine birds and domestic cat Felis catus predators as a model system. Prey had consistently smaller spleens than non-prey, implying that they had weak immune systems. The data set did not indicate that sex or age, month of death, body mass, body condition, liver mass, wing length or tarsus length differed significantly between prey and non-prey. Thus there was little evidence of confounding factors affecting the results. These observations indirectly suggest that disease and parasitism may play an important role in predator-prey interactions.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d’Ecologie, CNRS UMR 7625, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France e-mail: amoller@hall.snv.jussieu.fr Tel.: +33-1-44272594, Fax: +33-1-44273516, , , , , , FR
    A. P. Møller
  2. Taps Old Rectory, DK-6040 Christiansfeld, Denmark, , , , , , DK
    J. Erritzøe

Authors

  1. A. P. Møller
  2. J. Erritzøe

Additional information

Received: 4 August 1999 / Accepted: 7 October 1999

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Møller, A., Erritzøe, J. Predation against birds with low immunocompetence.Oecologia 122, 500–504 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050972

Download citation