Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts (original) (raw)
References
Baker, F. (1995). EQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1). Madison: Laboratory of Experimental Design, University of Wisconsin. Google Scholar
Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology,23, 891–906. Article Google Scholar
Cherrington, D. J., Condie, S. J., & England, J. L. (1979). Age and work values. Academy of Management Journal,22, 617–623. Article Google Scholar
Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology,23, 907–928. Article Google Scholar
Duchscher, J. E. B., & Cowin, L. (2004). Multigenerational nurses in the workplace. Journal of Nursing Administration,34, 493–501. Article Google Scholar
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates. Google Scholar
Erickson, T. (2008, August 25). Don’t treat them like baby boomers. Business Week, p. 64.
Flowers, C. P., Oshima, T. C., & Raju, N. S. (1999). A description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT framework. Applied Psychological Measurement,23, 309–326. Article Google Scholar
Kupperschmidt, B. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager,19, 65–76. PubMed Google Scholar
Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Google Scholar
Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology,23, 857–861. Article Google Scholar
Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods,7, 361–388. Article Google Scholar
Meriac, J. P., Poling, T. L., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). Are there gender differences in work ethic?: An examination of the measurement equivalence of the multidimensional work ethic profile. Personality and Individual Differences,47, 209–213. Article Google Scholar
Miller, M. J., Woehr, D. J., & Hudspeth, N. (2002). The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior,60, 451–489. Article Google Scholar
O’Connell, P. O. (2008, August 25). What’s eating gen X. Business Week, pp. 61–62.
Pogson, C., Cober, A., Doverspike, D., & Rogers, J. (2003). Differences in self-reported work ethic across three career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior,62, 189–201. Article Google Scholar
Raju, N. S. (1999). DFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W., & Fleer, P. (1995). An IRT-based internal measure of test bias with implications for differential item functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement,19, 353–368. Article Google Scholar
Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics,4, 207–230. Article Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores [Monograph]. Psychometrika Supplement No. 17.
Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior,23, 363–382. Article Google Scholar
Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement,7, 201–210. Article Google Scholar
ter Bogt, T., Raaijmakers, Q., & van Wel, F. (2005). Socialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Vocational Behavior,66, 420–437. Article Google Scholar
Thissen, D. (2003). MULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc. Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology,23, 862–877. Article Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,3, 4–69. Article Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1904–1905).
Woehr, D. J., Archinega, L., & Lim, D. (2007). Examining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse cultures. Educational and Psychological Measurement,67, 154–168. Article Google Scholar
Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology,23, 878–890. Article Google Scholar
Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (1999). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: Amacom. Google Scholar
Zickar, M., & Broadfoot, A. (2009). The partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theory. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 37–59). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar