RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: | Pádraig Brady |
---|---|
Subject: | RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq |
Date: | Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:44:12 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
-d, -D and -u make sense when used in isolation:
$ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 -D 2 a 2 b 2 c $ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 -u 1 a 3 a pb-laptop:~$ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 -d 2 a
However when you combine -u (suppress last output entry in a repeated group) with -d or -D it doesn't seem useful:
$ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 -d -u $ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 -D -u 2 a 2 b
Why I'm asking is to perhaps overload -u -D to support grouping like:
$ printf "1 a\n2 a\n2 b\n2 c\n3 a\n" | uniq -w1 --unique=separated --all-repeated=separated 1 a
2 a 2 b 2 c
3 a
Or maybe we should just add a new --group option to do the above?
On a related note, if I want to subsequently split that, I can: csplit '/^$/' '{*}' but that leaves the blank lines in the files. I've often wished there was an option to suppress the matched line.
cheers. Pádraig.
- RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq,Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq, Eric Blake, 2011/03/02
- Next by Date:Re: RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq
- Next by thread:Re: RFC: improved support for grouping in uniq
- Index(es):