Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring (original) (raw)
References
Bas Y, Devictor V, Moussus JP, Jiguet F (2008) Accounting for weather and time-of-day parameters when analyzing count data from monitoring programs. Biodivers Conserv 17:3403–3416 Article Google Scholar
Beaubien EG, Hamann A (2011) Plant phenology networks of citizen scientists: recommendations from two decades of experience in Canada. Int J Biometeorol 55:833–841 Article Google Scholar
Bell JJ (2007) The use of volunteers for conducting sponge biodiversity assessments and monitoring using a morphological approach on Indo-Pacific coral reefs. Aquat Conserv 17:133–145 Article Google Scholar
Both C, van Asch M, Bijlsma RG, van den Burg AB, Visser ME (2009) Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? J Anim Ecol 78:73–83 Article Google Scholar
Boudreau SA, Yan ND (2004) Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based surveillance program for an aquatic invader Bythotrephes. Environ Monit Assess 91:17–26 Article Google Scholar
Brossard D, Lewenstein B, Bonney R (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int J Sci Educ 27:1099–1121 Article Google Scholar
Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365 Article Google Scholar
Cooper CB (2013) Is there a weekend bias in clutch-initiation dates from citizen science? Implications for studies of avian breeding phenology. Int J Biometeorol 58:1415–1419
Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips TB, Bonney R (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12:11 Google Scholar
Couter JR, Johnson RJ, Stuyck CM, Lang BA, Kaiser EW (2012) Weekend bias in citizen science data reporting: implications for phenology studies. Int J Biometeorol 57:715–720 Article Google Scholar
Crall, AW, Newman GJ, Stohlgren TJ, Holfelder KA, Graham J, DM Waller (2011) Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study. Conservation Letters 0:1–10
Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B (2008) Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biol Invasions 10:117–128 Article Google Scholar
Dickinson JL, Zuckerberg B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:149–172 Article Google Scholar
Edwards M, Richardson AJ (2004) Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430:881–884 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Fore LS, Paulsen K, O’Laughlin K (2001) Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biol 46(1):109–123 Article Google Scholar
Foster-Smith J, Evans SM (2003) The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biol Conserv 113:199–213 Article Google Scholar
Galloway AWE, Tudor MT, Vander Haegen WM (2006) The reliability of citizen science: a case study of Oregon white oak stand surveys. Wildlife Soc B 34:1425–1429 Article Google Scholar
Gardiner MM, Allee LL, Brown PMJ, Losey JE, Roy HE, Smyth RR (2012) Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs. Front Ecol Environ 10:471–476 Article Google Scholar
Greenwood J (2007) Citizens, science and bird conservation. J Ornithol 148:77–124 Article Google Scholar
Haklay M (2010) How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environ Plann B 37:682–703 Article Google Scholar
Ingwell LI, Preisser EL (2010) Using citizen science programs to identify host resistance in pest-invaded forests. Conserv Biol 25:182–188 Article Google Scholar
Jiguet F (2009) Method learning caused by a first-time observer effect in a newly started breeding bird survey. Bird Study 56:253–258 Article Google Scholar
Koch E (2010) Global framework for data collection—data bases, data availability, future networks, online databases. In: Hudson IL, Keatley MR (eds) Phenological research: methods for environmental and climate change analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 23–61 Chapter Google Scholar
Kremen C, Ullmann KS, Thorp RW (2010) Evaluating the quality of citizen-scientist data on pollinator communities. Conserv Biol 25:607–617 Article Google Scholar
Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2009) An assessment of the use of volunteers for terrestrial invertebrate biodiversity surveys. Biodivers Conserv 18:3295–3307 Article Google Scholar
Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10:710–717 Article Google Scholar
Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kubler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska O, Briede A et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12:1969–1976
Nerbonne JF, Vondracek B (2003) Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: assessing training needs through examining error and bias in untrained volunteers. J N Am Benthol Soc 22:152–163 Article Google Scholar
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Pearce-Higgins JW, Yalden DW, Whittingham MJ (2005) Warmer springs advance the breeding phenology of golden plovers Pluvialis apricaria and their prey (Tipulidae). Oecologia 143:470–476 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Schmeller DS, Henry P-Y, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F, Lengyel S, Nowicki P, Déri E, Budrys E, Kull T, Tali K, Bauch B, Settele J, Van Swaay C, Kobler A, Babij V, Papastergiadou E, Henle K (2009) Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol 23:307–316 Article Google Scholar
Siebeck UE, Marshall NJ, Klüter A, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2006) Monitoring coral bleaching using a colour reference card. Coral Reefs 25:453–460 Article Google Scholar
Sparks TH, Huber K, Tryianowski P (2008) Something for the weekend? Examining the bias in avian phenological recording. Int J Biometeorol 52:505–510 Article Google Scholar
Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, Burthe S, Bacon PJ, Bell JR, Botham MS, Brereton TM, Bright PW, Carvalho L, Clutton-Brock T, Dawson A, Edwards M, Elliott JM, Harrington R, Johns D, Jones ID, Jones JT, Leech DI, Roy DB, Scott WA, Smith M, Smithers RJ, Winfield IJ, Wanless S (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Change Biol 16:3304–3313 Article Google Scholar
Tregidgo, DJ, SE West, and MR Ashmore (2014) Can citizen science produce good science? Testing the OPAL Air Survey methodology, using lichens as indicators of nitrogenous pollution. Environ Pollut 182:448–451
Trumbull D, Bonney R, Bascom D, Cabral A (2000) Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Sci Educ 84:265–275 Article Google Scholar
Walther G, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate changes. Nature 416:389–395 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Winder M, Schindler D (2004) Climate change uncouples trophic interactions in an aquatic system. Ecology 85:2100–2106 Article Google Scholar
Wolkovich EM, Cook BI, Allen JM, Crimmins TM, Travers S, Pau S, Regetz J, Davies TJ, Betancourt JL, Kraft NJB, Ault TR, Bolmgren K, Mazer SJ, McCabe GJ, McGill BJ, Parmesan C, Salamin N, Schwartz MD, Cleland EE (2012) Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485:494–497 CAS Google Scholar