Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil (original) (raw)

• 1620 Accesses
• 70 Citations
• 3 Altmetric
• Explore all metrics

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Regional variations in the environmental impacts of plant biomass production are significant, and the environmental impacts associated with feedstock supply also contribute substantially to the environmental performance of biobased products. Thus, the regional variations in the environmental performance of biobased products are also significant. This study scrutinizes greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with two biobased products (i.e., ethanol and soybean oil) whose feedstocks (i.e., corn and soybean) are produced in different farming locations.

Methods

We chose 40 counties in Corn Belt States in the United States as biorefinery locations (i.e., corn dry milling, soybean crushing) and farming sites, and estimated cradle-to-gate GHG emissions of ethanol and of soybean oil, respectively. The estimates are based on 1 kg of each biobased product (i.e., ethanol or soybean oil). The system boundary includes biomass production, the biorefinery, and upstream processes. Effects of direct land use change are included in the greenhouse gas analysis and measured as changes in soil organic carbon level, while the effects of indirect land use change are not considered in the baseline calculations. Those indirect effects however are scrutinized in a sensitivity analysis.

Results

GHG emissions of corn-based ethanol range from 1.1 to 2.0 kg of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of ethanol, while GHG emissions of soybean oil are 0.4–2.5 kg of CO2 equivalent per kilogram of soybean oil. Thus, the regional variations due to farming locations are significant (by factors of 2–7). The largest GHG emission sources in ethanol production are N2O emissions from soil during corn cultivation and carbon dioxide from burning the natural gas used in corn dry milling. The second largest GHG emission source groups in the ethanol production system are nitrogen fertilizer (8–12%), carbon sequestration by soil (−15–2%), and electricity used in corn dry milling (7–16%). The largest GHG emission sources in soybean oil production are N2O emissions from soil during soybean cultivation (13–57%) and carbon dioxide from burning the natural gas used in soybean crushing (21–47%). The second largest GHG emission source groups in soybean oil production are carbon sequestration by soil (−29–24%), diesel used in soybean cultivation (4–24%), and electricity used in the soybean crushing process (10–21%). The indirect land use changes increase GHG emissions of ethanol by 7–38%, depending on the fraction of forest converted when newly converted croplands maintain crop cultivation for 100 years.

Conclusions, recommendations, and perspectives

Farming sites with higher biomass yields, lower nitrogen fertilizer application rates, and less tillage are favorable to future biorefinery locations in terms of global warming. For existing biorefineries, farmers are encouraged to apply a site-specific optimal nitrogen fertilizer application rate, to convert to no-tillage practices and also to adopt winter cover practices whenever possible to reduce the GHG emissions of their biobased products. Current practices for estimating the effects of indirect land use changes suffer from large uncertainties. More research and consensus about system boundaries and allocation issues are needed to reduce uncertainties related to the effects of indirect land use changes.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

• Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
• Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
• Cancel anytime View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• American Soybean Association (2008) Soy Stats 2008. http://www.soystats.com/2008/non-frames.htm, accessed December, 2008
• Argonne National Laboratory (2008) Greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation (GREET) computer model 1.8b. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling_simulation/GREET/index.html, accessed December, 2008
• Arora S, Wu M, Wang M (2008) Update of distillers grains displacement ratios for corn ethanol life-cycle analysis. Argonne National Laboratory. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/AF/527.pdf, accessed December, 2008
• Atkinson B, Mavituna F (1991) Biochemical engineering and biotechnology handbook. Stockton, New York
  Google Scholar
• Conservation Technology Information Center (2007) National Crop Residue Management Survey. http://www.conservationinformation.org/?action=members_crm, accessed December, 2008
• Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Ojima DS, Kulmala AE, Phongpan S (2000) General model for N2O and N2 gas emissions from soils due to denitrification. Global Biogeochem Cycle 14:1045–1060
  Article Google Scholar
• Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ, Mosier AR, Hartman MD, Brenner J, Ojima DS, Schimel DS (2001) Simulated interaction of carbon dynamics and nitrogen trace gas fluxes using the DAYCENT model. In: Shaffer MJ, Ma L, Hansen S (eds) Modeling carbon and nitrogen dynamics for soil management. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 303–332
  Google Scholar
• Ecobilan (2008) DEAMTM LCA database
• Erickson DR (1995) Practical handbook of soybean processing and utilization. AOCS, St. Louis
  Google Scholar
• Jiménez-González C, Kim S, Overcash M (2000) Methodology for developing gate-to-gate life cycle inventory information. Int J LCA 5:153–159
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass & Bioenergy 29:426–439
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE (2008a) Life cycle assessment of fuel ethanol derived from corn grain via dry milling. Bioresource Technol 99:5250–5260
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE (2008b) Annual report for Life cycle assessment to improve the sustainability and competitive position of biobased chemicals: a local approach, funded by the U. S. Department of Energy and the U. S. Department of Agriculture. Grant Agreement No.: 68-3A75-6-509. Michigan State University
• Kim S, Dale BE (2008c) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and economics of corn production. Environ Sci Technol 42:6028–6033
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE, Jenkins R (2008) Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States. Int J LCA 14(2):160–174
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim S, Jiménez-González C, Dale EB (2009a) Enzymes for pharmaceutical applications―a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment. Int J LCA. http://www.springerlink.com/content/t1xg271325q223l0/fulltext.html
• Kim H, Kim S, Dale BE (2009b) Biofuels, land use change and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ Sci Technol 43:961–967
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li Y, Griffing E, Higgins M, Overcash M (2006) Life cycle assessment of soybean oil production. J Food Process Eng 29:429–445
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu K (1997) Soybeans: chemistry, technology, and utilization. Chapman & Hall, New York
  Google Scholar
• McAloon A, Taylor F, Yee W, Ibsen K, Wooley R (2000) Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks. NREL/TP-580-28893. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
  Google Scholar
• Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory (2005) Century soil organic matter model: user's guide and reference, Colorado State University. http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/century5/reference/index.htm, accessed December, 2008
• Office of Industrial Technologies (2000) Chapter 5 Agricultural chemicals: fertilizers, energy and environmental profile of the U.S. chemical industry. In Energy and environmental profile of the U.S. chemical industry. US Department of Energy. http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/chemicals/pdfs/profile_chap5.pdf, accessed December, 2008
• Renewable Fuels Association (2008) Historic U.S. fuel ethanol production. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/, accessed December, 2008
• Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, Shapouri H (1998) Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus. NREL/SR-580-24089. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
  Google Scholar
• Snapp SS, Swinton SM, Labarta R, Mutch D, Black JR, Leep R, Nyiraneza J, O'Neil K (2005) Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs and performance within cropping system niches. Agr J 97:322–332
  Google Scholar
• Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories (2008) The Ecoinvent Database
• United States (2007) The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (H.R. 6). http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6enr.txt.pdf, accessed December, 2008
• United Soybean Board (2008) Product information. http://www.soybiobased.org/productinfo/, accessed December, 2008
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Regulatory impact analysis: renewable fuel standard program—Chapter 6 Life cycle impacts on fossil energy and greenhouse gases. EPA420-R-07-004. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/renewablefuels/420r07004cover-overview.pdf, accessed December, 2008
• Wu M (2008) Analysis of the efficiency of the U.S. ethanol industry 2007. Argonne National Laboratory. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/anl_ethanol_analysis_2007.pdf, accessed December, 2008

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support provided by the U. S. Department of Energy and the U. S. Department of Agriculture (Grant Agreement No. 68-3A75-6-509) and by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (Grant No. DE-FC02-07ER64494).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Chemical and Material Science, Michigan State University, 3900 Collins Road, Lansing, MI, 48910-8396, USA
   Seungdo Kim & Bruce E. Dale

Authors

1. Seungdo Kim
2. Bruce E. Dale

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSeungdo Kim.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S., Dale, B.E. Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil.Int J Life Cycle Assess 14, 540–546 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0106-4

Download citation

• Received: 27 March 2009
• Accepted: 15 May 2009
• Published: 10 June 2009
• Issue date: September 2009
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0106-4

Keywords