Infighting and Ideology: How Conflict Informs the Local Culture of the Chicago Dyke March (original) (raw)

Abstract

Although the study of local cultures has become established in American sociology, it often ignores the contested nature of how culture emerges and is negotiated within the context of small groups. To this end, we address the concept of infighting, a subtype of conflict, as it operates within a small group framework. Building on an ethnographic study of the Chicago Dyke March, we demonstrate that infighting highlights competing ideologies that may remain implicit in the absence of such conflict. Infighting treats divergent meaning systems as part of local contention between rival cliques and power centers. These ideological battles both reflect pre-existing differences between subgroups and serve to make explicit and public such differences, both in their background characteristics and in their interests. In the process infighting directs attention away from shared concerns and group building to questions of strategy, transforming the small group into an arena of ideological production and factional rivalry. Infighting recasts a group from a space of consensus to a contested political arena. We elaborate four analytic processes through which infighting connects to ideology and small group culture: infighting emphasizes the multivocality of meaning, cultural heterogeneity, an equilibrium of inclusion and group boundaries, and planning in light of ideologies of power.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

References

• Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.
  Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A. (2002). Forging gay identities: Organizing sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Berube, A. (1990). Coming out under fire: The history of gay men and women in World War Two. New York: Penguin Books.
  Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Sociology is a martial art (La Sociologie est un Sport de Combat). Edited by Pierre Carles.
• Boutiller, N. (1993). The Dyke March: Celebration, not separation. In Bay Area Reporter (p. 10). San Francisco.
• Brown-Saracino, J., & Ghaziani, A. (2009). The constraints of culture: Evidence from the Chicago Dyke March. Cultural Sociology, 3(1).
• Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: The Free.
  Google Scholar
• Echols, A. (1989). Daring to be bad. Radical feminism in America 1967–1975. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. (1979). Small groups and cultural creation: The idioculture of little league baseball teams. American Sociological Review, 44, 733–745.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. (1987). The strains of idioculture: External threat and internal crisis on a little league baseball team. In G. A. Fine (Ed.), Meaningful play, playful meaning. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A., & Holyfield, L. (1996). Secrecy, trust, and dangerous leisure: Generating group cohesion in voluntary organizations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 22–38.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A., & Sandstrom, K. (1993). Ideology in action: A pragmatic approach to a contested concept. Sociological Theory, 11, 21–38.
  Article Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
  Google Scholar
• Gamson, J. (1997). Messages of exclusion: Gender, movements, and symbolic boundaries. Gender & Society, 11, 178–199.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (2007). But culturalism cannot explain power: A reply to Borer. City and Community, 6(2), 159–160.
  Article Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, A. (2008). The dividends of dissent: How conflict and culture work in lesbian and gay marches on Washington. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Ghaziani, A., & Ventresca, M. (2005). Keywords and cultural change: Frame analysis of business model public talk, 1975-2000. Sociological Forum, 20, 523–559.
  Article Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M. (1968). Ideology and the social system. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 7, 76–85.
  Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Wuthnow, R. (1990). Betwixt and between: Recent cultural sociology in Europe and the United States. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Frontiers of social theory: The new syntheses. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt.
  Google Scholar
• Marx, F., & Engels, F. ([1846] 1976). The German Ideology. In Karl Marx-Frederik Engels Collected Works, 5. New York: International Publishers.
• McLellan, D. (1986). Ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar
• Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68, 103–127.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nestle, J., Howell, C., & Wilchins, R. (Eds.) (2002). Gender queer: Voices from beyond the sexual binary. New York: Alyson Books.
• Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.
  Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern societies. New York: Free Press.
  Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Queen, C. (2001). Sex options. Girlfriends, 7, 10.
  Google Scholar
• Rayner, J. (1980). The uses of ideological language. In D. J. Manning (Ed.), The form of ideology (pp. 90–112). London: Allen and Unwin.
  Google Scholar
• Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 631–660.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ross, E. A. (1920). The principles of society. New York: The Century Company.
  Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. (1997). Difference troubles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups: Exploration into conformity and deviation of adolescents. New York: Harper and Row.
  Google Scholar
• Shively, J. (1992). Cowboys and Indians: Perceptions of Western films among American Indians and Anglos. American Sociological Review, 57, 725–734.
  Article Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. New York: The Free.
  Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., & Rupp, L. J. (1993). Women’s culture and lesbian feminist activism: A reconsideration of cultural feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19, 33–61.
  Article Google Scholar
• Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1995). Analytical approaches to social movement culture: The culture of the women’s movement. In H. Johnston, & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 163–187). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe: The Free.
  Google Scholar
• White, W. (1961). Beyond conformity. New York: Free Press.
  Google Scholar
• Whittier, N. E. (1995). Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (1987). Meaning and moral order: Explorations in cultural analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Society of Fellows, Princeton University, 10 Joseph Henry House, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
   Amin Ghaziani
2. Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, 1810 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA
   Gary Alan Fine

Authors

1. Amin Ghaziani
2. Gary Alan Fine

Corresponding author

Correspondence toAmin Ghaziani.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghaziani, A., Fine, G.A. Infighting and Ideology: How Conflict Informs the Local Culture of the Chicago Dyke March.Int J Polit Cult Soc 20, 51–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-008-9032-x

Download citation

• Published: 09 August 2008
• Issue date: September 2008
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-008-9032-x

Keywords