Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: new insights for academic based research (original) (raw)

References

• Ackers, L. (2005). Moving people and knowledge: Scientific mobility in the European Union. International Migration, 43(5), 99–131.
  Article Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G. (2000). The changing academic workplace: Comparative perspectives. Boston: Center for International Higher Education.
  Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. G. (2003). The decline of the Guru: The academic profession in developing and middle-income COUNTRIES. New York: Palgrave.
  Book Google Scholar
• Auriol, L., Felix, B., & Schaaper, M. (2010). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft Guidelines, Model Questionnaire and Indicators—the OECD/UNESCO Institute for Statistics/EUROSTAT Careers of Doctorate Holders Project. Paris: OECD.
  Book Google Scholar
• Bean, L., Cummings, M. & Mangold, W. (1996). An examination of academic inbreeding on MIS: Can Institutions Afford to turn away their own graduates?. proceedings of the 1996 IRA International Conference, Information Resources Management Association, Washington, DC.
• Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  Google Scholar
• Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011). The Australian academic profession in transition—addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce, Report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations. September: University of Melbourne.
  Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2005). Professor and Sensei: The construction of faculty roles in the United States and Japan. Higher Education Forum, 2, 71–92.
  Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., & Hostaker, R. (2004). Modernizing research training-education and science policy between profession, discipline and academic Institution. Higher Education Policy, 17, 221–236.
  Article Google Scholar
• Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29(2), 142–153.
  Article Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599–616.
  Article Google Scholar
• Branco, L., Ponomariov, B. L., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical capital. Research Policy, 39(5), 613–624.
  Article Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26.
  Article Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., & Vepsalainen, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 115–126.
  Article Google Scholar
• Caplow, T., & McGee, R. (1958). The academic marketplace. New York: Doubleday.
  Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences. New York: Routledge.
  Google Scholar
• Clark, M. J., & Centra, J. A. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.Ds. Research in Higher Education, 23, 256–269.
  Article Google Scholar
• Conceição, P., & Heitor, M. V. (2005). Innovation for all? Learning from the Portuguese Path to technical change and the dynamics of innovation. Westport: Praeger.
  Google Scholar
• Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thomson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2010). Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes. Research Policy, 39(1), 27–38.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D. (2002). Japanese universities: Independence days. Nature, 419, 875–876.
  Article Google Scholar
• Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education to whose image? Exploring the concept of ‘world class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21, 83–97.
  Article Google Scholar
• Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305.
  Article Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 87–107.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34, 349–367.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dillon, N. (2003). The postdoctoral system under the spotlight: A European Union Directive regulating fixed-term contracts has focused attention on scientific career structures and could have long-term effects on European science. EMBO Reports, 4(1), 2–4.
  Article Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E. (1980). The impact of inbreeding and immobility on the professional role and scholarly performance of academic scientists. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, pp 7–11, April 1980.
• Eells, W. C., & Cleveland, A. C. (1935). Faculty inbreeding. The Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 261–269.
  Article Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1995). White Paper on Education and Learning – Towards the Learning Society. November, COM, 1995, p. 590.
• European Commission. (2011). Towards a European framework for research careers. 21st July 2011.
• Evans, J. A. (2010). Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(5), 757–791.
  Article Google Scholar
• Feller, I., Ailes, C. P., & Roessner, J. D. (2002). Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: Evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy, 31, 457–474.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.
  Article Google Scholar
• Frank, D. J., & Gabler, J. (2006). Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in the 20th Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, W. O. (1971). Inputs, outputs and the prestige of University Science Departments. Sociology of Education, 44(4), 375–397.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hargens, L. L., & Farr, G. M. (1973). An examination of recent hypotheses about Institutional Inbreeding. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1381–1402.
  Article Google Scholar
• Heinze, T., Shapira, P., Rogers, J. D., & Senker, J. M. (2009). Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Research Policy, 38(4), 610–623.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., & Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. (2009). Changing academic mobility patterns and international migration: What will academic mobility mean in the 21st century? Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(3), 347–364.
  Article Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. B. (1938). Ingroup membership and the academic selection. American Sociological Review, 3, 826–833.
  Article Google Scholar
• Horta, H. (2008). On improving the university research base: The Technical University of Lisbon case in perspective. Higher Education Policy, 21, 123–146.
  Article Google Scholar
• Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: Does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? Higher Education, 58(5), 689–721.
  Article Google Scholar
• Horta, H., Veloso, F., & Grediaga, R. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 414–429.
  Article Google Scholar
• Horta, H., Sato, M., & Yonezawa, A. (2011). Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 35–44.
  Article Google Scholar
• Inanc, O., & Tuncer, O. (2011). The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics, 88(3), 885–898.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. M. (1994). What we have learned about faculty workload: the best evidence. In J. F. Wergin (Ed.) Analyzing faculty workload. New directions for Institutional Research, No. 83, 15-24. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Krosnick, J. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behavior among university faculty, 1980–2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35–48.
  Article Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., Karseth, B., & Blume, S. (1999). International mobility among Nordic doctoral students. Higher Education, 38(4), 379–400.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., Crockett, J. L., & Hunter, L. A. (2008). Gendered academic careers: Specializing for success? Social Forces, 86(3), 1273–1309.
  Article Google Scholar
• Locke, W., Cummings, W. K., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2011). Changing governance and management in higher education—The perspectives of the Academy. Dordrecht: Springer.
  Google Scholar
• McGee, R. (1960). The function of institutional inbreeding. The American Journal of Sociology, 65(5), 483–488.
  Article Google Scholar
• McNeely, J. H. (1932). Faculty inbreeding in land-grant Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: Office of Education.
  Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., & Cardinal, L. B. (2005). The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: Accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(5), 489–516.
  Article Google Scholar
• Navarro, A., & Rivero, A. (2001). High rate of Inbreeding in Spanish Universities. Nature, 410, 14.
  Article Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). Reviews of National Policies for Education—Tertiary Education in Portugal. Paris: OECD.
  Google Scholar
• Padilla, L. E. (2008). How have Mexican faculty been trained? A national perspective and a case study. Higher Education, 56, 167–183.
  Article Google Scholar
• Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: Wiley.
  Google Scholar
• Perotti, R. (2008). L’università truccata. Roma: Einaudi.
  Google Scholar
• Reeves, F. W., Henry, N. B., Kelly, F. J., Klein, A. J., & Russell, J. D. (1933). The university faculty. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  Google Scholar
• Shimbori, M. (1981). The Japanese academic profession. Higher Education, 10, 75–87.
  Article Google Scholar
• Shin, J. C. (2011). Teaching and research nexuses across faculty career stage, ability and affiliated discipline in a South Korean research university. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 485–503.
  Article Google Scholar
• Smolentseva, A. (2003). Challenges to the Russian Academic Profession. Higher Education, 45(4), 391–424.
  Article Google Scholar
• Soares, V. M., & Trindade, A. R. (2003). The attractiveness of the academic careers in Portugal. Porto: CIPES.
  Google Scholar
• Soler, M. (2001). How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe. Nature, 411, 132.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stephan, P., & Ma, J. (2005). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctorate career stage. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 71–75.
  Article Google Scholar
• Walstad, W., & Allgood, S. (2005). Views of teaching and research in economics and other disciplines. American Economic Review, 95(2), 177–183.
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams, A. M., Balaz, V., & Wallace, C. (2004). International labour mobility and uneven regional development in Europe—human capital, knowledge and entrepreneurship. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1), 27–46.
  Article Google Scholar
• Wyer, J. C., & Conrad, C. F. (1984). Institutional inbreeding reexamined. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 213–225.
  Google Scholar
• Yamanoi, A. (2005). The academic marketplace in Japan: Inbreeding, grades and organization at Research Universities. Higher Education Forum, 2, 93–114.
  Google Scholar

Download references