Emanuele Mariani | Universidade de Lisboa (original) (raw)
Papers by Emanuele Mariani
Per una psicologia della storia : Brentano, lettore di Comte, e la teoria delle quattro fasi della filosofia, 2019
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 2019
Riassunto: La fenomenologia, in virtu del suo stesso nome, pare rivendicare un diritto di prelazi... more Riassunto: La fenomenologia, in virtu del suo stesso nome, pare rivendicare un diritto di prelazione sui fenomeni. E sufficiente, tuttavia, uno sguardo panoramico sulla storia della filosofia o, piu generalmente, delle scienze per rilevare il vasto impiego che si va affermando, senza fenomenologia, del concetto di fenomeno. In cosa consisterebbe allora la specificita della comprensione fenomenologica dei “fenomeni”? Per rispondere a questa domanda, riconsidereremo il dibattito tra Edmund Husserl autore delle Logische Untersuchungen e Paul Natorp, filosofo neokantiano di Marburgo, le cui tesi presentano un duplice interesse: l’avere, per un verso, sollecitato lo stesso Husserl a una precisazione della proposta fenomenologica; l’aver, per l’altro, anticipato alcuni tra gli argomenti di maggior rilievo nell’ambito delle scienze cognitive in merito ai vari tentativi di naturalizzazione della coscienza. Parole chiave: Fenomeno; Intenzionalita; Oggetto; Edmund Husserl; Paul Natorp Phenome...
Phainomenon, 2011
In the most recent debate of phenomenological as well as analytical provenance, Husserl’s reflect... more In the most recent debate of phenomenological as well as analytical provenance, Husserl’s reflection, although pioneer regarding ethics, seems to suffer of a general depreciation enrooted in his supposed excess rationalism. The husserlian ethics would remain subjected to the dominance of a logico-objectifying reason, which appears to be the fundamental dimension of intentionality. The wide range of life-experiences would then be crushed by the hegemony of objectifying acts. Are we really sure? Our contribution will rather consist in raising the originality of Husserl’s method which lastly to reconcile two seemingly contradictory requirements: the autonomy of ethical and its dependence towards logical reason. We shall notice thus a progressive dissociatoon from Brentano’s teaching leading to an overall revision of intentionality. If anything such as rationalism exists in Husserl’s thinking, it can only be asserted on the condition of a radical criticism of the concept of “representat...
Phainomenon, 2021
Via viatores quaerit Entirely dedicated to Heideggerian thought, the present issue of Phainomenon... more Via viatores quaerit Entirely dedicated to Heideggerian thought, the present issue of Phainomenon brings to maturity the fruits of what, at the beginning, was a meeting between scholars, recognized or in the early stages of their careers, linked by institutional affiliation or elective affinity to the Portuguese language and culture. That meeting took place in Évora in 2019, on the basis of a partnership between the University of Évora and the University of Lisbon, under the title of "II Jornadas Heideggerianas", and it intended to carry on the investigations started in the first "Jornadas Heideggerianas de Évora," an event organised in 2013 with the aim of establishing a dialogue between those who, in Portugal, dedicate themselves totally or partially to the study of Martin Heidegger's thought and to the translation of Heidegger's work into Portuguese. More than the title, however, it is the subtitle of the 2019 meeting that allows us to understand the leitmotiv that unites all the contributions presented here: "Heidegger in conversation with Heidegger". Heidegger's self-interpretation of his own trajectory offers, in fact, an essential working criterion for the historical-conceptual analysis of the constituent moments of Heidegger's philosophical vision. The great complexity of such vision raises, at a hermeneutical level and in a very specific sense, the problem of the unity of the workthe Heideggerian work, conceived as a
Phainomenon, 2017
By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not... more By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not been necessary to wait for phenomenology in oder to have a proper account of phenomena. One need only to take a look at the history of philosophy, from Plato to Kant, as well as at the history of sciences, from physics to psychology, so as to register a wide range of uses concerning the concept of phenomenon. The understanding of what a phenomenon is, in a phenomenological sense, should therefore at least not be completely compatible with any other, if phenomenology has to exist as a discipline and as a method. That is one of the issues at stake in the debate between phenomenology and neokantianism, between Husserl, to a certain extent Brentano, and Natorp. It is on this debate that we shall draw attention, if we wish to grasp the reasons behind the phenomenological conception of the phenomenon, especially at the time of the Logische Untersuchungen.
Phainomenon, 2012
Within the Seinsfrage, the question of being, the «who» question, or Werfrage, arises at once. Wh... more Within the Seinsfrage, the question of being, the «who» question, or Werfrage, arises at once. Who is this «who»? In other words, who am I? Questioning the being, inevitably means questioning ourselves. Would it thus be possible to conceive of a subject without being? This question, paradoxical as it may appear, nevertheless has a historiographical legitimacy, if we consider that «phenomenological anthropology», as the young Heidegger conceived it, precedes in effect the formulation of the Seinsfrage. From his very first lectures in Fribourg, an access into subjectivity, apprehended as a «wordly ipseity », is thereby opened. While criticizing Natorp who unreservedly denied such a possibility, Heidegger yet ends up conceding the point almost entirely. This, at least, is our hypothesis: the «I» exists only at the cost of a tension between facticity and existence, a tension which, in the eyes of Natorp, leads to a confirmation that the «I», strictly speaking, cannot be – and this allow...
Les Études philosophiques, 2018
Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment ... more Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.
Studia Phaenomenologica, 2020
Just hearing the names of Brentano and Plato put together is enough to highlight the queerness of... more Just hearing the names of Brentano and Plato put together is enough to highlight the queerness of a matching which finds almost no evidence in critical literature. The study of the texts in which Brentano explicitly deals with Plato, in particular in his lectures on the history of Greek philosophy, does not change much of the negative impression that emerges from a general overview: the place of Plato in the history of philosophy depends, for Brentano, on Aristotle or, better, on the accomplishment of Greek philosophy occurs in Aristotle’s work. We shall turn our attention towards the of certain relevant problems in order to open up, if possible, a less negative prospect for the relationship of Brentano to Plato: not so much directly by examining Platonic philosophy from a Brentanian point of view as by considering the concrete solution that Brentano provides to some Aristotelian questions. To put it differently, we shall take into account not so much what Brentano says of Plato, as...
Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2020
Phaenomenologica, 2014
When first reading the Vorlesungen uber Ethik und Wertlehre a fact jumps immediately to the eye: ... more When first reading the Vorlesungen uber Ethik und Wertlehre a fact jumps immediately to the eye: the ethical reflection is systematically pushed beyond the limits of a merely reflection on ethics. Besides the attempt to draft a doctrine of values, other questions form the core of this investigation: the idea of philosophy, the possibility of a teleology from a phenomenological perspective, the sense of rational acting throughout a variety of modalities – logical, practical, axiological. The foundation of formal ethics must therefore be understood as part of a broader critique of reason, which Husserl himself expounds during the very same years of these Vorlesungen. The result is a thorough review of the method and the intimate ambition of phenomenology to become structured as a science and ultimately as a system.
L’analogie est la réponse résolutive autant qu’aporétique au problème de l’unité et de la différe... more L’analogie est la réponse résolutive autant qu’aporétique au problème de l’unité et de la différence, scellée dans la multiplicité déroutante des significations de l’être. De cette réponse, il en va du statut de « science » pour la métaphysique. Notre enquête vise à retracer les conditions historiques d’émergence d’un concept (ou d’un complexe conceptuel) qui a marqué de son sceau l’histoire de la pensée, d’Aristote, voire même de Platon jusqu'aux nos jours. Sans cette même pensée de l’analogie – voici notre hypothèse – ni la constitution ni la « destruction » de la métaphysique ne seraient plus pensables. Mais qu’est-ce au juste que l’analogie ? Et jusqu’où s’étend sa portée métaphysique ? La certitude du terme a quo laisse en suspens l’extension de cette parabole, qui exige par reflet la fixation idéale d’un terme ad quem. On fera de la phénoménologie husserlienne un observatoire privilégié pour témoigner des derniers éclats de l’analogie, avant que la « destruction » de la mé...
Phainomenon. Journal of Phenomenological Philosophy, 2017
Cover up that phenomenon, which I can't endure to look on. About the right to see everything (or ... more Cover up that phenomenon, which I can't endure to look on. About the right to see everything (or not) in phenomenology: Husserl between Brentano and Natorp By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not been necessary to wait for phenomenology in oder to have a proper account of phenomena. One need only to take a look at the history of philosophy, from Plato to Kant, as well as at the history of sciences, from physics to psychology, so as to register a wide range of uses concerning the concept of phenomenon. The understanding of what a phenomenon is, in a phenomenological sense, should therefore at least not be completely compatible with any other, if phenomenology has to exist as a discipline and as a method. That is one of the issues at stake in the debate between phenomenology and neokantianism, between Husserl, to a certain extent Brentano, and Natorp. It is on this debate that we shall draw attention, if we wish to grasp the reasons behind the phenomenological conception of the phenomenon, especially at the time of the Logische Untersuchungen.
Keywords: Phenomenon, Transcendence, Intentionality, Psychology, Subject-Object Relationship
![Research paper thumbnail of Presentation – Phenomenon: Cartography of a Fundamental Concept (Phainomenon. Journal of Phenomenological Philosophy, vol. 26 [2017])](https://attachments.academia-assets.com/55428558/thumbnails/1.jpg)
](While it is true that philosophy did not wait for phenomenology to propose a strong theoretical u... more While it is true that philosophy did not wait for phenomenology to propose a strong theoretical usage of the concept of «phenomenon» — Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Hegelian thought clearly support this claim —, phenomenology seems to be expressly designed, as its name suggests it, to have phenomena as its privileged, or even unique, theme of inquiry. Some questions consequently arise: what kind of «phenomena» are we talking about? And what sort of «phenomenology» is involved?
Impressão: Papelmunde, SMG, Lda. -V. N. Famalicão 1.ª edição: Outubro de 2017 Depósito legal: xxx... more Impressão: Papelmunde, SMG, Lda. -V. N. Famalicão 1.ª edição: Outubro de 2017 Depósito legal: xxxxxx/17 ISBN 978 -989 -755-xxx-x ÍNDICE 9 Apresentação A INTENCIONALIDADE NA FENOMENOLOGIA 17 Breve história da intencionalidade. Continuidade e rupturas a partir de Husserl Emanuele Mariani 31 Verdade na Sexta Investigação Lógica: realismo mínimo e conteúdo vivencial Paulo Mendes Taddei 53 A intencionalidade do corpo como expressão em A Fenomenologia da Percepção de Merleau-Ponty Luís Aguiar de Sousa CUIDADO E SENTIMENTO NA FILOSOFIA FENOMENOLÓGICA 75 O fenómeno do cuidado, segundo Kierkegaard Luis Mendes 103 O alcance ontológico do sentimento em Gabriel Marcel: entre fenomenologia e hiperfenomenologia. I. Sensação e existência José Manuel Beato 119 Heidegger: algunas lecciones aristotélicas sobre la facticidad José Manuel Chillón 135 Obra de arte, cuidado e decisão na filosofia de Martin Heidegger Ione Manzali de Sá INTENCIONALIDADE E CUIDADO NA FENOMENOLOGIA DE MICHEL HENRY 149 Uma pedagogia ao serviço da afectividade, na fenomenologia material de Michel Henry Cassiano Maria Reimão 165 A Essência da Manifestação como uma praxis paradoxal: cuidado do Mundo, cuidado da Vida Ana Paula Rosendo 177 Cuidar, administrar e louvar -racionalidade e ipseidade em Michel Henry Ângela Lacerda Nobre REPERCUSSÃO E DERIVAS DAS NOÇÕES DE CUIDADO E INTENCIONALIDADE 191 O Pecado de Epimeteu e a Filosofia como Farmacologia Maria Adelaide Pacheco 207 Reconhecimento, capacitação e justiça social -Ricoeur e Martha Nussbaum Fernanda Henriques 221 Entre Heidegger e Perniola ou sobre o cuidado, o amor e a coisificação do mundo Paulo Alexandre e Castro 239 A intencionalidade histórica e a intencionalidade pós-histórica: do gesto de escrever ao gesto de fotografar Maria Helena Lebre NEUROÉTICA FENOMENOLÓGICO-HERMENÊUTICA DO CUIDADO E DO RECONHECIMENTO 257 El reconocimiento desde la "fenomenología hermenéutica" en perspectiva neurocientífica Javier Gracia Calandín 269 El concepto de `extrema vulnerabilidad´ en la teoría moral de Jürgen Habermas César Ortega Esquembre 277 Neurofenomenologia: uma fenomenologia para o século XXI
Per una psicologia della storia : Brentano, lettore di Comte, e la teoria delle quattro fasi della filosofia, 2019
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 2019
Riassunto: La fenomenologia, in virtu del suo stesso nome, pare rivendicare un diritto di prelazi... more Riassunto: La fenomenologia, in virtu del suo stesso nome, pare rivendicare un diritto di prelazione sui fenomeni. E sufficiente, tuttavia, uno sguardo panoramico sulla storia della filosofia o, piu generalmente, delle scienze per rilevare il vasto impiego che si va affermando, senza fenomenologia, del concetto di fenomeno. In cosa consisterebbe allora la specificita della comprensione fenomenologica dei “fenomeni”? Per rispondere a questa domanda, riconsidereremo il dibattito tra Edmund Husserl autore delle Logische Untersuchungen e Paul Natorp, filosofo neokantiano di Marburgo, le cui tesi presentano un duplice interesse: l’avere, per un verso, sollecitato lo stesso Husserl a una precisazione della proposta fenomenologica; l’aver, per l’altro, anticipato alcuni tra gli argomenti di maggior rilievo nell’ambito delle scienze cognitive in merito ai vari tentativi di naturalizzazione della coscienza. Parole chiave: Fenomeno; Intenzionalita; Oggetto; Edmund Husserl; Paul Natorp Phenome...
Phainomenon, 2011
In the most recent debate of phenomenological as well as analytical provenance, Husserl’s reflect... more In the most recent debate of phenomenological as well as analytical provenance, Husserl’s reflection, although pioneer regarding ethics, seems to suffer of a general depreciation enrooted in his supposed excess rationalism. The husserlian ethics would remain subjected to the dominance of a logico-objectifying reason, which appears to be the fundamental dimension of intentionality. The wide range of life-experiences would then be crushed by the hegemony of objectifying acts. Are we really sure? Our contribution will rather consist in raising the originality of Husserl’s method which lastly to reconcile two seemingly contradictory requirements: the autonomy of ethical and its dependence towards logical reason. We shall notice thus a progressive dissociatoon from Brentano’s teaching leading to an overall revision of intentionality. If anything such as rationalism exists in Husserl’s thinking, it can only be asserted on the condition of a radical criticism of the concept of “representat...
Phainomenon, 2021
Via viatores quaerit Entirely dedicated to Heideggerian thought, the present issue of Phainomenon... more Via viatores quaerit Entirely dedicated to Heideggerian thought, the present issue of Phainomenon brings to maturity the fruits of what, at the beginning, was a meeting between scholars, recognized or in the early stages of their careers, linked by institutional affiliation or elective affinity to the Portuguese language and culture. That meeting took place in Évora in 2019, on the basis of a partnership between the University of Évora and the University of Lisbon, under the title of "II Jornadas Heideggerianas", and it intended to carry on the investigations started in the first "Jornadas Heideggerianas de Évora," an event organised in 2013 with the aim of establishing a dialogue between those who, in Portugal, dedicate themselves totally or partially to the study of Martin Heidegger's thought and to the translation of Heidegger's work into Portuguese. More than the title, however, it is the subtitle of the 2019 meeting that allows us to understand the leitmotiv that unites all the contributions presented here: "Heidegger in conversation with Heidegger". Heidegger's self-interpretation of his own trajectory offers, in fact, an essential working criterion for the historical-conceptual analysis of the constituent moments of Heidegger's philosophical vision. The great complexity of such vision raises, at a hermeneutical level and in a very specific sense, the problem of the unity of the workthe Heideggerian work, conceived as a
Phainomenon, 2017
By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not... more By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not been necessary to wait for phenomenology in oder to have a proper account of phenomena. One need only to take a look at the history of philosophy, from Plato to Kant, as well as at the history of sciences, from physics to psychology, so as to register a wide range of uses concerning the concept of phenomenon. The understanding of what a phenomenon is, in a phenomenological sense, should therefore at least not be completely compatible with any other, if phenomenology has to exist as a discipline and as a method. That is one of the issues at stake in the debate between phenomenology and neokantianism, between Husserl, to a certain extent Brentano, and Natorp. It is on this debate that we shall draw attention, if we wish to grasp the reasons behind the phenomenological conception of the phenomenon, especially at the time of the Logische Untersuchungen.
Phainomenon, 2012
Within the Seinsfrage, the question of being, the «who» question, or Werfrage, arises at once. Wh... more Within the Seinsfrage, the question of being, the «who» question, or Werfrage, arises at once. Who is this «who»? In other words, who am I? Questioning the being, inevitably means questioning ourselves. Would it thus be possible to conceive of a subject without being? This question, paradoxical as it may appear, nevertheless has a historiographical legitimacy, if we consider that «phenomenological anthropology», as the young Heidegger conceived it, precedes in effect the formulation of the Seinsfrage. From his very first lectures in Fribourg, an access into subjectivity, apprehended as a «wordly ipseity », is thereby opened. While criticizing Natorp who unreservedly denied such a possibility, Heidegger yet ends up conceding the point almost entirely. This, at least, is our hypothesis: the «I» exists only at the cost of a tension between facticity and existence, a tension which, in the eyes of Natorp, leads to a confirmation that the «I», strictly speaking, cannot be – and this allow...
Les Études philosophiques, 2018
Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment ... more Tous droits réservés pour tous pays. La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.
Studia Phaenomenologica, 2020
Just hearing the names of Brentano and Plato put together is enough to highlight the queerness of... more Just hearing the names of Brentano and Plato put together is enough to highlight the queerness of a matching which finds almost no evidence in critical literature. The study of the texts in which Brentano explicitly deals with Plato, in particular in his lectures on the history of Greek philosophy, does not change much of the negative impression that emerges from a general overview: the place of Plato in the history of philosophy depends, for Brentano, on Aristotle or, better, on the accomplishment of Greek philosophy occurs in Aristotle’s work. We shall turn our attention towards the of certain relevant problems in order to open up, if possible, a less negative prospect for the relationship of Brentano to Plato: not so much directly by examining Platonic philosophy from a Brentanian point of view as by considering the concrete solution that Brentano provides to some Aristotelian questions. To put it differently, we shall take into account not so much what Brentano says of Plato, as...
Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 2020
Phaenomenologica, 2014
When first reading the Vorlesungen uber Ethik und Wertlehre a fact jumps immediately to the eye: ... more When first reading the Vorlesungen uber Ethik und Wertlehre a fact jumps immediately to the eye: the ethical reflection is systematically pushed beyond the limits of a merely reflection on ethics. Besides the attempt to draft a doctrine of values, other questions form the core of this investigation: the idea of philosophy, the possibility of a teleology from a phenomenological perspective, the sense of rational acting throughout a variety of modalities – logical, practical, axiological. The foundation of formal ethics must therefore be understood as part of a broader critique of reason, which Husserl himself expounds during the very same years of these Vorlesungen. The result is a thorough review of the method and the intimate ambition of phenomenology to become structured as a science and ultimately as a system.
L’analogie est la réponse résolutive autant qu’aporétique au problème de l’unité et de la différe... more L’analogie est la réponse résolutive autant qu’aporétique au problème de l’unité et de la différence, scellée dans la multiplicité déroutante des significations de l’être. De cette réponse, il en va du statut de « science » pour la métaphysique. Notre enquête vise à retracer les conditions historiques d’émergence d’un concept (ou d’un complexe conceptuel) qui a marqué de son sceau l’histoire de la pensée, d’Aristote, voire même de Platon jusqu'aux nos jours. Sans cette même pensée de l’analogie – voici notre hypothèse – ni la constitution ni la « destruction » de la métaphysique ne seraient plus pensables. Mais qu’est-ce au juste que l’analogie ? Et jusqu’où s’étend sa portée métaphysique ? La certitude du terme a quo laisse en suspens l’extension de cette parabole, qui exige par reflet la fixation idéale d’un terme ad quem. On fera de la phénoménologie husserlienne un observatoire privilégié pour témoigner des derniers éclats de l’analogie, avant que la « destruction » de la mé...
Phainomenon. Journal of Phenomenological Philosophy, 2017
Cover up that phenomenon, which I can't endure to look on. About the right to see everything (or ... more Cover up that phenomenon, which I can't endure to look on. About the right to see everything (or not) in phenomenology: Husserl between Brentano and Natorp By its very name, phenomenology seems to invoke a priority claim on phenomena. And yet it has not been necessary to wait for phenomenology in oder to have a proper account of phenomena. One need only to take a look at the history of philosophy, from Plato to Kant, as well as at the history of sciences, from physics to psychology, so as to register a wide range of uses concerning the concept of phenomenon. The understanding of what a phenomenon is, in a phenomenological sense, should therefore at least not be completely compatible with any other, if phenomenology has to exist as a discipline and as a method. That is one of the issues at stake in the debate between phenomenology and neokantianism, between Husserl, to a certain extent Brentano, and Natorp. It is on this debate that we shall draw attention, if we wish to grasp the reasons behind the phenomenological conception of the phenomenon, especially at the time of the Logische Untersuchungen.
Keywords: Phenomenon, Transcendence, Intentionality, Psychology, Subject-Object Relationship
While it is true that philosophy did not wait for phenomenology to propose a strong theoretical u... more While it is true that philosophy did not wait for phenomenology to propose a strong theoretical usage of the concept of «phenomenon» — Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Hegelian thought clearly support this claim —, phenomenology seems to be expressly designed, as its name suggests it, to have phenomena as its privileged, or even unique, theme of inquiry. Some questions consequently arise: what kind of «phenomena» are we talking about? And what sort of «phenomenology» is involved?
Impressão: Papelmunde, SMG, Lda. -V. N. Famalicão 1.ª edição: Outubro de 2017 Depósito legal: xxx... more Impressão: Papelmunde, SMG, Lda. -V. N. Famalicão 1.ª edição: Outubro de 2017 Depósito legal: xxxxxx/17 ISBN 978 -989 -755-xxx-x ÍNDICE 9 Apresentação A INTENCIONALIDADE NA FENOMENOLOGIA 17 Breve história da intencionalidade. Continuidade e rupturas a partir de Husserl Emanuele Mariani 31 Verdade na Sexta Investigação Lógica: realismo mínimo e conteúdo vivencial Paulo Mendes Taddei 53 A intencionalidade do corpo como expressão em A Fenomenologia da Percepção de Merleau-Ponty Luís Aguiar de Sousa CUIDADO E SENTIMENTO NA FILOSOFIA FENOMENOLÓGICA 75 O fenómeno do cuidado, segundo Kierkegaard Luis Mendes 103 O alcance ontológico do sentimento em Gabriel Marcel: entre fenomenologia e hiperfenomenologia. I. Sensação e existência José Manuel Beato 119 Heidegger: algunas lecciones aristotélicas sobre la facticidad José Manuel Chillón 135 Obra de arte, cuidado e decisão na filosofia de Martin Heidegger Ione Manzali de Sá INTENCIONALIDADE E CUIDADO NA FENOMENOLOGIA DE MICHEL HENRY 149 Uma pedagogia ao serviço da afectividade, na fenomenologia material de Michel Henry Cassiano Maria Reimão 165 A Essência da Manifestação como uma praxis paradoxal: cuidado do Mundo, cuidado da Vida Ana Paula Rosendo 177 Cuidar, administrar e louvar -racionalidade e ipseidade em Michel Henry Ângela Lacerda Nobre REPERCUSSÃO E DERIVAS DAS NOÇÕES DE CUIDADO E INTENCIONALIDADE 191 O Pecado de Epimeteu e a Filosofia como Farmacologia Maria Adelaide Pacheco 207 Reconhecimento, capacitação e justiça social -Ricoeur e Martha Nussbaum Fernanda Henriques 221 Entre Heidegger e Perniola ou sobre o cuidado, o amor e a coisificação do mundo Paulo Alexandre e Castro 239 A intencionalidade histórica e a intencionalidade pós-histórica: do gesto de escrever ao gesto de fotografar Maria Helena Lebre NEUROÉTICA FENOMENOLÓGICO-HERMENÊUTICA DO CUIDADO E DO RECONHECIMENTO 257 El reconocimiento desde la "fenomenología hermenéutica" en perspectiva neurocientífica Javier Gracia Calandín 269 El concepto de `extrema vulnerabilidad´ en la teoría moral de Jürgen Habermas César Ortega Esquembre 277 Neurofenomenologia: uma fenomenologia para o século XXI
Né la «costituzione», né tanto-meno la «distruzione» della metafisica sarebbero concepibili se... more Né la «costituzione», né tanto-meno la «distruzione» della
metafisica sarebbero concepibili senza l’analogia. Ecco l’assunto di base da cui procede la nostra indagine, nel tentativo di ridisegnare i limiti di un intreccio che si estende su tutto l’arco della storia del pensiero occidentale: l’analogia rende possibile la realizzazione del progetto della metafisica, abbozzato da Aristotele e inizialmente confinato nell’anonimato di una scienza senza nome – «c’è una scienza che considera l’essere in quanto essere...». E, per riflesso, la realizzazione di tale progetto trasforma l’analogia in analogia entis, vale a dire in un’analogia dell’essere o, meglio, dell’ente, predisposta a regolarne i molteplici significati.
Qual è, allora, la portata di questa alleanza che l’analogia va stringendo con la metafisica? Di quale filosofema si fa portavoce? E soprattutto fin dove si spinge la sua gittata? La nostra ipotesi di ricerca consiste nell’orientare lo sguardo verso Husserl, considerando con particolare interesse il suo rapporto di filiazione nei confronti di Brentano. È nella fenomenologia husserliana, infatti, che assisteremo all’atto finale dell’analogia – atto che risulterà tanto più paradossale alla luce della rottura esplicitamente dichiarata da parte della fenomenologia vis-à-vis della storia della metafisica. Da Aristotele a Husserl e, viceversa, da Husserl a Aristotele: nonostante i cambiamenti di prospettiva, di linguaggio e di pensiero, l’analogia – ecco la tesi che vogliamo dimostrare – non abbandonerà mai il suo originario statuto di analogia dell’essere.

Ni la « constitution », ni la « destruction » de la métaphysique ne seraient concevables sans l’a... more Ni la « constitution », ni la « destruction » de la métaphysique ne seraient concevables sans l’analogie. Voici le coup d’envoi de mon travail de thèse, visant à établir les limites d’un entrelacs qui recouvre toute l’histoire de la pensée occidentale : l’analogie rend possible la réalisation du projet de la métaphysique, esquissé par Aristote et initialement confié à l’anonymat d’une science sans nom. Et inversement, la réalisation de ce projet transforme l’analogie en « analogia entis », c’est-à-dire en analogie de l’être ou, mieux, de l’étant, supposée en régir les multiples significations. Quelle est alors la portée de cette alliance que l’analogie lie avec la métaphysique ? De quel philosophème se fait-elle la porte-parole ? Et surtout jusqu’où s’étend historiquement sa parabole ? Mon hypothèse de recherche a consisté à orienter le regard vers Husserl, en portant un soin particulier à son rapport de filiation vis-à-vis de Brentano. Car c’est dans la phénoménologie husserlienne que l’on assiste à l’acte final de cette analogie – acte qui serait, alors, d’autant plus paradoxal si l’on considère la rupture explicitement déclarée par la phénoménologie elle-même avec toute forme de métaphysique.
Mots clés : analogie, métaphysique, ontologie, doctrine des catégories, phénoménologie, psychologie