A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance (original) (raw)

• Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N et al (2010) Assessing the performance of predictive models. Epidemiology 21(1):128–138
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, ter Riet G, Duley L et al (2008) Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia:systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 12(6):1–270
  Google Scholar
• Jacobi C, de Bock GH, Seigerink B, van Asperen CJ (2009) Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose? Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:381–390
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model. Br Med J 338:b604
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams C, Brunskill S, Altman D, Briggs A, Campbell H, Clarke M et al. (2006) Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy. Health Technol Assess 10(34)
• Altman D (2009) Prognostic models: a methodological framework and review of models for breast cancer. Cancer Invest 27:235–243
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen WY, Colditz GA (2007) Risk factors and hormone-receptor status: epidemiology, risk-prediction models and treatment implications for breast cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4(7):415–423
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K et al (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148(5):337–347
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosner B, Colditz GA, Iglehart JD, Hankinson SE (2008) Risk prediction models with incomplete data with application to prediction of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: prospective data from the Nurses’ Health Study. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R55
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Stata Corporation. Statistical software release 11.0. 2009. College Station, Texas
• Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ (2011) The interpretation of random effects meta-analysis. Br Med J 342:d549
  Article Google Scholar
• Rockhill B, Byrne C, Rosner B, Louie MM, Colditz G (2003) Breast cancer risk prediction with a log-incidence model: evaluation of accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 56(9):856–861
  Google Scholar
• Viallon V, Ragusa S, Clavel-Chapelon F, Bénichou J (2009) How to evaluate the calibration of a disease risk prediction tool. Stat Med 28(6):901–916
  Google Scholar
• Arne GN (2009) Breast cancer risk assessments to barrier contraception exposure. A new approach. Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite Oddelenie Za Bioloshki i Meditsinski Nauki Prilozi 30(1):217–232
  Google Scholar
• Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, Vacek PM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Carney PA et al (2006) Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1204–1214
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Cook NR, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA (2009) Mammographic screening and risk factors for breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 170(11):1422–1432
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Boyle PM (2004) Contribution of three components to individual cancer risk predicting breast cancer risk in Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev 13(3):183–191
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Graubard B, Schairer C, Byrne C et al (2006) Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(17):1215–1226
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Colditz GA, Rosner B (2000) Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 152(10):950–964
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rosner B, Colditz GA, Willett WC (1994) Reproductive risk factors in a prospective study of breast cancer: the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 139(8):819–835
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Decarli A, Calza S, Masala G, Specchia C, Palli D, Gail MH et al (2006) Gail model for prediction of absolute risk of invasive breast cancer: independent evaluation in the Florence-European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(23):1686–1693
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C et al (1989) Projecting individualised probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Constantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J et al (2010) Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(18):1541–1548
  Google Scholar
• Gail MH, Constantino JP, Pee D, Bondy M, Newmon L, Selvan M et al (2007) Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(23):1782–1792
  Google Scholar
• Novotny J, Pecen L, Petruzelka L, Svobodnik A, Dusek L, Danes J et al (2006) Breast cancer risk assessment in the Czech female population—an adjustment of the original Gail model. Breast Cancer Res Treat 95:29–35
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosner B, Colditz GA (1996) Nurses Health study: log-incidence mathematical model of breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 88(6):359–364
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K (2005) Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 94(2):115–122
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. [Erratum appears in Stat Med. 2005 Jan 15;24(1):156]. Stat Med 2004; 23(7):1111–1130
• Wacholder S, Hartge P, Prentice R, Garcia-Closas M, Feigelson HS, Diver WR et al (2010) Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models. N Engl J Med 362(11):986–993
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bondy MLL (1994) Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):20
  Google Scholar
• Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Benichou J et al (1999) Validation of studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(18):1541–1548
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Spiegelman DC (1994) Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 86(8):20
  Google Scholar
• Amir E, Evans DG, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Moran A, Boggis C et al (2003) Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme. J Med Genet 40(11):807–814
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA (2001) Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(5):358–366
  Google Scholar
• Schonfeld SJ, Pee D, Greenlee RT, Hartge P, Lacy JV Jr, Park Y et al (2010) Effect of changing breast cancer incidence rates on the calibration of the Gail model. J Clin Oncol 28(14):2411–2417
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ulusoy C, Kepenekci I, Kose K, Aydintug S, Cam R (2010) Applicability of the gail model for breast cancer risk assessment in turkish female population and evaluation of breastfeeding as a risk factor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(2):419–424
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Amir EFreedman (2010) Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: A review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(10):680–691
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Diez Collar MC, Ortega MP, Villanueva OR, Albaladejo VR, Astasio AP, Calle Puron ME et al (2000) Epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer development in pre and postmenopausal women [Spanish]. Med Clin 115(8):281–286
  CAS Google Scholar
• Mallett S, Royston P, Dutton S, Waters R, Altman D (2010) Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med 8:20
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Mallett S, Royston P, Dutton S, Waters R, Altman D (2010) Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review. BMC Med 8:21
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Janssens AC, Ioannidis J, van Duijn CM, Little J, Khoury MJ et al (2011) Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: The GRIPS Statement. PLoS Med 8(3):e1000420
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Collins G. Opening up multivariable prediction models. http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2011/08/03/gary-collins-opening-up-multivariable-prediction-models. Accessed September 2011
• Bleeker SE, Moll HA, Steyerberg EW, Donders AR, Derksen-Lubsen G, Grobbee DE et al (2003) External validation is necessary in prediction research: A clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 56:826–832
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS et al (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 5:e165
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Agrawal R, Sharma S, Bekir J, Conway G, Bailey J, Balen AH et al (2004) Prevalence of polycystic ovaries and polycystic ovary syndrome in lesbian women compared with heterosexual women. Fertil Steril 82(5):1352–1357
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Elmore JGF (2006) The risk of cancer risk prediction: “What is my risk of getting breast cancer?”. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(23):06
  Google Scholar
• Cook NR (2010) Assessing the incremental role of novel and emerging risk factors. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 4:112–119
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RBS, D’Agostino RBJ, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172
  Article PubMed Google Scholar