Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results (original) (raw)
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Abstract
The gambling industry has offered self-exclusion programs for quite a long time. Such measures are designed to limit access to gaming opportunities and provide problem gamblers with the help they need to cease or limit their gambling behaviour. However, few studies have empirically evaluated these programs. This study has three objectives: (1) to observe the participation in an improved self-exclusion program that includes an initial voluntary evaluation, phone support, and a mandatory meeting, (2) to evaluate satisfaction and usefulness of this service as perceived by self-excluders, (3) to measure the preliminary impact of this improved program. One hundred sixteen self-excluders completed a questionnaire about their satisfaction and their perception of the usefulness during the mandatory meeting. Among those participants, 39 attended an initial meeting. Comparisons between data collected at the initial meeting and data taken at the final meeting were made for those 39 participants. Data showed that gamblers chose the improved self-exclusion program 75% of the time; 25% preferred to sign a regular self-exclusion contract. Among those who chose the improved service, 40% wanted an initial voluntary evaluation and 37% of these individuals actually attended that meeting. Seventy percent of gamblers came to the mandatory meeting, which was a required condition to end their self-exclusion. The majority of participants were satisfied with the improved self-exclusion service and perceived it as useful. Major improvements were observed between the final and the initial evaluation on time and money spent, consequences of gambling, DSM-IV score, and psychological distress. The applicability of an improved self-exclusion program is discussed and, as shown in our study, the inclusion of a final mandatory meeting might not be so repulsive for self-excluders. Future research directives are also proposed.
Access this article
Subscribe and save
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime Subscribe now
Buy Now
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- Frequency, time and money spent declared by the gamblers were calculated to represent a monthly period.
- This questionnaire is available from the authors upon request.
- The 9 statements specific to the participants who chose to have the initial voluntary meeting were excluded from those analyses. Answers falling into the “not applicable” category were also excluded.
References
- American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
Google Scholar - Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, J. D. (2004a). Self-exclusion: A gateway to treatment. Report prepared for the Australian Gaming Council.
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004b). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460. doi:10.1023/A:1009488308348.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar - Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9032-6.
Article PubMed Google Scholar - National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). Final report. Washington, Dc: Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar - Nowatzki, R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2(3–25), 3–25.
Article Google Scholar - Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion Paper by the responsible Gambling Council.
- Sani, A., Carlevaro, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Impact of a counselling session on at-risk casino patrons: A pilot study. Gambling Research, 17, 47–52.
Google Scholar - Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 5, 390–395.
Google Scholar
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by grants from the Fondation Mise-sur-toi (Loto-Quebec).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- School of Psychology, Laval University, 1030 Cherrier, bur 505, Montreal, QC, Canada, H2L 1H9
Nicole Tremblay, Claude Boutin & Robert Ladouceur
Authors
- Nicole Tremblay
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Claude Boutin
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Robert Ladouceur
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence toNicole Tremblay.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tremblay, N., Boutin, C. & Ladouceur, R. Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results.J Gambl Stud 24, 505–518 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9110-z
- Received: 19 December 2007
- Accepted: 08 September 2008
- Published: 25 September 2008
- Issue Date: December 2008
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9110-z