Early Cholecystectomy Is Superior to Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: a Meta-analysis (original) (raw)

• Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:1323-1327.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR. Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13:71-75.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Siddiqui T, MacDonald A, Chong PS, Jenkins JT. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Surgery 2008; 195(1): 40-47.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Yamashita Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y, Nimura Y, Hirota M, Miura F, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Strasberg S, Pitt HA, Santibanes ED, Belghiti J, Buchler MW, Gouma DJ, Fan ST, Hilvano SC, Lau JWY, Kim SW, Belli G, Windsor JA, Liau KH, Sachakul V. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2007; 14:91-7
  Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Cameron IC, Chadwick C, Phillips J, Johnson AG. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004; 80:292–4.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 306-312.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sankarankutty A, Luz LT, Campos T, Rizoli S, Fraga GP, Nascimento Jr B. Uncomplicated acute cholecystitis: early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Rev Col Bras Cir. 2012; 39(5): 436-440.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(1): 82-7.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Svanvik, J. (2000), Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Eur J Surg. 166: 16-17. doi: 10.1080/110241500750056472.
  Article Google Scholar
• Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. Ann Surg. 1993; 218: 630–4.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Verma S, Agarwal PN, Bali RS, Singh R, Talwar N. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. ISRN Minim Invasive Surg 2013; vol 2013, Article ID 486107. doi:10.1155/2013/486107
• Miller RE, Kimmelsteil FM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 1993; 7:296–299.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993; 217:233–236.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gutt CN, Encke, J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, Schunter O, Gotze T, Golling MT, Menges M, Klar E, Feilhauer K, Wolfram GZ, Ridwelski K, Ackmann S, Baron A, Schon MR, Seitz HK, Daniel D, Stremmel W, Buchler MW. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Surg 2013; 258(3):385-93.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gul R, Dar RA, Sheikh RA, Salroo NA, Matoo AR, Wani SH. Comparison of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: experience from a single center. N Am J Med Sci 2014; 5(7):414-18.
  Google Scholar
• Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 141–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151:264-269.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001; 5(1):89-94.
  PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghani AA, Haq A. Acute cholecystitis: immediate versus interval cholecystectomy. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute 2005; 19(2):192–5.
  Google Scholar
• Yadav RP, Adhikary S, Agrawal CS, Bhattarai B, Gupta RK, Ghimire A. A comparative study of early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2009;7(25):16-20.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Mare LD. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis after 72 hours of symptoms. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01548339 2012. Accessed Feb 25, 2014.
• Faizi KS, Ahmed I, Ahmad H. Comparison of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: choosing the best. PJM 2013; 7(1):212-5.
  Google Scholar
• Ozkardes AB, Tokaz M, Dumlu EG, Bozkurt B, Ciftci AB, Yetisir F, Kilic M. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg 2014; 99(1):56-61.
  Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7:177-188.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yates F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test. J R Stat Soc. 1934; 1(2):217-235
  Google Scholar
• Haviland MG. Yates’s correction for continuity and analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables. Stat Med. 1990; 9:363-7
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Walter SD. Point estimation of the odds ratio in sparse 2 x 2 contingency tables. Biostatistics. 1987; 71-102
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:557–60.
  Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey S, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997; 315:629-34.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Orwin R. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. JSE. 1983; 8:157-159.
  Google Scholar
• Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials. 1996; 17:1-12.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dixon E, Fowler D, Ghitulescu G. Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Can Chir. 2012; 55(3):204-6
  Google Scholar
• Johner A, Raymakers A, Wiseman SM. Cost utility of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(1):256-62.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Macafee DA, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, Beckingham IJ, Whynes DK, Lobo DN. Prospective randomized trial using cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. BJS. 2009; 96(9):1031–40.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Al-Mulhim AA. Timing of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JSLS. 2008; 12:282-7.
  PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Khan SSA. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, a prospective randomized study. Pak J of Gastroenterol. 2002; 16(2):30–4.
  Google Scholar
• Javed I, Fahim M, Malik NA, Khan MS, Adalat I, Khan JS, Khan M. Evaluation of early urgent versus delayed urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. JRMC. 2013; 17(2):185-188
  Google Scholar
• Nakajima M. Early versus early interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, a prospective randomized controlled trial. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function = brows&action = brows&type = summary&recptno = R000014694&language = E. Accessed May 2, 2014
• Abdellatif M. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy; randomised prospective study. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02130245. Accessed June 12, 2014
• Lai PBS, Kwong KH, Leung KL. Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. BJS. 1998; 85(6):764–7.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lo C, Liu C, Fan S, Lai ECS, Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1998; 227(4):461–7.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Davila D, Manzanares C, Picho ML, Albors P, Cardenas F, Fuster E, Trullenque R. Experience in the treatment (early vs. delayed) of acute cholecystitis via laparoscopy. Cir Esp. 1999; 66(Suppl 1):233.
  Google Scholar
• Chandler CF, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SW. Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surgeon. 2000; 66(9):896–900.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003; 7:642–645.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Thune A, Blomqvist A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Impact of choice of therapeutic strategy for acute cholecystitis on patient’s health-related quality of life. Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Dig Surg. 2004; 21:359–362.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Saber A, Hokkam EN. Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Minimally invasive surgery. 2014; 1-4
• Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2010; 145(8):757-63
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Claria RS, Mazza O, de Santibanes E. Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216:894-901.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 1. Processes used in determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:598.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201:604.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghassemi KF, Shah JN. Postoperative bile duct injuries. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 8:81-91.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lo CM, Liu CL, Lai EC, Fan ST, Wong J. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg. 1996; 223:37–42.
  Article PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sobolev B, Mercer D, Brown P, FitzGerald M, Jalink D, Shaw R. Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. CMAJ. 2003; 169(7)662-5.
  PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Parasyn AD, Truskett PG, Bennett M, Lum S, Barry J, Haghighi K, Crowe PJ. Acute-care surgical service: a change in culture. ANZ J Surg. 2009; 79(1-2):12-8.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Wilson E, Gurusamy K, Gluud C, Davidson BR. A cost utility and value of information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg. 2010; 97: 210–9.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cheruvu CV, Eyre-Brook IA. Consequences of prolonged wait before gallbladder surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002; 84(1):20-2
  PubMed Central CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cox MR, Cook L, Dobson J, Lambrakis P, Ganesh S, Cregan P. Acute surgical unit: a new model of care. ANZ J Surg. 2010;80(6):419-24
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pepingco, L., Eslick, G., Cox, M. The acute surgical unit as a novel model of care for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. MJA. 2012; 196(8), 509-510.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional “on call” model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014; 38(6):1381-7.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar