How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? (original) (raw)

Abstract

When novel and familiar faces are viewed simultaneously, humans and monkeys show a preference for looking at the novel face. The facial features attended to in familiar and novel faces, were determined by analyzing the visual exploration patterns, or scanpaths, of four monkeys performing a visual paired comparison task. In this task, the viewer was first familiarized with an image and then it was presented simultaneously with a novel and the familiar image. A looking preference for the novel image indicated that the viewer recognized the familiar image and hence differentiates between the familiar and the novel images. Scanpaths and relative looking preference were compared for four types of images: (1) familiar and novel objects, (2) familiar and novel monkey faces with neutral expressions, (3) familiar and novel inverted monkey faces, and (4) faces from the same monkey with different facial expressions. Looking time was significantly longer for the novel face, whether it was neutral, expressing an emotion, or inverted. Monkeys did not show a preference, or an aversion, for looking at aggressive or affiliative facial expressions. The analysis of scanpaths indicated that the eyes were the most explored facial feature in all faces. When faces expressed emotions such as a fear grimace, then monkeys scanned features of the face, which contributed to the uniqueness of the expression. Inverted facial images were scanned similarly to upright images. Precise measurement of eye movements during the visual paired comparison task, allowed a novel and more quantitative assessment of the perceptual processes involved the spontaneous visual exploration of faces and facial expressions. These studies indicate that non-human primates carry out the visual analysis of complex images such as faces in a characteristic and quantifiable manner.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Altman SA (ed) (1967) Social communication among primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Bachevalier J, Brickson M, Hagger C (1993) Limbic-dependent recognition memory in monkeys develops early in infancy. Neuroreport 4:77–80
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartlett JC, Searcy J (1993) Inversion and configuration of faces. Cogn Psychol 25:281–316
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bruce C (1982) Face recognition by monkeys: absence of an inversion effect. Neurophsychologia 20:515–521
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Buffalo EA, Ramus SJ, Clark RE, Teng E, Squire LR, Zola SM (1999) Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE. Learn Mem 6:572–99
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chalazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R (1993) A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363:345–347
  Google Scholar
• Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
• Chevalier-Skolnikoff S (1973) Facial expressions of emotion in non-human primates. In: Ekman P (ed) Darwin and facial expressions. Academic Press, New York, pp 11–90
• Daffner KR, Mesulam MM, Cohen LG, Scinto LF (1999) Mechanisms underlying diminished novelty-seeking behavior in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 12:58–66
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• De Waal FB (1989) Peacemaking among the primates. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.
• Diamond R, Carey S (1986) Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J Exp Psychol 115:107–117
  CAS Google Scholar
• Dittrich WH (1990) Representation of faces in longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Ethology 85:265–278
  Google Scholar
• Dittrich WH (1994) How monkeys see others: discrimination and recognition of monkeys' shape. Behav Processes 33:139–154
  Article Google Scholar
• Fagan JF (1972) Infants' recognition memory for faces J Exp Child Psychol 143:453–76
  Google Scholar
• Farah MJ, Tanaka JW, Drain HM (1995) What causes the face inversion effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:628–634
  Google Scholar
• Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (1998) What is "special" about face perception? Psychol Rev 105:482–498
  Google Scholar
• Gunderson VM, Swartz KB (1985) Visual recognition in infant pigtailed macaques after 24-hour delay. Am J Primatol 8:259–264
  Google Scholar
• Gunderson VM, Grant-Webster KS, Burbacher TM, Mottet NK (1988) Visual recognition memory deficits in methylmercury-exposed Macaca fascicularis infants. Neurotoxicol Teratol 10:373–379
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gunderson VM, Grant-Webster KS, Sackett GP (1989) Deficits in visual recognition in low birth weight infant pigtailed monkeys (Macaca nemestrina). Child Dev 60:119–127
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hinde RA, Rowel TE (1962) Communications by postures and facial expressions in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Proc Zool Soc (Lond) 138:1–21
  Google Scholar
• Kanwisher N (2000) Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci 38:759–63
  Article Google Scholar
• Keating CF, Keating EG (1982) Visual scan patterns of rhesus monkeys viewing faces. Perception 11:211–219
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Keating CF, Keating EG (1993) Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face. J Comp Psychol 107:131–139
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kyes RC, Candland DK (1987) Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regins of the face. J Comp Psychol 101:345–348
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Luria AR, Pravdina-Vinarskaya EN, Yarbus AL (1964) Eye movement mechanisms in normal and pathological vision. Sov Psychol Psychiatry 2:28–39
  Google Scholar
• Macworth NH, Morandi AJ (1967) The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Percept Psychophys 2:547–551
  Google Scholar
• Nahm FKD, Perrett A, Amaral DG, Albright TD (1998) How do monkeys look at faces? J Cogn Neurosci 9:611–623
  Google Scholar
• Overman WH, Doty RW (1982) Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces. Neuropsychologia 20:113–28
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Parr LA, Dove T, Hopkins WD (1998) Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. J Cogn Neurosci 10:615–622
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Parr LA, Winslow IT, Hopkins WD (1999) Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkey face-specific? Anim Cogn 2:123–129
  Google Scholar
• Pascalis O, Bachevalier J (1999) Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by visual paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus 6:609–616
  Article Google Scholar
• Pascalis O, de Haan M, Nelson CA, de Schonen S (1998) Long-term recognition memory for faces assessed by visual paired comparison in 3- and 6-month-old infants. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 24:249–60
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Phelps MT, Roberts WA (1994) Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columbia livia). J Comp Psychol 108:114–125
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Redican WK (1975) Facial expressions in non-human primates. In: Rosenblum LA (ed) Primate behavior: developments in field and laboratory research vol 4, Academic Press, New York, pp 103–194
• Rizzo M, Hurtig R, Damasio AR (1987) The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning. Ann Neurol 22:41–45
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Robinson DA (1963) A method of measuring eye movements using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 10:137–145
  CAS Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld SA, Van Hoesen GW (1979) Face recognition in the rhesus monkey. Neuropsychologia 175:503–509
  Article Google Scholar
• Swartz KB (1983) Species discrimination in infant pigtail macaques with pictorial stimuli. Dev Psychobiol 16:219–31
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanaka JW, Farah MJ (1991) Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: testing a theory of face perception. Percept Psychophys 50:367–72
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tarr MJ, Gauthier I (2000) FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci 3:764–769
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tomonaga M, Itakura S, Matsuzawa T (1993) Superiority of conspecific faces and reduced inversion effect in face perception by a chimpanzee. Folia Primatol Int J Primatol (Basel) 61:110–4
  Google Scholar
• van Hoff J (1967) The facial displays of the catarrhine monkeys and apes. In: Morris D (ed) Primate ethology, 1st edn. Aldine, Chicago, pp 7–68
• Vermeire BA, Hamilton CR (1998) Inversion effect for faces in split-brain monkeys. Neuropsychologia 36:1003–1014
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Walker-Smith GJ, Gale AG, Findlay JM (1977) Eye movement strategies involved in face perception. Perception 63:313–26
  Google Scholar
• Wright AA, Roberts WA (1996) Monkey and human face perception: inversion effects for human but not for monkey faces or scenes. J Cogn Neurosci 8:278–290
  Google Scholar
• Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New York
• Yin RK (1969) Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 81:141–145
  Google Scholar
• Zola SM, Squire LR, Teng E, Stefanacci L Buffalo EA, Clark RE (2000) Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J Neurosci 20:451–463
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Erin Mitchell for help with animal training, data collection, and image editing. Melody Haworth, GregVicino, Ji-Young Woo and Henry Alitto were members of the videotaping crew. Melody Haworth also helped with image editing. Daniel Bucher wrote programs for data analysis. This study was supported by: K01MH01902, NCRR base grant for the CRPRC, FARDF (Department of Psychiatry, UC Davis, CA), RR00169 MH/MHD5750201A1 and AG03376.

Author information

Author notes

1. Katalin M. Gothard
   Present address: Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, 329 Life Sciences North Bldg., Tucson, AZ 85724, USA

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California Davis, 2230 Stokton Blvd., Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
   Katalin M. Gothard & David G. Amaral
2. California Regional Primate Research Center, County Rd. 98, Davis, CA 95616, USA
   Katalin M. Gothard, Cynthia A. Erickson & David G. Amaral
3. ARL-Neural System Memory and Aging, The University of Arizona, 384 Life Sciences North Bldg., Tucson, AZ 85724 , USA
   Cynthia A. Erickson
4. Center for Neuroscience, 1455 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95616, USA
   David G. Amaral
5. The M.I.N.D. Institute, 4860 Y Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
   David G. Amaral

Authors

1. Katalin M. Gothard
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. Cynthia A. Erickson
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
3. David G. Amaral
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toKatalin M. Gothard.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gothard, K.M., Erickson, C.A. & Amaral, D.G. How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task?.Anim Cogn 7, 25–36 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0179-6

Download citation

• Received: 24 July 2002
• Revised: 17 March 2003
• Accepted: 19 May 2003
• Published: 09 July 2003
• Issue Date: January 2004
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0179-6

Keywords