A Taxometric Analysis of Problem Gambling Data from a South African National Urban Sample (original) (raw)

References

• Ahmed, A. O., Green, B. A., Clark, C. B., Stahl, K. C., & McFarland, M. E. (2011). Latent structure of unipolar and bipolar mood symptoms. Bipolar Disorders, 2011(13), 522–536.
  Article Google Scholar
• Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Braverman, J., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). A taxometric analysis of actual internet sports gambling behavior. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 234–244.
  Google Scholar
• Custer, R. L., & Custer, L. F. (1978). Characteristics of the recovering compulsive gambler. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Conference on Problem Gambling, Reno, Nevada.
• Denson, T., & Earleywine, M. (2006). Pothead or pot smoker? A taxometric investigation of cannabis dependence. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy, 1, 22–27.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Stein, D., Thomas, K., & Meintjes, E. (2011). Substance use and abuse in South Africa: Insights from brain and behavioral sciences. Cape Town: UCT Press.
  Google Scholar
• Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  Google Scholar
• Ginestet, C., Mitchell, K., & Wellman, N. (2008). Taxometric investigation of the latent structure of nicotine dependence: An epidemiological sample. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 833–841.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M. (2004). The MAXSLOPE taxometric procedure: Mathematical derivation, parameter estimation, consistency tests. Psychological Reports, 95, 517–550.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Haslam, N., Williams, B., et al. (2006). The latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A taxometric analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(8), 639–647.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Helzer, J. E., Bucholz, K. K., et al. (2007). A dimensional option for the diagnosis of substance dependence in DSM-V. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(S1), S24–S33.
  Google Scholar
• Helzer, J. E., Van Den Brink, W., & Guth, S. E. (2006). Should there be both categorical and dimensional criteria for the substance abuse disorders in DSM-V? Addiction, 101, 17–22.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hodgins, D. (2004). Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: Psychometric evaluation. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 1685–1690.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2009). Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 105–120.
  Google Scholar
• Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of Pathological Gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 451–456.
  Google Scholar
• Lesieur, H., & Blume, S. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Loo, J. M., Oei, T. P., & Raylu, N. (2011). Psychometric evaluation of the Problem Gambling Severity Index-Chinese version (PGSI-C). Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(3), 453–466.
  Google Scholar
• Maitland, S., & Adams, G. (2007). Replication and generalizability of the Problem Gambling Severity Index: Are results consistent and comparable across studies? Final report. Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
• Meehl, P. E. (1973). MAXCOV-HITMAX: A taxometric search method for loose genetic syndromes. In P. E. Meehl (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers (pp. 200–224). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 117–174.
  Article Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–274.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (2004). What’s in a taxon? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 39–43.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1994). Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports, 74, 1059–1274.
  Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1996). Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports, 78, 1091–1227.
  Article Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101(s1), 6–16.
• Neal, P., Delfabbro, P. H., & O’Neill, M. (2004). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Report prepared for the National Gambling Research Program Working Party, Melbourne.
• Orford, J., Wardle, H., et al. (2010). PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: Reliability, item response, factor structure and inter-scale agreement. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 31–44.
  Article Google Scholar
• Rawlings, D., Williams, B., et al. (2008). Taxometric analysis supports a dimensional latent structure for schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(8), 1640–1651.
  Article Google Scholar
• Reise, S., & Waller, N. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ross, D., Dellis, A., Hofmeyr, A., Kincaid, H., Sharp, C., & Vucinich, R. (2010). South African National Urban Prevalence Study of Gambling Behaviour. http://uct.academia.edu/DonRoss/Papers/1258256/National_Urban_Prevalence_Study_of_Gambling_Behaviour_in_South_Africa_NUPSGB_Summary_Data.
• Ross, D., Sharp, C., Vuchinich, R., & Spurrett, D. (2008). Midbrain mutiny: The behavioural economics and neuroeconomics of disordered gambling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.
  Google Scholar
• Royston, P. (2007). Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ice, with an emphasis on interval censoring. Stata Journal, 7(4), 445–464.
  Google Scholar
• Royston, P. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata Journal, 9(3), 466–477.
  Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J. (2007). Taxometric analysis: An empirically-grounded approach to implementing the method. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1588–1622.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J. (2009). Assigning cases to groups using taxometric results: An empirical comparison of classification techniques. Assessment, 16, 55–70.
  Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. (2004). Clarifying boundary issues in psychopathology: The role of taxometrics in a comprhensive program of structural research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 145–154.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A., & Meron, M. (2007). Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: Generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 349–386.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J., Walters, G., Marcus, D., & Kaczetow, W. (2010). Grouping the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 5–21.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Saunders, J. B., & Schukitt, M. A. (2006). The development of a research agenda for substance abuse disorders in the diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V). Addiction, 101, 1–5.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Sharp, C., Steinberg, L., Yaroslavsky, I., Hofmeyr, A., Dellis, A., Ross, D., et al. (2012). An item response theory analysis of the Problem Gambling Severity Index in a national representative sample. Assessment, 19(2), 167–175.
  Google Scholar
• Slade, T., Grove, R., & Teesson, M. (2009). A taxometric study of alcohol abuse and dependence in a general population sample: Evidence of dimensional latent structure and implications for DSM-V. Addiction, 104, 742–751.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Solomon, A., Ruscio, J., et al. (2006). A taxometric investigation of unipolar depression in a large community sample. Psychological Medicine, 36(07), 973–985.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Svetieva, E., & Walker, M. (2008). Inconsistency between concept and measurement: The Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI). Journal of Gambling Issues 1s(22), 157–173.
  Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H., & Knook, D. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 1999(18), 681–694.
  Google Scholar
• Waller, N. G., & Meehl, P. E. (1998). Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., Diamond, P., & Magaletta, P. R. (2010). What is the latent structure of alcohol use disorders? A taxometric analysis of the Personality Assessment Inventory Alcohol Problems Scale in male and female prison inmates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(1), 26–37.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Ruscio, J. (2009a). To sum or not to sum: Taxometric analysis with ordered categorical assessment items. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 99–111.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Walters, G. D., & Ruscio, J. (2009b). Where do we draw the line? Assigning cases to subsamples for MAMBAC, MAXCOV, and MAXEIG taxometric analyses. Assessment, 20(10), 1–13.
  Google Scholar
• West, R. (2006). Theory of addiction. Oxford: Blackwell.
  Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000). Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 946–963.
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar

Download references